Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy: On the Ethical Dimension of Recommender Systems

被引:9
|
作者
Bonicalzi, Sofia [1 ,2 ]
De Caro, Mario [1 ,3 ]
Giovanola, Benedetta [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Philosophy Commun & Performing Arts, Rome, Italy
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, CVBE Cognit Values Behav, Munich, Germany
[3] Tufts Univ, Dept Philosophy, Medford, CA USA
[4] Univ Macerata, Dept Polit Sci Commun & Int Relat, Macerata, Italy
来源
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Autonomy; Identity; Reasons-responsiveness; Recommender systems; Reflective-endorsement;
D O I
10.1007/s11245-023-09922-5
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Feasting on a plethora of social media platforms, news aggregators, and online marketplaces, recommender systems (RSs) are spreading pervasively throughout our daily online activities. Over the years, a host of ethical issues have been associated with the diffusion of RSs and the tracking and monitoring of users' data. Here, we focus on the impact RSs may have on personal autonomy as the most elusive among the often-cited sources of grievance and public outcry. On the grounds of a philosophically nuanced notion of autonomy, we illustrate three specific reasons why RSs may limit or compromise it: the threat of manipulation and deception associated with RSs; the RSs' power to reshape users' personal identity; the impact of RSs on knowledge and critical thinking. In our view, however, notwithstanding these legitimate concerns, RSs may effectively help users to navigate an otherwise overwhelming landscape. Our perspective, therefore, is not to be intended as a bulwark to protect the status quo but as an invitation to carefully weigh these aspects in the design of ethically oriented RSs.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 832
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ethical Management of Artificial Intelligence
    Brendel, Alfred Benedikt
    Mirbabaie, Milad
    Lembcke, Tim-Benjamin
    Hofeditz, Lennart
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 18
  • [32] Be wary of 'ethical' artificial intelligence
    Michael Stocker
    Nature, 2016, 540 : 525 - 525
  • [33] Ethical Practice and Artificial Intelligence
    Muller, Lynn S.
    PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 29 (05) : 226 - 228
  • [34] Approaching autonomy in medical artificial intelligence
    Bitterman, Danielle S.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    Mak, Raymond H.
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2020, 2 (09): : E447 - E449
  • [35] Human autonomy in the age of artificial intelligence
    Carina Prunkl
    Nature Machine Intelligence, 2022, 4 : 99 - 101
  • [36] Persistent Autonomy Artificial Intelligence or Biomimesis?
    Lane, David M.
    2012 IEEE/OES AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES (AUV), 2012,
  • [37] Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems
    Winfield, Alan F. T.
    Jirotka, Marina
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2018, 376 (2133):
  • [38] Ethical Issues and Related Considerations Involved with Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
    Alotaibi, Saud S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 9 (04) : 35 - 40
  • [39] The IEEE Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
    Chatila, Raja
    Firth-Butterflied, Kay
    Havens, John C.
    Karachalios, Konstantinos
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2017, 24 (01) : 110 - 110
  • [40] Artificial intelligence: a future dimension for industry
    Neipp, Gerhard
    Technische Mitteilungen Krupp English ed., 1988, (02): : 73 - 84