Towards the co-benefits of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration: A life cycle assessment study for steel slag disposal

被引:12
|
作者
Li, Zijie [1 ]
Xing, Yi [1 ]
Ma, Mengying [1 ]
Su, Wei [1 ,3 ]
Cui, Yongkang [1 ]
Tian, Jinglei [2 ]
Fei, Fan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Energy & Environm Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] HBIS Grp Co Ltd, Grp Strateg Res Inst, Shijiazhuang 050023, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon capture utilization and storage; Co; -benefits; Life cycle assessment; Steel slag; Carbon footprint; MINERAL CARBONATION; IRON; DIOXIDE; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141166
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Achieving decarbonization in the steel industry is of paramount importance for global carbon neutrality. Given the unavoidable generation of calcium -containing steel slag and carbon -rich flue gas emissions in the steelmaking process, steel slag carbonation is considered a CCUS technology capable of achieving pollution and carbon reduction in the steel industry. This study conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the environmental impacts generated within the system boundaries of mainstream hot braising steel slag treatment and a novel carbonation steel slag approach. Results of the research demonstrate that the carbonation route based on carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technology reduces the global warming potential (GWP) by 480% compared to the mainstream hot braising route, yielding -76.78 kg CO2 eq./t steel slag. The carbonation route also mitigates the environmental impact of pollutant emissions; however, it introduces a burden shifting associated with energy and resource consumption. Furthermore, to tackle the challenges of industrial application of steel slag carbonation, this study has explored upgrading schemes and proposed a future carbonation steel slag route that achieves process upgrades. By enabling carbonation of flue gas and improving carbonation efficiency, this route is forecasted to elevate the potential of carbon footprint reduction from 5% to 15% throughout the entire life cycle of steelmaking process. The study confirms that steel slag carbonation is a viable carbon -negative technology, delivering a substantiated CCUS solution for achieving co -benefits of pollution and carbon reduction in the steel industry.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life cycle assessment of a carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain in Italy and Germany: Comparison between carbon dioxide storage and utilization systems
    Leonzio, Grazia
    Bogle, I. David L.
    Foscolo, Pier Ugo
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 55
  • [22] Life cycle assessment of CO2 sequestration in magnesium silicate rock - A comparative study
    Nduagu, Experience
    Bergerson, Joule
    Zevenhoven, Ron
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 55 : 116 - 126
  • [23] Carbon Dioxide Capture in the Iron and Steel Industry: Thermodynamic Analysis, Process Simulation, and Life Cycle Assessment
    Mio, A.
    Petrescu, L.
    Luca, A. -v.
    Galusnyak, S. C.
    Fermeglia, M.
    Cormos, C. -c.
    CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING QUARTERLY, 2022, 36 (04) : 255 - 271
  • [24] Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage/utilization: From current state to future research directions and opportunities
    da Cruz, Tatiane Tobias
    Perrella Balestieri, Jose A.
    de Toledo Silva, Joao M.
    Vilanova, Mateus R. N.
    Oliveira, Otavio J.
    Avila, Ivonete
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2021, 108
  • [25] Environmental impacts of carbon capture and utilization by mineral carbonation: A systematic literature review and meta life cycle assessment
    Thonemann, Nils
    Zacharopoulos, Leon
    Fromme, Felix
    Nuhlen, Jochen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 332
  • [26] Life-cycle assessment to unravel co-benefits and trade-offs of large-scale biochar deployment in Norwegian agriculture
    Tisserant, Alexandre
    Morales, Marjorie
    Cavalett, Otavio
    O'Toole, Adam
    Weldon, Simon P.
    Rasse, Daniel P.
    Cherubini, Francesco
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 179
  • [27] Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach
    Shih, Yi-Hsuan
    Tseng, Chao-Heng
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 119 : 57 - 66
  • [28] Towards the carbon neutrality of sludge treatment and disposal in China: A nationwide analysis based on life cycle assessment and scenario discovery
    Zhou, Xue
    Yang, Jixian
    Zhao, Xinyue
    Dong, Qiyu
    Wang, Xiuheng
    Wei, Liangliang
    Yang, Shan-Shan
    Sun, Huihang
    Ren, Nan-Qi
    Bai, Shunwen
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 174
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilisation as a negative emission technology: Recommendations and case study
    Duval-Dachary, S.
    Lorne, D.
    Beauchet, S.
    Salou, T.
    Helias, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, : 66 - 78
  • [30] Synergies between Geological Sequestration and Microalgae Biofixation for Greenhouse Gas Abatement: Life Cycle Design of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Supply Chains
    Yue, Dajun
    Gong, Jian
    You, Fengqi
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2015, 3 (05): : 841 - 861