Interventions and contextual factors to improve retention in care for patients with hypertension in primary care: Hermeneutic systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Ye, Jiancheng [1 ,2 ]
Sanuade, Olutobi A. [2 ,3 ]
Hirschhorn, Lisa R. [2 ,4 ]
Walunas, Theresa L. [2 ]
Smith, Justin D. [3 ]
Birkett, Michelle A. [2 ]
Baldridge, Abigail S. [2 ,4 ]
Ojji, Dike B. [5 ,6 ]
Huffman, Mark D. [2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Robert J Havey MD Inst Global Hlth, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ Abuja, Teaching Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Unit, Gwagwalada, Nigeria
[6] Univ Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria
[7] Washington Univ St Louis, St Louis, MO USA
[8] George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, Australia
关键词
Hypertension; Retention; Primary care; Implementation science; Hermeneutic systematic review; COMMUNITY-BASED INTERVENTION; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION; PHARMACIST INTERVENTION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; HIV; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107880
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Regular engagement over time in hypertension care, or retention, is a crucial but understudied step in optimizing patient outcomes. This systematic review leverages a hermeneutic methodology to identify, evaluate, and quantify the effects of interventions and contextual factors for improving retention for patients with hypertension. Methods: We searched for articles that were published between 2000 and 2022 from multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO International Trials Registry. We followed the latest version of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline to report the findings for this review. We also synthesized the findings using a hermeneutic methodology for systematic reviews, which used an iterative process to review, integrate, analyze, and interpret evidence. Results: From 4686 screened titles and abstracts, 18 unique studies from 9 countries were identified, including 10 (56%) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 3 (17%) cluster RCTs, and 5 (28%) non-RCT studies. The number of participants ranged from 76 to 1562. The overall mean age range was 41-67 years, and the proportion of female participants ranged from 0% to 100%. Most (n = 17, 94%) studies used non-physician personnel to implement the proposed interventions. Fourteen studies (78%) implemented multilevel combinations of interventions. Education and training, team-based care, consultation, and Short Message Service reminders were the most common interventions tested. Conclusions: This review presents the most comprehensive findings on retention in hypertension care to date and fills the gaps in the literature, including the effectiveness of interventions, their components, and contextual factors. Adaptation of and implementing HIV care models, such differentiated service delivery, may be more effective and merit further study. Registration: CRD42021291368. Protocol registration: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021291368. Available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=291368
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preconception care interventions that reduce risk and improve pregnancy outcomes: a protocol for a systematic review of interventions in primary-care settings
    Withanage, Nishadi
    Moulton, Jessica
    Mazza, Danielle
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2021, 27 (04) : LV - LVI
  • [22] Systematic review of educational interventions in palliative care for primary care physicians
    Alvarez, Marta Pelayo
    Agra, Yolanda
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 20 (07) : 673 - 683
  • [23] Interventions to Improve Screening and Follow-Up in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
    Van Cleave, Jeanne
    Kuhlthau, Karen A.
    Bloom, Sheila
    Newacheck, Paul W.
    Nozzolillo, Alixandra A.
    Homer, Charles J.
    Perrin, James M.
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2012, 12 (04) : 269 - 282
  • [24] EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE THE DETECTION AND TREATMENT OF OSTEOPOROSIS IN PRIMARY CARE SETTINGS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Laliberte, M.
    Perreault, S.
    Shea, B. J.
    Lalonde, L.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 : 107 - 107
  • [25] Interventions to improve medicines optimisation in older people with frailty in primary care: a systematic review
    Faulkner, Lucy
    Hughes, Carmel M.
    Barry, Heather E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 30 (04) : 297 - 304
  • [26] Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings - A systematic review
    Renders, CM
    Valk, GD
    Griffin, SJ
    Wagner, EH
    Van, JTME
    Assendelft, WJJ
    DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (10) : 1821 - 1833
  • [27] Interventions to improve retention-in-care and treatment adherence among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review
    Law, Stephanie
    Daftary, Amrita
    O'Donnell, Max
    Padayatchi, Nesri
    Calzavara, Liviana
    Menzies, Dick
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 53 (01)
  • [28] Can integrated care interventions strengthen primary care and improve outcomes for patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yuqi
    Stokes, Jonathan
    Anselmi, Laura
    Bower, Peter
    Xu, Jin
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2025, 23 (01):
  • [29] Non-pharmacological interventions in primary care to improve the quality of life of older patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review protocol
    Cardoso, Carlos Seica
    Monteiro-Soares, Matilde
    Matos, Joana Rita
    Prazeres, Filipe
    Martins, Carlos
    Gomes, Barbara
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [30] Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review
    Jimenez, Geronimo
    Matchar, David
    Koh, Gerald Choon-Huat
    Car, Josip
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (702): : E10 - E21