Assessing and improving strong-shock accuracy in the material point method

被引:0
|
作者
Povolny, Stefan J. [1 ]
Homel, Michael A. [1 ]
Herbold, Eric B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Computat Geosci Grp, 7000 East Ave L-185, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
关键词
Material point method; MPM; Shock; FMPM; CPDI; BSPLINE; FRACTURE; CONTACT; WAVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2023.116350
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Material Point Method (MPM) has appealing attributes for simulations involving large deformation of materials with history-dependent constitutive laws. It avoids the mesh tangling errors of Lagrangian finite element methods, as well as the advection errors typical of Eulerian or ALE methods. Recent developments in the MPM have led to a better understanding of the error and dissipation that arise in the particle-to-grid and grid-to-particle mapping, but significant error and high-frequency noise can still occur in simulations involving strong shock waves. This error appears to be associated with the kinematics on the background computational grid common to all MPM implementations. An investigation of forward- and reverse-ballistic impact simulations has revealed that sub grid-scale variations in the material state arise as the shock front enters a grid cell, and that this non-equilibrium state can persist unless the background grid has some means to relax the resultant particle-scale noise. Relaxation can occur when (i) the background grid shape functions have non-constant gradient, (ii) the shocked material has a sufficiently high velocity relative to the background grid, or (iii) the velocity field is enriched with additional degrees of freedom for treating weak discontinuities between particles. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Automatically Improving Accuracy for Floating Point Expressions
    Panchekha, Pavel
    Sachez-Stern, Alex
    Wilcox, James R.
    Tatlock, Zachary
    ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2015, 50 (06) : 1 - 11
  • [32] Advances in melting point measurement: Improving accuracy
    Ball, DM
    AMERICAN LABORATORY, 2002, 34 (04) : 74 - +
  • [33] Modeling shock responses of PBX9501 explosive using material point method
    Shang H.-L.
    Zhao F.
    Li T.
    Ji G.-F.
    Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016, 36 : 98 - 101
  • [34] A METHOD FOR GENERATING STRONG SHOCK WAVES
    HERTZBERG, A
    SMITH, WE
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1954, 25 (01) : 130 - 131
  • [35] GPS accuracy analysis and the study of accuracy improving method
    Fang, H
    He, Y
    ACTUAL TASKS ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 33 : 379 - 390
  • [37] Assessing the numerical accuracy of the impedance method
    Olree, Kenneth S.
    Horch, Kenneth W.
    BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2007, 28 (06) : 454 - 462
  • [38] Multistep weighted least squares estimation method for improving single-point positioning accuracy
    Guan, Qinglin
    Fan, Chunming
    Zheng, Jishi
    Wang, Guangyao
    Chen, Guangyong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 13 (03)
  • [39] A METHOD OF ASSESSING ACCURACY OF A DIGITAL CLASSIFICATION
    QUIRK, BK
    SCARPACE, FL
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1980, 46 (11): : 1427 - 1431
  • [40] Assessing point forecast accuracy by stochastic error distance
    Diebold, Francis X.
    Shin, Minchul
    ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2017, 36 (6-9) : 588 - 598