Assessment of a Decision-Making Model for Monitoring the Success of a Project for Smart Buildings

被引:5
|
作者
Amhaimedi, Serag [1 ]
Naimi, Sepanta [1 ]
Alsallami, Sura [1 ]
机构
[1] Altinbas Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN | 2023年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Intelligent Building; Multi-Criteria Decision Maker; MCDM; MATLAB Code; CONSTRUCTION; BIM; MANAGEMENT; MCDM;
D O I
10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-01-010
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Objective: To express the usage of intelligent concepts in the architectural building construction field that are primarily concerned with reducing building energy use. Improved energy-saving methods and the use of environmentally friendly design principles are essential in this field. This type of managerial decision-making is necessary for the success of these types of projects. Methods: monitoring the performance of intelligent buildings use the cost variance (CV) and schedule variation as standard metrics to track the progress of a project based on the save energy concept. Also, this research conducted a comparative study on Building Information Modelling (BIM) and (MCDM) decision-making limitations as presented in the article. Analysis: the conventional technique, on the other hand, is unable to offer data on variance from typical performance levels. The main point based on Delphi results of construction cost variables has been observed 19 effective factors. Finding and Novelty: The RII observed that the most effective aspects of an intelligent building are the number of floors in the building, the kind of structural design, and the size of the shadow cast on the surface of the building. The Multi-Criteria Decision Maker (MCDM) observed significant differences in planned value (PV) and actual value (AC) results. In addition, as a result of the current approach, it is possible to track project costs and timelines more precisely.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 142
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DECISION-MAKING AND WORTH ASSESSMENT
    FARRIS, DR
    SAGE, AP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1975, 6 (12) : 1135 - 1178
  • [42] IMPACT OF AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING IN THERAPEUTIC DECISION-MAKING: THE HYGIA PROJECT
    Hermida, R.
    Fernandez, J. R.
    Mojon, A.
    Ayala, D. E.
    Dominguez, M.
    Moya, A.
    Castineira, M. C.
    Crespo, J. J.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2010, 28 : E76 - E76
  • [43] Multiobjective Decision-Making Model for Power Scheduling Problem in Smart Homes
    Chang, Chen-Yu
    Tsai, Pei-Fang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [44] OntoAgency: An agency-based ontology for tracing control, ownership and decision-making in smart buildings
    de Souza, Clarice Bleil
    Badyina, Anna
    Golubchikov, Oleg
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 256
  • [45] SUCCESS IN DECISION-MAKING - DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS, DIFFERING REASONS FOR SUCCESS
    RODRIGUES, SB
    HICKSON, DJ
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1995, 32 (05) : 655 - 678
  • [46] Smart retrofitting for office buildings: Comparison of decision-making criteria between developing and developed regions
    Peiris, Sanduni
    Lai, Joseph H. K.
    Kumaraswamy, Mohan M.
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 97
  • [47] A Shared Decision-making Intervention Success or Failure?
    Barry, Michael J.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 123 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [48] FORMULATION TACTICS AND THE SUCCESS OF ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION-MAKING
    NUTT, PC
    DECISION SCIENCES, 1992, 23 (03) : 519 - 540
  • [49] SUCCESS AND RESPONSE RATE IN COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING
    STREUFERT, S
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 8 (05) : 389 - +
  • [50] Experience-Driven Model of Decision-Making Processes in Project Teams
    Orlowski, Cezary
    Sarzynski, Arkadiusz
    Sitek, Tomasz
    Ziolkowski, Artur
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 46 (1-2) : 131 - 143