Impact of choosing wisely on imaging in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Lange, Suzanne M. [1 ]
Choudry, Mouneeb M. [2 ]
Hunt, Trevor C. [3 ]
Ambrose, Jacob P. [4 ,5 ]
Haaland, Benjamin A. [6 ]
Lowrance, William T. [7 ]
Hanson, Heidi A. [4 ,5 ]
O'Neil, Brock B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Div Urol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Div Urol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Div Biostat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Bon Secours, Dept Urol Oncol, Easley, SC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Healthcare utilization; Staging imaging; Choosing Wisely; Prostate cancer; Guidelines; CARE; GUIDELINES; VETERANS; QUALITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Encouraging the appropriate use of staging imaging in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer remains a challenge. Assessing the effects of national efforts may help guide future initiatives in curtailing low-value care. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the Choosing Wisely campaign on imaging utilization among men with prostate cancer. Methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results - Medicare data were used to complete a longitudinal population-based study of men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2007 to 2015. An interrupted time series analysis evaluated the impact of the Choosing Wisely campaign on trends of imaging utilization. Results: From 2007 to 2015 imaging utilization in low-risk patients decreased, with computed tomography (CT) usage declining from 45.0% to 34.4% (P < 0.001) and nuclear medicine bone scan (NMBS) from 27.8% to 11.7% (P < 0.001). Choosing Wisely likely contributed to an absolute reduction of 2.9% (P=0.03) in utilization of NMBS in the low-risk population. Imaging usage for all modalities increased in the high-risk population, but with 32.8% continuing to not receive guideline-supported imaging. Conclusions: In 2012, the Choosing Wisely campaign sought to decrease inappropriate staging imaging for men with low-risk prostate cancer and encourage stewardship of medical resources. Overall decreases in staging imaging trends suggest a move towards higher value care. However, this study found that the Choosing Wisely recommendations had a modest impact on utilization of NMBS, but not CT or PET scans. These results may help inform future efforts to promote guideline concordant imaging. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48.e19 / 48.e26
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Are we choosing wisely? Operationalizing Choosing Wisely in the Ontario cancer system.
    Singh, Simron
    Earle, Craig
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Coburn, Natalie G.
    Rahman, Farah
    Liu, Ning
    Cheung, Matthew C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (08)
  • [42] Prostate radiotherapy in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer
    Ali, Adnan
    Parker, Christopher C.
    Clarke, Noel W.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) : 620 - 628
  • [43] HEALTH ECONOMIC IMPACT OF A 17-GENE PANEL PREDICTING AGGRESSIVE DISEASE IN MEN WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED PROSTATE CANCER
    Sarle, R.
    Kirsh, G.
    Kassabian, V
    Lu, R.
    Mega, M.
    Shindel, A. W.
    Febbo, P.
    Kemeter, M.
    Westerman, C.
    Lowentritt, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A9 - A10
  • [44] ADHERENCE OF KAISER PERMANENTE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TO CHOOSING WISELY® INITIATIVE IN RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Artenstein, Daniel
    Kern, Tyler
    Krug, Aaron
    Chung, Joanie
    Jacobsen, Steven
    Chien, Gary
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E945 - E945
  • [45] Multidisciplinary total eradication therapy (TET) in men with newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer
    Reyes, D. K.
    Rowe, S. P.
    Schaeffer, E. M.
    Allaf, M. E.
    Ross, A. E.
    Pavlovich, C. P.
    Deville, C.
    Tran, P. T.
    Pienta, K. J.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 37 (07)
  • [46] Preliminary Treatment Considerations Among Men With Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Editorial Comment
    Penson, David F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03): : 898 - 899
  • [47] Multidisciplinary total eradication therapy (TET) in men with newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer
    D. K. Reyes
    S. P. Rowe
    E. M. Schaeffer
    M. E. Allaf
    A. E. Ross
    C. P. Pavlovich
    C. Deville
    P. T. Tran
    K. J. Pienta
    Medical Oncology, 2020, 37
  • [48] Follow up of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in the PSMA PET/CT era
    Ong, Sean
    Pascoe, Claire
    Ballock, Zita
    Sengupta, Shomik
    Murphy, Declan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 129 : 154 - 154
  • [49] Primary Intermittent Androgen Deprivation As Initial Therapy for Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer
    Scholz, Mark C.
    Lam, Richard Y.
    Strum, Stephen B.
    LaBarba, Dean J.
    Becker, Lauren K.
    Chang, Patricia
    Farhoumand, Nojan
    Jennrich, Robert I.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2011, 9 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [50] Peer Coaching During Treatment Decision Making with Men Newly Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer
    Adkins, Aidan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED COACHING & MENTORING, 2021, : 110 - 124