A new type of elastic fixation, using an encircling and binding technique, for tibiofibular syndesmosis stabilization: comparison to traditional cortical screw fixation

BackgroundThe distal tibiofibular syndesmosis (DTS) is a complex fibrous joint that contributes to the stability and weight-bearing function of the ankle. As such, repair of DTS injury is required, providing fixation strength while maintaining ankle range of motion. The aim of this study was to compare a new elastic fixation technique, using an encircling and binding technique, for DTS stabilization, compared to the traditional cortical bone screw fixation.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 67 patients treated for a DTS injury at our hospital, between June 2019 and June 2021. Of them, 33 were treated with encircling and binding (EB group) and 34 using a cortical screw (CS group). The following outcomes were compared between groups: time to inferior tibiofibular fixation; length of hospital stay; time to partial weight bearing; time to complete weight bearing; complications; imaging data; and functional scores.ResultsSuccessful stabilization was achieved in all cases, with a mean follow-up period of 15.78 +/- 2.97 months. Time to fixation and time to partial and complete weight bearing were shorter for the EB than that for the CS group. The length of hospital was not different between groups. With regard to complications, a superficial infection developed in one patient in each group, with wound healing achieved after active treatment. Screw fracture occurred in two patients in the CS group. At 3 months post-surgery, the American Foot Surgery Association Ankle-Hindfoot score (AOFAS) was higher and the pain score lower for the EB than that for the CS group, but with no between-group difference at the final follow-up. On imaging, the tibiofibular clear space and tibiofibular overlap were not different between groups.ConclusionsDTS fixation using encircling and binding yielded better clinical and functional outcomes than did cortical screw fixation at 3 months post-surgery, with no difference at the final follow-up. This novel fixation technique provides firm fixation, combined with earlier return to postoperative exercise and recovery of ankle function.