Impact of blood involvement on efficacy and time to response with mogamulizumab in mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome

被引:10
|
作者
Beylot-Barry, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Booken, Nina [3 ]
Weishaupt, Carsten [4 ]
Scarisbrick, Julia [5 ]
Wu, Wende [6 ]
Rosen, Jan-Paul [7 ]
Medley, Michael C. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, UMR 1312, INSERM, Bordeaux, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Dermatol Dept, Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Dermatol & Venereol, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Dermatol, Munster, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Kyowa Kirin Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[7] Kyowa Kirin Int, Marlow, Bucks, England
关键词
INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; CLASSIFICATION; ORGANIZATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/jdv.18549
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are rare types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which present in skin. Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sezary syndrome (SS) are subtypes which make up two-thirds of all CTCL cases. The phase 3 MAVORIC study (NCT01728805) compared mogamulizumab to vorinostat in MF and SS patients, with post hoc data showing a trend for higher efficacy in mogamulizumab-treated patients as baseline blood tumour burden increases. Objectives The aim of this study was to use updated post hoc analyses in order to examine the efficacy of mogamulizumab and vorinostat in MF patients when stratified by baseline blood involvement and to determine what factors affect time-to-global and time-to-skin response to inform clinical follow-up. Methods Post hoc analyses were carried out using data from MAVORIC. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) data were used to assess efficacy in patients with MF. Time-to-global response (TTR) was examined by disease subtype, by blood involvement in MF patients, and time-to-skin response was examined by blood involvement in MF patients. Results Numerically superior results were seen for ORR, PFS and TTNT in mogamulizumab-treated patients with MF compared with vorinostat, with a trend for outcomes improving with increasing baseline blood class. Statistically significant results for mogamulizumab compared with vorinostat were seen for MF B1 pts for PFS (8.43 vs. 2.83 months, p = 0.003) and TTNT (11.9 vs. 3.13 months, p = 0.002), and for MF B2 pts for ORR (46.2 vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.033). Conclusions In mogamulizumab-treated MF patients, ORR and PFS were seen to improve with increasing blood involvement, which led to improved TTNT. TTR was more predictable for mogamulizumab-treated MF patients with blood involvement, and skin response may take longer than previously reported in some patients.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 316
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in blood involvement in Sezary syndrome positively correlate with skin severity but not in mycosis fungoides
    Wernham, A.
    Stranzenbach, R.
    Stadler, R.
    Ortiz, P.
    Guenova, E.
    Quaglino, P.
    Hodak, E.
    Papadavid, E.
    Wehkamp, U.
    Evison, F.
    Bagot, M.
    Scarisbrick, J.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 138 (05) : S92 - S92
  • [22] Characterization of Skin Response in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome Treated with Mogamulizumab: A Retrospective, Real World Cohort
    Christensen, Rachel
    Stuver, Robert
    Dusza, Stephen
    Epstein-Peterson, Zachary D.
    Ghione, Paola
    Horwitz, Steven
    Johnson, William T.
    Moskowitz, Alison
    Myskowski, Patricia
    Pulitzer, Melissa
    Geller, Shamir
    BLOOD, 2024, 144 : 7790 - 7791
  • [23] Clinical Characterization of Mogamulizumab-Associated Rash During Treatment of Mycosis Fungoides or Sezary Syndrome
    Hirotsu, Kelsey E.
    Neal, Tatiana M.
    Khodadoust, Michael S.
    Wang, Jennifer Y.
    Rieger, Kerri E.
    Strelo, Jenna
    Hong, Eric
    Kim, Youn H.
    Kwong, Bernice Y.
    JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 157 (06) : 700 - 707
  • [24] Real-world experience of using mogamulizumab in relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome
    Molloy, K.
    Vico, C.
    Ortiz-Romero, P. L.
    Scarisbrick, J. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 184 (05) : 978 - 981
  • [25] Pathogenesis of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome
    Sokolowska-Wojdylo, Malgorzata
    Jankowska-Konsur, Alina
    Grzanka, Aleksandra
    Maciejewska-Radomska, Agata
    PRZEGLAD DERMATOLOGICZNY, 2012, 99 (03): : 235 - 240
  • [26] MYCOSIS-FUNGOIDES AND SEZARY SYNDROME
    SOUTEYRAND, P
    THIVOLET, J
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1981, 171 (02) : 240 - 261
  • [27] Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome: An Update
    Larocca, Cecilia
    Kupper, Thomas
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 33 (01) : 103 - +
  • [28] Diagnostics in mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome
    Olek-Hrab, Karolina
    Silny, Wojciech
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2014, 19 (02) : 72 - 76
  • [29] Mycosis fungoides and Sezary Syndrome: An update
    Kim E.J.
    Lin J.
    Junkins-Hopkins J.M.
    Vittorio C.C.
    Rook A.H.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2006, 8 (5) : 376 - 386
  • [30] SEZARY SYNDROME (MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES VARIANT)
    COLBURN, HL
    BEGGS, DW
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1965, 91 (06) : 682 - &