Credibilistic Multi-Period Mean-Entropy Rolling Portfolio Optimization Problem Based on Multi-Stage Scenario Tree

被引:0
|
作者
Peykani, Pejman [1 ]
Nouri, Mojtaba [1 ]
Pishvaee, Mir Saman [1 ]
Oprean-Stan, Camelia [2 ]
Mohammadi, Emran [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Ind Engn, Tehran 1684613114, Iran
[2] Lucian Blaga Univ Sibiu, Fac Econ Sci, Sibiu 550324, Romania
关键词
portfolio optimization; fuzzy entropy; rolling optimization; credibility theory; scenario tree; multi-period portfolio model; 90-10; 91-10; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; SELECTION PROBLEM; RISK MEASURE; ALGORITHM; CONSTRAINTS; FRAMEWORK; MODELS;
D O I
10.3390/math11183889
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This study considers a time-consistent multi-period rolling portfolio optimization issue in the context of a fuzzy situation. Rolling optimization with a risk aversion component attempts to separate the time periods and psychological effects of one's investment in a mathematical model. Furthermore, a resilient portfolio selection may be attained by taking into account fuzzy scenarios. Credibilistic entropy of fuzzy returns is used to measure portfolio risk because entropy, as a measure of risk, is not dependent on any certain sort of symmetric membership function of stock returns and may be estimated using nonmetric data. Mathematical modeling is performed to compare the Rolling Model (RM) and the Unified Model (UM). Two empirical studies from the Tehran stock market (10 stocks from April 2017 to April 2019) and the global stock market (20 stocks from April 2021 to April 2023) are utilized to illustrate the applicability of the suggested strategy. The findings reveal that RM can limit the risk of the portfolio at each time, but the portfolio's return is smaller than that of UM. Furthermore, the suggested models outperform the standard deterministic model.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hedging strategies for multi-period portfolio optimization
    Davari-Ardakani, H.
    Aminnayeri, M.
    Seifi, A.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2015, 22 (06) : 2644 - 2663
  • [22] Hedging strategies for multi-period portfolio optimization
    Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
    Sci. Iran., 6 (2644-2663):
  • [23] Multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization with Markov switching parameters
    Departamento de Engenharia de Telecomunicações e Controle, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, CEP: 05508-900, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
    Controle y Automacao, 2008, 19 (02): : 138 - 146
  • [24] Multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization based on Monte-Carlo simulation
    Cong, F.
    Oosterlee, C. W.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2016, 64 : 23 - 38
  • [25] A Multi-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for the Multi-Echelon Multi-Period Reverse Logistics Problem
    Azizi, Vahid
    Hu, Guiping
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [26] Improved Lagrangian-relaxation based approaches for multi-period multi-stage fixed charge transportation problem
    Ezhil, S. A.
    Rajendran, Chandrasekharan
    Srinivas, Sharan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE-OPERATIONS & LOGISTICS, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [27] Solving the multi-stage portfolio optimization problem with a novel particle swarm optimization
    Sun, Jun
    Fang, Wei
    Wu, Xiaojun
    Lai, Choi-Hong
    Xu, Wenbo
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (06) : 6727 - 6735
  • [28] Parallel particle swarm optimization algorithm in multi-stage portfolio optimization problem
    You, ZY
    Sun, J
    Xu, WB
    DCABES AND ICPACE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED ALGORITHMS FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2005, : 115 - 120
  • [29] An effective league championship algorithm for the stochastic multi-period portfolio optimization problem
    Kashan, A. Husseinzadeh
    Eyvazi, M.
    Abbasi-Pooya, A.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2020, 27 (02) : 829 - 845
  • [30] Multi-period mean-variance fuzzy portfolio optimization model with transaction costs
    Liagkouras, K.
    Metaxiotis, K.
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 67 : 260 - 269