Transport Pattern and Placement Characteristics of Proppant in Different Rough Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Tianyu [1 ]
Zhong, Pengjun [1 ]
Li, Gensheng [1 ]
Sheng, Mao [1 ]
Wen, Haitao [1 ]
Tian, Shouceng [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Natl Key Lab Petr Resources & Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fracturing design; Proppant transport; Rough fracture; Smooth fracture; Two-phase flow model;
D O I
10.1007/s11242-023-01965-x
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The transport and placement characteristics of proppant in rough fracture is of great significance for optimizing fracturing parameters and making proppant transport to the deep part of fracture for effective support. This paper scans the surface morphology of rock samples after fracturing, generates rough fracture based on the scanned data, and uses high-order interpolation function to generate fracture with different roughness, and establishes a numerical model of proppant transport in different roughness based on Euler-Euler two-phase flow model. The effects of different fracture roughness, fluid velocity, proppant size, proppant density and carrying fluid viscosity on the transport pattern and placement characteristics of proppant were compared and analyzed. The results show that: (1) The complex spatial structure of rough fracture hinders the transport of proppant and makes the placement of proppant in fracture uneven, with the characteristics of tortuous and variable; Compared with smooth fracture, the equilibrium height of proppant in rough fracture is higher, and more settlement at the front end of fracture is easy to cause sand plugging; (2) Higher fluid velocity, smaller density and size are conducive to the transport of proppant in rough fracture, which is not easy to cause sand plugging, and can make proppant be carried to the deep part of fracture for effective support (3) Increasing the viscosity of carrying fluid and reducing the size of proppant can significantly improve the sand carrying performance of fluid, and smaller proppant size can better pass through branch fracture. Compared with changing other process parameters, changing the viscosity of carrying fluid and proppant size has more significant effect. But in the field fracturing process, increasing the viscosity of carrying fluid is easier to achieve, so in the hydraulic fracturing process design, the viscosity of carrying fluid should be considered first, and 70% of dimensionless equilibrium height in rough fracture should be used as the critical point to evaluate sand carrying efficiency. Exceeding 70% is easy to cause sand plugging. Optimize fracturing parameters. It is recommended that fluid velocity should be greater than 0.2 m/s, proppant size should be less than 0.32 mm, proppant density should be less than 2600 kg/m(3), and carrying fluid viscosity should be greater than 2 mPa s in field fracturing construction. (4) Proppant is placed in main fracture first in multi-cluster rough branch fracture, and then carried into branch fracture after reaching a certain height. It shows symmetrical distribution in branch fracture. It is suggested that smaller proppant size should be selected first in field fracturing construction process to enter branch fracture for effective support. The research results provide theoretical basis for realizing efficient filling of proppant in the deep part of fracture and optimizing fracturing parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 269
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transport Pattern and Placement Characteristics of Proppant in Different Rough Fractures
    Tianyu Wang
    Pengjun Zhong
    Gensheng Li
    Mao Sheng
    Haitao Wen
    Shouceng Tian
    Transport in Porous Media, 2023, 149 (1) : 251 - 269
  • [2] Characteristics of proppant transport and placement within rough hydraulic fractures
    Hai, Huang
    Yong, Zheng
    Yi, Wang
    Haizhu, Wang
    Jun, Ni
    Bin, Wang
    Bing, Yang
    Wentong, Zhang
    PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 51 (02) : 453 - 463
  • [3] Characteristics of proppant transport and placement within rough hydraulic fractures附视频
    HUANG Hai
    ZHENG Yong
    WANG Yi
    WANG Haizhu
    NI Jun
    WANG Bin
    YANG Bing
    ZHANG Wentong
    Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, (02) : 453 - 463
  • [4] Experiment on proppant migration and placement behavior in rough fractures
    粗糙裂缝内支撑剂运移铺置行为试验
    Li, Huazhou (huazhou@ualberta.ca), 1600, University of Petroleum, China (45): : 95 - 101
  • [5] Modeling of Proppant Transport and Placement in Hydraulic Fractures
    Sun, Zhuang
    Fang, Xiujun
    Xia, Lin
    Du, Zhenzhong
    Bose, Kingshuk
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Wu, Jingtian
    Fager, Andrew
    Crouse, Bernd
    Albert, Richard
    57th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 2023,
  • [6] Quantitative and visual analysis of proppant transport in rough fractures
    Raimbay, Aigerim
    Babadagli, Tayfun
    Kuru, Ergun
    Develi, Kayhan
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 33 : 1291 - 1307
  • [7] Numerical simulation on proppant migration and placement within the rough and complex fractures
    Tian-Kui Guo
    Zhi-Lin Luo
    Jin Zhou
    Yuan-Zhi Gong
    Cai-Li Dai
    Jin Tang
    Yang Yu
    Bing Xiao
    Bao-Lun Niu
    Ji-Jiang Ge
    Petroleum Science, 2022, 19 (05) : 2268 - 2283
  • [8] Numerical simulation on proppant migration and placement within the rough and complex fractures
    Guo, Tian-Kui
    Luo, Zhi-Lin
    Zhou, Jin
    Gong, Yuan-Zhi
    Dai, Cai-Li
    Tang, Jin
    Yu, Yang
    Xiao, Bing
    Niu, Bao-Lun
    Ge, Ji-Jiang
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2022, 19 (05) : 2268 - 2283
  • [9] Experimental Study of Proppant Placement Characteristics in Curving Fractures
    Wu, Zhiying
    Wu, Chunfang
    Zhou, Linbo
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (19)
  • [10] Proppant transport in rough fractures of unconventional oil and gas reservoirs
    YIN Bangtang
    ZHANG Chao
    WANG Zhiyuan
    SUN Baojiang
    GAO Yonghai
    WANG Xiaopeng
    BI Chuang
    ZHANG Qilong
    WANG Jintang
    SHI Juntai
    Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, (03) : 712 - 721