Sustainable functional urethral reconstruction improves early urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Jia, Zepeng [1 ]
Chen, Zeyu [2 ]
Chang, Yifan [1 ]
Wu, Cheng [3 ]
Qu, Min [1 ]
Nian, Xinwen [1 ]
Shen, Xianqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yun [1 ]
Tang, Shouyan [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Gao, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Naval Med Univ, Dept Hlth Stat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted surgery; urinary continence; urinary function; sustainable functional urethral reconstruction; randomised controlled trial; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; BLADDER NECK RECONSTRUCTION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; SURGICAL MARGINS; PRESERVATION; RECOVERY; CANCER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/bju.15956
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of sustainable functional urethral reconstruction (SFUR) on early recovery of urinary continence (UC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patients and MethodsOverall, 96 patients with primary prostate cancer were randomised into the SFUR or standard group (n = 48 each). The primary outcome was the 1-month UC recovery. Secondary outcomes included short-term (<= 3 months) UC recovery, urinary function, micturition-related bother, perioperative complications, and oncological outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the 3-month UC recovery. Generalised estimating equations were used to compare postoperative urinary function and micturition-related bother. ResultsThe 1-month UC recovery rates, median 24-h pad weights, and median operative time in the SFUR and standard groups were 73% and 49% (P = 0.017), 0 and 47 g (P = 0.001), and 125 and 103 min (P = 0.025), respectively. The UC recovery rates in the SFUR vs standard groups were 53% vs 23% at 1 week (P = 0.003), 53% vs 32% at 2 weeks (P = 0.038), and 93% vs 77% at 3 months (P = 0.025). The median time to UC recovery in the SFUR and standard groups was 5 and 34 days, respectively (log-rank P = 0.006); multivariable Cox regression supported this result (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.79, P = 0.024). Similar results were observed when UC was defined as 0 pads/day. Urinary function (P = 0.2) and micturition-related bother (P = 0.8) were similar at all follow-up intervals. The perioperative complication rates, positive surgical margin rates, and 1-year biochemical recurrence-free survival were comparable between both groups (all P > 0.05). ConclusionSFUR resulted in earlier UC recovery without compromising postoperative urinary function. Long-term validation and multicentre studies are required to confirm the results of this novel technique.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 728
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison in Efficacy of Periurethral Reconstruction Leading to Urinary Continence Improvement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Zhao, Xutu
    Li, Kaiwen
    Zhuang, Ruilin
    Liu, Hao
    He, Wang
    Dong, Wen
    Huang, Hai
    Huang, Jian
    Lin, Tianxin
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (13) : 8978 - 8985
  • [23] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: urinary continence and complications
    Patel, HRH
    Rosenbaum, R
    Madeb, R
    Vicente, I
    Joseph, JV
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 : 83 - 83
  • [24] Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation and Posterior Urethral Reconstruction during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Urinary Continence
    You, Youn Chul
    Kim, Tae Hyo
    Sung, Gyung Tak
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 53 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [25] Effect of a Modified Technique of Posterior Reconstruction by Iliopectineal Ligament Suspension During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy on Early Continence: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Atchia, Kaleem
    Turcotte, Bruno
    Cazes, Edouard
    Singbo, Narcisse
    Alhogbani, Mofarej
    Dujardin, Thierry
    UROLOGY, 2024, 193 : 116 - 122
  • [26] Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Morra, Ivano
    Chiarissi, Marco Lucci
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Grande, Susanna
    Ragni, Francesca
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Fiori, Cristian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 606 - 614
  • [27] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF THE RETZIUS-SPARING APPROACH ON EARLY URINARY CONTINENCE RECOVERY AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Jeong, Wooju
    Ashni-Prasad, Madhu
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Karabon, Patrick
    Diaz, Mireya
    Eleswarapu, Sriram
    Sammon, Jesse
    Baize, Brad
    Simone, Andrea
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E283 - E284
  • [28] Novel method of bladder neck imbrication improves early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Symons, J.
    Yuen, C.
    Benito, R. Pe
    Haynes, A. M.
    Savdie, R.
    Matthews, J.
    Brenner, P.
    Stricker, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A390 - A391
  • [29] THE USEFULNESS OF DOUBLE-LAYERED POSTERIOR RHABDOSPHINCTER RECONSTRUCTION ON EARLY RECOVERY OF URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Namiki, Kazunori
    Gondo, Tatsuo
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    Nakagami, Yoshihiro
    Iseki, Ryo
    Ozu, Choichiro
    Horiguchi, Yutaka
    Tachibana, Masaaki
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A313 - A313
  • [30] Re: Early Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Older Australian Men
    Griebling, Tomas L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (02): : 354 - 355