Incidence and Risk Factors for Secondary Glaucoma in Eyes with Uveal Melanoma

被引:5
|
作者
Stadigh, Anni E. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Puska, Paivi M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kivela, Tero T. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Ophthalmol, Glaucoma Serv, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Ophthalmol, Ocular Oncol Serv, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Ophthalmol, Haartmaninkatu 4 C PL 220, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Haartmaninkatu 4 C PL 220, Helsinki 00029, Finland
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA | 2023年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
Brachytherapy; Neovascular glaucoma; Secondary glaucoma; Uveal melanoma; ANTERIOR-CHAMBER ANGLE; PLAQUE RADIOTHERAPY; IRIS MELANOMA; CILIARY BODY; IODINE BRACHYTHERAPY; OCULAR COMPLICATIONS; VISUAL OUTCOMES; TUMOR-CONTROL; JUXTAPAPILLARY; RU-106;
D O I
10.1016/j.ogla.2022.08.002
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate incidence of and analyze risk factors for developing secondary glaucoma in eyes with uveal melanoma before and after diagnosis.Design: A cross-sectional, population-based cohort study.Participants: Seven hundred eighty-one patients (median age, 64 years; range, 14-93) consecutively diagnosed with uveal melanoma from 1997 to 2012 in a national ocular oncology service, 708 (91%) of whom received ruthenium (50%) or iodine (50%) brachytherapy.Methods: Patient, tumor, treatment, and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Frequency and associations of melanoma-related glaucoma at tumor diagnosis were assessed. Incidence of developing secondary glaucoma after diagnosis was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Independent risk factors were modeled using Cox regression.Main Outcome Measures: Melanoma-related glaucoma and related risk factors.Results: Forty-five patients (5.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-7.6) had tumor-related secondary glaucoma at diagnosis, 34 (76%) from a narrow-to-closed angle (25 had direct angle invasion) and 10 (22%) from anterior neovascularization. Synchronous metastases were common in patients with initial secondary glaucoma (11% vs. 1.2% with incident glaucoma, P = 0.005). Patients with secondary glaucoma were often male (58% vs. 48% without glaucoma; P = 0.010) and had larger tumors (median thickness, 9.1 vs. 4.0 mm; P < 0.001) involving the ciliary body (43% vs. 21%; P < 0.001) with retinal detachment (53% vs. 30%; P < 0.001). One hundred and sixty-eight patients 165 of which were treated with brachytherapy developed incident tumor-or treatment-related secondary glaucoma a median of 1.7 years (range, 0.1-13.6) after tumor diagnosis. Cumulative proportion of developing secondary glaucoma was 23% (95% CI, 20-27) at 5 years. The most common mechanism was neovascularization in 119 patients (71%; 95% CI, 63-78). By multivariable regression, initial retinal detachment 3 to 4 quadrants (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P < 0.001), initial intraocular pressure 17 mmHg or higher (HR, 1.64; P = 0.01), and tumor thickness predicted incident secondary glaucoma.Conclusions: Secondary glaucoma at initial uveal melanoma diagnosis predicts high risk of synchronous metastases. Although anterior neovascularization is the most common mechanism for secondary glaucoma after diagnosis, other mechanisms such as angle narrowing and anterior chamber hemorrhage are not infrequent. Initial retinal detachment and intraocular pressure with tumor thickness could inform interim assessments of intraocular pressure and neovascularization. Ophthalmology Glaucoma 2023;6:29-41 2022 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 41
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The incidence and risk factors of neovascular glaucoma secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy after vitrectomy
    Sun, Difang
    Lin, Yifan
    Zeng, Rui
    Yang, Zhenlan
    Deng, Xiaowen
    Lan, Yuqing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (06) : 3057 - 3067
  • [32] Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in eyes with uveal melanoma
    Haimovici, R
    Mukai, S
    Schachat, AP
    Haynie, GD
    Thomas, MA
    Meredith, TA
    Gragoudas, ES
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 1996, 16 (06): : 488 - 496
  • [33] Eviscerated eyes unexpectedly containing uveal melanoma
    Van Ginderdeuren, R.
    Mombaerts, I.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2014, 92
  • [34] Inadvertent Evisceration of Eyes Containing Uveal Melanoma
    Eagle, Ralph C., Jr.
    Grossniklaus, Hans E.
    Syed, Nasreen
    Hogan, R. Nick
    Lloyd, William C., III
    Folberg, Robert
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 127 (02) : 141 - 145
  • [35] Incidence, risk factors and prevention of melanoma
    MacKie, RM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 : S3 - S6
  • [36] Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in eyes with uveal melanoma
    Haimovici, R
    Mukai, S
    Haynie, GD
    Thomas, MA
    Meredith, TA
    Gragoudas, ES
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 3106 - 3106
  • [37] Uveal melanoma masquerading as pigment dispersion glaucoma
    Johnson, David L.
    Altaweel, Michael M.
    Neekhra, Aneesh
    Chandra, Suresh R.
    Albert, Daniel M.
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 126 (06) : 868 - 869
  • [38] Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of retroprosthetic membranes following Boston keratoprosthesis eyes and the impact of glaucoma surgery
    Gabriel, Beshoy S.
    Robbins, Cason B.
    Wisely, C. Ellis
    Gabriel, Rami S.
    Daluvoy, Melissa B.
    Fekrat, Sharon
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 262 (08) : 2561 - 2567
  • [39] Differences and Similarities in Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Cutaneous and Uveal Melanoma
    Branisteanu, Daciana Elena
    Porumb-Andrese, Elena
    Starica, Alexandra
    Munteanu, Anca Catalina
    Toader, Mihaela Paula
    Zemba, Mihail
    Porumb, Vlad
    Cozmin, Mihai
    Moraru, Andreea Dana
    Nicolescu, Alin Codrut
    Branisteanu, Daniel Constantin
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (05):
  • [40] INCIDENCE OF UVEAL MALIGNANT-MELANOMA
    SHAMMAS, HF
    WATZKE, RC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1979, 88 (03) : 629 - 629