Evaluation of Rail Decarbonization Alternatives: Framework and Application

被引:5
|
作者
Hernandez, Adrian [1 ]
Ng, Max T. M. [2 ]
Siddique, Nazib [3 ]
Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. [1 ]
Elgowainy, Amgad [3 ]
Mahmassani, Hani S. [2 ]
Wang, Michael [3 ]
Zhou, Yan [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Evanston, IL USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Transportat Ctr, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst & Infrastructure Anal, Lemont, IL USA
关键词
freight systems modeling; rail and intermodal freight; sustainability and resilience; decarbonization; transportation energy; life-cycle analysis; transportation network modeling and simulation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; UNITED-STATES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FREIGHT; SYSTEM; HYDROGEN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1177/03611981231170182
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Northwestern University Freight Rail Infrastructure & Energy Network Decarbonization (NUFRIEND) framework is a comprehensive industry-oriented tool for simulating the deployment of new energy technologies including biofuels, e-fuels, battery-electric, and hydrogen locomotives. By classifying fuel types into two categories based on deployment requirements, the associated optimal charging/fueling facility location and sizing problem are solved with a five-step framework. Life-cycle analysis (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are used to estimate carbon reduction, capital investments, cost of carbon reduction, and operational impacts, enabling sensitivity analysis with operational and technological parameters. The framework is illustrated on lower-carbon drop-in fuels as well as battery-electric technology deployments for the US Eastern and Western Class I railroad networks. Drop-in fuel deployments are modeled as admixtures with diesel in existing locomotives, while battery-electric deployments are shown for varying technology penetration levels and locomotive ranges. When mixed in a 50% ratio with diesel, results show biodiesel's capacity to reduce emissions at 36% with a cost of $ 0.13 per kilogram of CO2 reduced, while e-fuels offer a potential reduction of 50% of emissions at a cost of $ 0.22 per kilogram of CO2 reduced. Battery-electric results for 50% deployment over all ton-miles highlight the value of future innovations in battery energy densities as scenarios assuming 800-mi range locomotives show an estimated emissions reduction of 46% with a cost of $ 0.06 per kilogram of CO2 reduced, compared with 16% emissions reduction at a cost of $ 0.11 per kilogram of CO2 reduced for 400-mi range locomotives. The NUFRIEND framework provides a systematic method for comparing different alternative energy technologies and identifying potential challenges and benefits in their future deployments.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 121
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using Modeling All Alternatives to explore 55% decarbonization scenarios of the European electricity sector
    Pedersen, Tim T.
    Andersen, Mikael Skou
    Victoria, Marta
    Andresen, Gorm B.
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (05)
  • [32] A Review of Economic Incentives to Promote Decarbonization Alternatives in Maritime and Inland Waterway Transport Modes
    Camargo-Diaz, Clara Paola
    Paipa-Sanabria, Edwin
    Zapata-Cortes, Julian Andres
    Aguirre-Restrepo, Yamileth
    Quinones-Bolanos, Edgar Eduardo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [33] Exposing application alternatives
    Keleher, PJ
    Hollingsworth, JK
    Perkovic, D
    19TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 384 - 392
  • [34] A pathway design framework for national freight transport decarbonization strategies
    Briand, Yann
    Gupta, Dipti
    D'Agosto, Marcio de Almeida
    Goes, George Vasconcelos
    Goncalves, Daniel Neves Schmitz
    Garg, Amit
    Vishwanathan, Saritha Sudharmma
    Ahjum, Fadiel
    Trollip, Hilton
    McCall, Bryce
    Siagan, Ucok W. R.
    Dewi, Retno Gumilang
    Pye, Steve
    Combes, Francois
    Koning, Martin
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2024,
  • [35] Application of Envision for Enhanced Evaluation of Alternatives in Wastewater Utility Capital Improvement Projects
    Bowles, Evan C.
    Agustin, Evelio
    Bradley, Norman
    Vadiveloo, Enrique
    Mueller, James G.
    Ferguson, James B.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 2017: METHODOLOGY, 2017, : 32 - 44
  • [36] Probability-based prospect & risk evaluation of technology alternatives:: theory and application
    Bullinger, HJ
    Richter, M
    Nohe, P
    Kröll, M
    CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: THE WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING GRID, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 859 - 864
  • [37] Application of simultaneous evaluation of criteria and alternatives for prioritization of photovoltaic power plant location
    Lak, Khashayar
    Kashani, Arash Haghparast
    Azizi, Amir
    Karimi, Naser
    Hosseinpour, Morteza
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING-JOE, 2024, 2024 (11):
  • [38] EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT ALTERNATIVES
    BIERGANS, E
    BETRIEB, 1973, 26 (08): : 389 - 394
  • [39] Analysis and Evaluation of Alternatives
    Voronin, A. N.
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 45 (05) : 64 - 74
  • [40] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ALTERNATIVES
    BUSHARDT, SC
    FOWLER, AR
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 1988, 18 (10): : 40 - 44