Deep Learning for Improved Precision and Reproducibility of Left Ventricular Strain in Echocardiography: A Test-Retest Study

被引:0
|
作者
Salte, Ivar M. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Ostvik, Andreas [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Olaisen, Sindre H. [3 ,4 ]
Karlsen, Sigve [2 ,6 ]
Dahlslett, Thomas [6 ]
Smistad, Erik [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Eriksen-Volnes, Torfinn K. [3 ,4 ,10 ]
Brunvand, Harald [6 ]
Haugaa, Kristina H. [2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Edvardsen, Thor [2 ,7 ]
Dalen, Havard [3 ,4 ,10 ,11 ]
Lovstakken, Lasse [3 ,4 ]
Grenne, Bjornar [3 ,4 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Southern Norway, Dept Med, Kristiansand, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Innovat Ultrasound Solut, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
[5] SINTEF Digital, Med Image Anal, Hlth Res, Trondheim, Norway
[6] Hosp Southern Norway, Dept Med, Arendal, Norway
[7] Oslo Univ Hosp, ProCardio Ctr Innovat, Dept Cardiol, Rikshosp, Oslo, Norway
[8] Karolinska Inst, Fac Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[9] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Cardiovasc Div, Stockholm, Sweden
[10] St Olavs Univ Hosp, Clin Cardiol, Postbox 3250, NO-7006 Trondheim, Norway
[11] Levanger Hosp, Nord Trondelag Hosp Trust, Levanger, Norway
关键词
Left ventricular function; Echocardiography; Strain; Reproducibility; Artificial intelligence; SPECKLE-TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; GLOBAL LONGITUDINAL STRAIN; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; CONSENSUS DOCUMENT; EXPERT CONSENSUS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; QUANTIFICATION; GUIDELINES; AGREEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) function by echocardiography is hampered by modest test-retest reproducibility. A novel artificial intelligence (AI) method based on deep learning provides fully automated mea-surements of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and may improve the clinical utility of echocardiography by reducing user-related variability. The aim of this study was to assess within-patient test-retest reproducibility of LV GLS measured by the novel AI method in repeated echocardiograms recorded by different echocardi-ographers and to compare the results to manual measurements.Methods: Two test-retest data sets (n = 40 and n = 32) were obtained at separate centers. Repeated record-ings were acquired in immediate succession by 2 different echocardiographers at each center. For each data set, 4 readers measured GLS in both recordings using a semiautomatic method to construct test-retest inter-reader and intrareader scenarios. Agreement, mean absolute difference, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were compared to analyses by AI. In a subset of 10 patients, beat-to-beat variability in 3 cardiac cycles was assessed by 2 readers and AI.Results: Test-retest variability was lower with AI compared with interreader scenarios (data set I: MDC = 3.7 vs 5.5, mean absolute difference = 1.4 vs 2.1, respectively; data set II: MDC = 3.9 vs 5.2, mean absolute differ-ence = 1.6 vs 1.9, respectively; all P < .05). There was bias in GLS measurements in 13 of 24 test-retest inter-reader scenarios (largest bias, 3.2 strain units). In contrast, there was no bias in measurements by AI. Beat-to-beat MDCs were 1,5, 2.1, and 2.3 for AI and the 2 readers, respectively. Processing time for analyses of GLS by the AI method was 7.9 6 2.8 seconds.Conclusion: A fast AI method for automated measurements of LV GLS reduced test-retest variability and removed bias between readers in both test-retest data sets. By improving the precision and reproducibility, AI may increase the clinical utility of echocardiography. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2023;36:788-99.)
引用
收藏
页码:788 / 799
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Test-retest reproducibility of maximum cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography
    Rowland, TW
    Melanson, EL
    Popowski, BE
    Ferrone, LC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (10): : 1228 - +
  • [2] Improved reproducibility of regional longitudinal strain in echocardiography by deep learning
    Nyberg, J.
    Ostvik, A.
    Salte, I. M.
    Olaisen, S.
    Karlsen, S.
    Dahlslett, T.
    Smistad, E.
    Eriksen-Volnes, T.
    Brunvand, H.
    Edvardsen, T.
    Haugaa, K. H.
    Lovstakken, L.
    Dalen, H.
    Grenne, B.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [3] Test-retest reproducibility of a deep learning–based automatic detection algorithm for the chest radiograph
    Hyungjin Kim
    Chang Min Park
    Jin Mo Goo
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 2346 - 2355
  • [5] Test-retest reproducibility of a deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm for the chest radiograph
    Kim, Hyungjin
    Park, Chang Min
    Goo, Jin Mo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) : 2346 - 2355
  • [6] SHOULD ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY BE PERFORMED TO ASSESS EFFECTS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY - TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR MEASUREMENT OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS AND FUNCTION
    GOTTDIENER, JS
    LIVENGOOD, SV
    MEYER, PS
    CHASE, GA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 25 (02) : 424 - 430
  • [7] Which parameter of left ventricular function is most robust is a test-retest setting?
    Baron, T.
    Berglund, L.
    Flachskampf, F. A.
    Hedin, E. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 158 - 158
  • [8] Reproducibility of strength performance and strength-endurance profiles: A test-retest study
    Mitter, Benedikt
    Csapo, Robert
    Bauer, Pascal
    Tschan, Harald
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [9] Test-retest reliability of new and conventional echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic function
    Baron, Tomasz
    Berglund, Lars
    Hedin, Eva-Maria
    Flachskampf, Frank A.
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 108 (04) : 355 - 365
  • [10] Test-Retest Reliability of Deep Learning Analysis of Brain Volumes in Adolescent Brain
    Kasparbauer, Anna-Maria
    Wunram, Heidrun Lioba
    Abuhsin, Fabian
    Koerber, Friederike
    Schoenau, Eckhard
    Bender, Stephan
    Duran, Ibrahim
    INFORMATION, 2024, 15 (12)