Agricultural origins of corporate pro-environmental behavior

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Qian [1 ]
Wang, Jianan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Int Studies Univ, Sch Business & Management, 550 West Dalian Rd, Shanghai 200083, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecological environment; Rice culture; Agricultural production; Pro-environmental behavior; Policy; Migration; NATIONAL CULTURE; INNOVATION EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; RESPONSIBILITY; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137456
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The cultural differences caused by rice cultivation between the north and south of China provide a unique perspective to study the local effect on corporate pro-environmental behavior. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the geographical distribution of agricultural planting and corporate pro-environmental behavior. We manually collected the city-level rice planting data and used A-share listed companies' data from 2010 to 2019 in China and found that rice culture in the external environment in which the company embedded has a positive association with the corporate reactive pro-environmental behavior, while rice culture in the internal values which CEO provided with is positively related to the corporate proactive pro environmental behavior. Moreover, we find that environmental policy and migration are two moderators through which rice culture affects corporate pro-environmental behavior. This study not only sheds light on the agricultural drivers behind corporate pro-environmental behavior and extends the theoretical understanding how cultural differences caused by geographical factors within countries influence corporate decisions but also helps firms, managers, and stakeholders effectively conduct self-reflection, management, and supervision on environmental issues through farming cultural dimensions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude
    Bissing-Olson, Megan J.
    Iyer, Aarti
    Fielding, Kelly S.
    Zacher, Hannes
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 34 (02) : 156 - 175
  • [32] Employee–Organization Pro-environmental Values Fit and Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Supervisors’ Personal Values
    Hui Lu
    Xia Liu
    Hong Chen
    Ruyin Long
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2019, 25 : 519 - 557
  • [33] An Evolutionary Approach Toward Pro-environmental Behavior
    Mykolas Simas Poškus
    Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2021, 7 : 69 - 75
  • [34] Team GHRM and Team Pro-environmental behavior
    Farrukh, Muhammad
    Raza, Ali
    Rafiq, Muhammad
    Ansari, Nabeel
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [35] Nudging pro-environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities
    Byerly, Hilary
    Balmford, Andrew
    Ferraro, Paul J.
    Wagner, Courtney Hammond
    Palchak, Elizabeth
    Polasky, Stephen
    Ricketts, Taylor H.
    Schwartz, Aaron J.
    Fisher, Brendan
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 16 (03) : 159 - 168
  • [36] An Evolutionary Approach Toward Pro-environmental Behavior
    Poskus, Mykolas Simas
    EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 7 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [37] The Impact of Personal Values on Pro-Environmental Behavior
    Hoshyar, Vajihe
    Behboodi, Omid
    Saeed, Seyede Farnaz Ahmadi
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HOSPITALITY & TOURISM, 2024, 25 (05) : 1220 - 1246
  • [38] What is measured in pro-environmental behavior research?
    Lange, Florian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 98
  • [39] Roles of Environmental Knowledge in Promoting Agricultural Students' Pro-Environmental Behaviors
    Nahavandian, F.
    Naeimi, A.
    Ranjbar, B.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 24 (05): : 1057 - 1071
  • [40] Celebrity endorsement in promoting pro-environmental behavior
    Ho, Thong Quoc
    Nie, Zihan
    Alpizar, Francisco
    Carlsson, Fredrik
    Nam, Pham Khanh
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2022, 198 : 68 - 86