A Pilot Study Comparing Sensation in Buried Versus Nonburied Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps

被引:2
|
作者
Lu Wang, Marcos [1 ]
Qin, Nancy [1 ]
Chadab, Tara M. [2 ]
Chen, Yunchan [1 ]
Huang, Hao [2 ]
Ellison, Angela [1 ]
Otterburn, David M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med, 525 E 68th St,Payson7-708, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; neurotization; nerve graft; sensation; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; TRAM FLAP; SENSIBILITY; IMPROVES; NEUROTIZATION; SENSITIVITY; OUTCOMES; RETURN;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003530
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundNeurotized deep inferior epigastic perforator (DIEP) flaps have been shown to improve sensory recovery after mastectomy and reconstruction. With the recent trend toward nipple-sparing mastectomies, sensation likely originates within the buried DIEP flap and then innervates the breast skin. In contrast, for patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomies, the DIEP flap skin is preserved, brought up to the surface, and directly innervated. In this study, we aim to evaluate inner breast region sensation between patients whose DIEP flap is buried and whose DIEP flap skin is brought to the surface.MethodsSeventy patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using the DIEP flap were prospectively identified. Of these, 60 patients underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with buried DIEP flap reconstruction while 10 patients underwent skin-sparing mastectomy with nonburied DIEP flap reconstruction. Patients in both cohorts received nerve grafting using the 70 x 1-2-mm Avance Nerve Graft in identical fashion. Sensitivity evaluation was performed in five inner breast regions (corresponding to the nonburied DIEP flap area).ResultsIn the buried DIEP cohort, at 6 months postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference in inner breast region sensitivity measurements compared with baseline levels (P < 0.001). In contrast, in the nonburied DIEP cohort, at 6 months postoperatively, sensation in the inner breast region was comparable with preoperative baseline levels (P = 0.236). At 24 months postoperatively, inner breast region sensitivity measurements in both cohorts were comparable with preoperative baseline measurements (P > 0.05).ConclusionsNeurotized DIEP flap skin raised directly to the surface confers earlier sensory recovery than buried DIEP flaps. In patients who undergo skin-sparing mastectomies with nonburied DIEP flap reconstruction, they can expect significantly better sensation in the inner regions of the breast at 6 months postoperatively. In patients who undergo nipple-sparing mastectomies with buried DIEP flap reconstruction, they can expect sensation in the inner breast to return to preoperative baseline levels at a later time point-beginning as early as 24 months postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:S574 / S577
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deconstructing the Reconstruction: Evaluation of Process and Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Ouyang, Yiye
    Li, Chengcheng
    Du, Xingyi
    Ma, Xiaomu
    Liu, Chunjun
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (06) : 816E - 817E
  • [22] Optimising the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction
    Miguel Casares Santiago
    Emilio García-Tutor
    Gil Rodríguez Caravaca
    Julián del Cerro González
    Léa Marie Klein
    Alberto Alonso-Burgos
    European Radiology, 2014, 24 : 2097 - 2108
  • [23] Bilateral breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps in slim patients
    Mani, Maria
    Saour, Samer
    Ramsey, Kelvin
    Power, Kieran
    Harris, Paul
    James, Stuart
    MICROSURGERY, 2018, 38 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [24] Three-Dimensional Visualization for Extended Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Cui, HuaiRui
    Ding, MaoCao
    Mao, YiHua
    Zhou, Peng
    Sun, ChenYou
    Tang, MaoLin
    Xu, DaChuan
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (06) : E48 - E53
  • [25] Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction:experience with 43 flaps
    YAN Xiao-qing YANG Hong-yan ZHAO Yu-ming YOU Lei XU Jun Division of Plastic Surgery
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2007, (05) : 380 - 384
  • [26] Characterizing Outcomes of Medial and Lateral Perforators in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Elver, Ashlie A.
    Matthews, Stephanie A.
    Egan, Katie G.
    Bowles, Eva L.
    Nazir, Niaman
    Flurry, Mitchell
    Holding, Julie
    Lai, Eric C.
    Butterworth, James A.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2023, 39 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [27] Abdominoplasty and Breast Augmentation with Outpatient Cosmetic Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Martinez, Carlos A.
    Boutros, Sean G.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (02) : 234E - 240E
  • [28] Breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps in EEC syndrome
    Nassab, R
    Lahiri, A
    Iqbal, A
    Waters, R
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2006, 59 (06): : 600 - 603
  • [29] Anatomical study of innervated transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps
    Mori, Hiroki
    Akita, Keiichi
    Hata, Yuiro
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2007, 29 (02) : 149 - 154
  • [30] Anatomical study of innervated transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps
    Hiroki Mori
    Keiichi Akita
    Yuiro Hata
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2007, 29 : 149 - 154