Sustainable functional urethral reconstruction improves early urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Jia, Zepeng [1 ]
Chen, Zeyu [2 ]
Chang, Yifan [1 ]
Wu, Cheng [3 ]
Qu, Min [1 ]
Nian, Xinwen [1 ]
Shen, Xianqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yun [1 ]
Tang, Shouyan [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Gao, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Naval Med Univ, Dept Hlth Stat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted surgery; urinary continence; urinary function; sustainable functional urethral reconstruction; randomised controlled trial; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; BLADDER NECK RECONSTRUCTION; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; SURGICAL MARGINS; PRESERVATION; RECOVERY; CANCER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/bju.15956
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of sustainable functional urethral reconstruction (SFUR) on early recovery of urinary continence (UC) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patients and MethodsOverall, 96 patients with primary prostate cancer were randomised into the SFUR or standard group (n = 48 each). The primary outcome was the 1-month UC recovery. Secondary outcomes included short-term (<= 3 months) UC recovery, urinary function, micturition-related bother, perioperative complications, and oncological outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the 3-month UC recovery. Generalised estimating equations were used to compare postoperative urinary function and micturition-related bother. ResultsThe 1-month UC recovery rates, median 24-h pad weights, and median operative time in the SFUR and standard groups were 73% and 49% (P = 0.017), 0 and 47 g (P = 0.001), and 125 and 103 min (P = 0.025), respectively. The UC recovery rates in the SFUR vs standard groups were 53% vs 23% at 1 week (P = 0.003), 53% vs 32% at 2 weeks (P = 0.038), and 93% vs 77% at 3 months (P = 0.025). The median time to UC recovery in the SFUR and standard groups was 5 and 34 days, respectively (log-rank P = 0.006); multivariable Cox regression supported this result (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.79, P = 0.024). Similar results were observed when UC was defined as 0 pads/day. Urinary function (P = 0.2) and micturition-related bother (P = 0.8) were similar at all follow-up intervals. The perioperative complication rates, positive surgical margin rates, and 1-year biochemical recurrence-free survival were comparable between both groups (all P > 0.05). ConclusionSFUR resulted in earlier UC recovery without compromising postoperative urinary function. Long-term validation and multicentre studies are required to confirm the results of this novel technique.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 728
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Benefit of Posterior Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction in Early Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Salazar, Aina
    Regis, Lucas
    Planas, Jacques
    Celma, Anna
    Santamaria, Anna
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (04): : 460 - 463
  • [2] POSTERIOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE RHABDOSPHINCTER IMPROVES EARLY RECOVERY OF URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Pushkar, Dmitry
    Govorov, Alexander
    Rasner, Pavel
    Kolontarev, Konstantin
    Rocco, Bernardo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E1045 - E1046
  • [3] A randomised controlled trial to assess the benefit of posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction in early urinary continence recovery after robot assisted radical prostatectomy
    Moreno, O.
    Regis, L.
    Salazar, A.
    Planas, J.
    Celma, A.
    Santamaria, A.
    Trilla, E.
    Morote, J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1634 - S1634
  • [4] A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL TO ASSESS THE BENEFIT OF POSTERIOR RHABDOSPHINCTER RECONSTRUCTION IN EARLY URINARY CONTINENCE RECOVERY AFTER ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Regis, Lucas
    Moreno, Oriol
    Salazar, Aina
    Planas, Jacques
    Celma, Ana
    Santamaria, Anna
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E362 - E362
  • [5] URETHRAL FIXATION: A NOVEL TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE EARLY URINARY CONTINENCE RECOVERY AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Rossanese, Marta
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Alario, Giuseppe
    Mucciardi, Giuseppe
    Isgro, Antonino
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E268 - E268
  • [6] RETZIUS-SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IMPROVES EARLY RECOVERY OF URINARY CONTINENCE: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Li, Youjian
    Guo, Hongqian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E302 - E302
  • [7] IMPACT OF POSTERIOR URETHROVESICAL RECONSTRUCTION ON EARLY RETURN TO CONTINENCE AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Hoogenes, Jen
    Wu, Christopher
    Wang, Yuding
    Patterson, Lisa
    Matsumoto, Edward
    Shayegan, Bobby
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E1046 - E1046
  • [8] Continence definition and prognostic factors for early urinary continence recovery in posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial
    Salazar, A.
    Regis, L.
    Planas, J.
    Celma, A.
    Trilla, E.
    Morote, J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2022, 46 (03): : 159 - 166
  • [9] Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 287 - 291
  • [10] OUTCOMES AND PREDICTORS FOR EARLY RETURN OF URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Chauhan, S.
    Orvieto, M.
    Coelho, R. F.
    Rocco, B.
    Sivaraman, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 311 - 312