Assessing and improving strong-shock accuracy in the material point method

被引:0
|
作者
Povolny, Stefan J. [1 ]
Homel, Michael A. [1 ]
Herbold, Eric B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Computat Geosci Grp, 7000 East Ave L-185, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
关键词
Material point method; MPM; Shock; FMPM; CPDI; BSPLINE; FRACTURE; CONTACT; WAVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2023.116350
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Material Point Method (MPM) has appealing attributes for simulations involving large deformation of materials with history-dependent constitutive laws. It avoids the mesh tangling errors of Lagrangian finite element methods, as well as the advection errors typical of Eulerian or ALE methods. Recent developments in the MPM have led to a better understanding of the error and dissipation that arise in the particle-to-grid and grid-to-particle mapping, but significant error and high-frequency noise can still occur in simulations involving strong shock waves. This error appears to be associated with the kinematics on the background computational grid common to all MPM implementations. An investigation of forward- and reverse-ballistic impact simulations has revealed that sub grid-scale variations in the material state arise as the shock front enters a grid cell, and that this non-equilibrium state can persist unless the background grid has some means to relax the resultant particle-scale noise. Relaxation can occur when (i) the background grid shape functions have non-constant gradient, (ii) the shocked material has a sufficiently high velocity relative to the background grid, or (iii) the velocity field is enriched with additional degrees of freedom for treating weak discontinuities between particles. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STRONG-SHOCK TRAJECTORY BY SERIES EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT
    REDDALL, WF
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 23 (08): : 996 - 996
  • [2] Spherical strong-shock generation for shock-ignition inertial fusion
    Theobald, W.
    Nora, R.
    Seka, W.
    Lafon, M.
    Anderson, K. S.
    Hohenberger, M.
    Marshall, F. J.
    Michel, D. T.
    Solodov, A. A.
    Stoeckl, C.
    Edgell, D. H.
    Yaakobi, B.
    Casner, A.
    Reverdin, C.
    Ribeyre, X.
    Shvydky, A.
    Vallet, A.
    Peebles, J.
    Beg, F. N.
    Wei, M. S.
    Betti, R.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2015, 22 (05)
  • [3] Energy-conserving Relativistic Corrections to Strong-shock Propagation
    Coughlin, Eric R.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 880 (02):
  • [4] Prediction of strong-shock structure using the bimodal distribution function
    Solovchuk, Maxim A.
    Sheu, Tony W. H.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2011, 83 (02):
  • [5] HYPERSONIC SMALL-DISTURBANCE THEORY FOR A PLANE OGIVE IN STRONG-SHOCK APPROXIMATION
    CAMBELL, GS
    JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1967, 14 (04): : 178 - &
  • [6] A comparison of the shock response of the Material Point Method
    Ruggirello, K. P.
    Schumacher, S. C.
    18TH APS-SCCM AND 24TH AIRAPT, PTS 1-19, 2014, 500
  • [7] Structural Performance Improvement and Optimal Design for a Strong-Shock Resistant Turntable Cabinet
    Jiang, Bo
    Zhang, Liangjuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH ASIA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MECHATRONICS, VOL II, 2020, 589 : 42 - 55
  • [8] Modeling delamination as a strong discontinuity with the material point method
    Schreyer, HL
    Sulsky, DL
    Zhou, SJ
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2002, 191 (23-24) : 2483 - 2507
  • [9] Application of material point method to shock load problems
    State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
    Gongcheng Lixue, 2006, 5 (46-51):
  • [10] Denoising Method for Improving Detection Accuracy of Point Source Method by MTF
    Chen Lixuan
    Rao Peng
    Zhu Hanlu
    Sun Yingying
    Jia Liangjie
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2020, 57 (18)