Evaluation of Rail Decarbonization Alternatives: Framework and Application

被引:5
|
作者
Hernandez, Adrian [1 ]
Ng, Max T. M. [2 ]
Siddique, Nazib [3 ]
Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. [1 ]
Elgowainy, Amgad [3 ]
Mahmassani, Hani S. [2 ]
Wang, Michael [3 ]
Zhou, Yan [3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Evanston, IL USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Transportat Ctr, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Energy Syst & Infrastructure Anal, Lemont, IL USA
关键词
freight systems modeling; rail and intermodal freight; sustainability and resilience; decarbonization; transportation energy; life-cycle analysis; transportation network modeling and simulation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; UNITED-STATES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FREIGHT; SYSTEM; HYDROGEN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1177/03611981231170182
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The Northwestern University Freight Rail Infrastructure & Energy Network Decarbonization (NUFRIEND) framework is a comprehensive industry-oriented tool for simulating the deployment of new energy technologies including biofuels, e-fuels, battery-electric, and hydrogen locomotives. By classifying fuel types into two categories based on deployment requirements, the associated optimal charging/fueling facility location and sizing problem are solved with a five-step framework. Life-cycle analysis (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are used to estimate carbon reduction, capital investments, cost of carbon reduction, and operational impacts, enabling sensitivity analysis with operational and technological parameters. The framework is illustrated on lower-carbon drop-in fuels as well as battery-electric technology deployments for the US Eastern and Western Class I railroad networks. Drop-in fuel deployments are modeled as admixtures with diesel in existing locomotives, while battery-electric deployments are shown for varying technology penetration levels and locomotive ranges. When mixed in a 50% ratio with diesel, results show biodiesel's capacity to reduce emissions at 36% with a cost of $ 0.13 per kilogram of CO2 reduced, while e-fuels offer a potential reduction of 50% of emissions at a cost of $ 0.22 per kilogram of CO2 reduced. Battery-electric results for 50% deployment over all ton-miles highlight the value of future innovations in battery energy densities as scenarios assuming 800-mi range locomotives show an estimated emissions reduction of 46% with a cost of $ 0.06 per kilogram of CO2 reduced, compared with 16% emissions reduction at a cost of $ 0.11 per kilogram of CO2 reduced for 400-mi range locomotives. The NUFRIEND framework provides a systematic method for comparing different alternative energy technologies and identifying potential challenges and benefits in their future deployments.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 121
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abatement cost curve analysis of freight rail decarbonization alternatives
    Hernandez, Adrian
    Ng, Max T. M.
    Siddique, Choudhury
    Durango-Cohen, Pablo L.
    Mahmassani, Hani S.
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Wang, Michael
    Zhou , Yan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 134
  • [2] Review of Financing Mechanisms to Promote Decarbonization Alternatives in Rail and Inland Waterway Transport
    Camargo-Diaz, Clara Paola
    Paipa-Sanabria, Edwin
    Zapata-Cortes, Julian Andres
    Briceno-Chaves, Andres Mauricio
    Serna-Castano, Cristian Fernando
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [3] Simulation of urban rail operations: Application framework
    Koutsopoulos, Harls N.
    Wang, Zhigao
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, (2006) : 84 - 91
  • [4] Rail materials - Alternatives and their limits
    Mädler, Katrin
    Zoll, Andreas
    Heyde, René
    Brehmer, Marcel
    ZEV Rail Glasers Annalen, 2008, 132 (11-12): : 496 - 503
  • [5] Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation and ranking of environmental remediation alternatives: Identification and evaluation of alternatives
    Salter, P
    Smith, D
    Peil, K
    Ghassemi, A
    Weisband, S
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 149 - 154
  • [6] A Framework for Performance Evaluation of Communication Alternatives for Intelligent Transportation Systems
    Ma, Yongchang
    Zhou, Yan
    Chowdhury, Mashrur
    Wang, Kuang-Ching
    Fries, Ryan N.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 13 (03) : 111 - 126
  • [7] Decarbonization: Publishing Global Framework for Cities
    不详
    ATP MAGAZINE, 2021, (1-2): : 6 - 7
  • [8] Sustainable development of green buildings in China and evaluation framework of decarbonization technology of AAC production
    Chen, Chadwick
    ce/papers, 2022, 5 (05) : 36 - 42
  • [9] Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method in Evaluation of Rail Transit Connection
    Chen, Bing-Shuo
    He, Yu-Long
    Liu, Lei
    Chi, Jia-Xin
    Gao, Peng-Wang
    CICTP 2019: TRANSPORTATION IN CHINA-CONNECTING THE WORLD, 2019, : 1398 - 1409
  • [10] CARD: A Decision-Guidance Framework and Application for Recommending Composite Alternatives
    Brodsky, Alex
    Henshaw, Sylvia Morgan
    Whittle, Jon
    RECSYS'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS, 2008, : 171 - 178