Political Uncertainty and Corporate Investment: Evidence from the Chinese Private Companies

被引:1
|
作者
Piao, Long [1 ]
Jung, Kwangho [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Govt, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Adm, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Korea Inst Publ Affairs, Grad Sch Publ Adm, Bldg 57-1,1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
关键词
Political uncertainty; city-level party secretary turnover; corporate investment; privatized state-owned enterprises; INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT; POLICY; PERFORMANCE; INCENTIVES; CORRUPTION; LEADERSHIP; CAMPAIGN; MARKETS; WORLD; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1177/00219096221144693
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
China's political system has continued to maintain a highly centralized regime despite embracing a decentralized development strategy after the 1979 economic reform. The central government frequently makes changes in political leadership to control regional governments. Such political turnover in the regional governments can generate substantial political uncertainty, which affects the overall management direction and environment of Chinese public enterprises. This study analyzes the impact of replacing city-level party secretaries (CPS) on corporate investment in 228 municipal cities in China. Political appointees can replace city-level party secretaries from within and outside the city or from higher levels of the government. Our empirical results show that these kinds of replacements more significantly dampened investment activities in listed private companies than in companies in which the city-level party secretaries have retained their positions. Corporate investment activities decreased more when a city-level party secretary was replaced with a person outside the city or parachuted from central government than when replaced within the city. Moreover, replacement effects were more negative for privatized state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than for the original privately owned companies.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1675
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The influence of fiscal policy uncertainty on corporate total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese public companies
    Zhang, Rongwu
    Luo, Lan
    Du, Jianjun
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2023, 41 (03) : 532 - 554
  • [32] Economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment: Evidence from China
    Wang, Yizhong
    Chen, Carl R.
    Huang, Ying Sophie
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2014, 26 : 227 - 243
  • [33] Economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment: evidence from China
    Xiangyuan Meng
    Haoge Guo
    Jie Li
    Economic Change and Restructuring, 2023, 56 : 4491 - 4529
  • [34] Electoral Uncertainty and Corporate Investment: Evidence from European Countries
    Madr, Michal
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2021, 69 (06): : 647 - 666
  • [35] Does Entrepreneurs' Military Experience Promote Corporate Environmental Investment? Evidence from Chinese Private Firms
    Hong, Conghua
    Yan, Youliang
    Zhang, Xinxin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (04)
  • [36] Corporate political connection building and stock price volatility: evidence from Chinese-listed companies
    Guo, Yuhang
    Huang, Lianghua
    Wang, Fanlin
    Guo, Xinxin
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025, 57 (03) : 353 - 367
  • [37] Public and Private Sanctions for Corporate Misconduct: Evidence From Listed Companies
    Cardone-Riportella, Clara
    Garcia-Olalla, Myriam
    Vazquez-Ordas, Camilo J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2023, 19 (03) : 427 - 443
  • [38] Fixed investment or financial assets investment: Evidence from political uncertainty in China
    Yao, Chengxue
    Jiang, Fan
    Guo, Liang
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2023, 63 (01): : 427 - 450
  • [39] Economic policy uncertainty and Chinese companies' overseas investment
    Wan, Enze
    Li, Zhezhou
    Zhao, Liang
    Zhang, Xiangjian
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96
  • [40] An analysis of political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles in Pakistan
    Akbar Z.
    Bashir M.F.
    Tariq Y.B.
    Quality & Quantity, 2021, 55 (6) : 2271 - 2293