Exploring Capabilities of Large Language Models such as ChatGPT in Radiation

被引:14
|
作者
Dennstadt, Fabio [1 ]
Hastings, Janna [2 ,3 ]
Putora, Paul Martin [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Vu, Erwin [1 ]
Fischer, Galina F. [1 ]
Suveg, Krisztian [1 ]
Glatzer, Markus [1 ]
Riggenbach, Elena [4 ,5 ]
Ha, Hong-Linh [4 ,5 ]
Cihoric, Nikola [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital St Gallen, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Univ St Gallen, Sch Med, St Gallen, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Implementat Sci Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
ONCOLOGY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2023.101400
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Technological progress of machine learning and natural language processing has led to the development of large language models (LLMs), capable of producing well -formed text responses and providing natural language access to knowledge. Modern conversational LLMs such as ChatGPT have shown remarkable capabilities across a variety of fields, including medicine. These models may assess even highly specialized medical knowledge within specific disciplines, such as radiation therapy. We conducted an exploratory study to examine the capabilities of ChatGPT to answer questions in radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: A set of multiple-choice questions about clinical, physics, and biology general knowledge in radiation oncology as well as a set of open-ended questions were created. These were given as prompts to the LLM ChatGPT, and the answers were collected and analyzed. For the multiple-choice questions, it was checked how many of the answers of the model could be clearly assigned to one of the allowed multiple -choice -answers, and the proportion of correct answers was determined. For the open-ended questions, independent blinded radiation oncologists evaluated the quality of the answers regarding correctness and usefulness on a 5point Likert scale. Furthermore, the evaluators were asked to provide suggestions for improving the quality of the answers. Results: For 70 multiple-choice questions, ChatGPT gave valid answers in 66 cases (94.3%). In 60.61% of the valid answers, the selected answer was correct (50.0% of clinical questions, 78.6% of physics questions, and 58.3% of biology questions). For 25 open-ended questions, 12 answers of ChatGPT were considered as "acceptable," "good," or "very good" regarding both correctness and helpfulness by all 6 participating radiation oncologists. Overall, the answers were considered "very good" in 29.3% and 28%, "good" in 28% and 29.3%, "acceptable" in 19.3% and 19.3%, "bad" in 9.3% and 9.3%, and "very bad" in 14% and 14% regarding correctness/helpfulness. Conclusions: Modern conversational LLMs such as ChatGPT can provide satisfying answers to many relevant questions in radiation therapy. As they still fall short of consistently providing correct information, it is problematic to use them for obtaining medical information. As LLMs will further improve in the future, they are expected to have an increasing impact not only on general society, but also on clinical practice, including radiation oncology. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
    Kasneci, Enkelejda
    Sessler, Kathrin
    Kuechemann, Stefan
    Bannert, Maria
    Dementieva, Daryna
    Fischer, Frank
    Gasser, Urs
    Groh, Georg
    Guennemann, Stephan
    Huellermeier, Eyke
    Krusche, Stepha
    Kutyniok, Gitta
    Michaeli, Tilman
    Nerdel, Claudia
    Pfeffer, Juergen
    Poquet, Oleksandra
    Sailer, Michael
    Schmidt, Albrecht
    Seidel, Tina
    Stadler, Matthias
    Weller, Jochen
    Kuhn, Jochen
    Kasneci, Gjergji
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2023, 103
  • [32] Probing into the Fairness of Large Language Models: A Case Study of ChatGPT
    Li, Yunqi
    Zhang, Lanjing
    Zhang, Yongfeng
    2024 58TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES AND SYSTEMS, CISS, 2024,
  • [33] Exploring the capabilities of ChatGPT in academic research recommendation
    Haman, Michael
    Skolnik, Milan
    RESUSCITATION, 2023, 187
  • [34] The use of ChatGPT and other large language models in surgical science
    Janssen, Boris, V
    Kazemier, Geert
    Besselink, Marc G.
    BJS OPEN, 2023, 7 (02):
  • [35] Do Large Language Models Understand Chemistry? A Conversation with ChatGPT
    Nascimento, Cayque Monteiro Castro
    Pimentel, Andre Silva
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2023, 63 (06) : 1649 - 1655
  • [36] The Security of Using Large Language Models:A Survey With Emphasis on ChatGPT
    Wei Zhou
    Xiaogang Zhu
    QingLong Han
    Lin Li
    Xiao Chen
    Sheng Wen
    Yang Xiang
    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2025, 12 (01) : 1 - 26
  • [37] The wide range of opportunities for large language models such as ChatGPT in rheumatology
    Hugle, Thomas
    RMD OPEN, 2023, 9 (02):
  • [38] Large language models (LLM) and ChatGPT: a medical student perspective
    Arachchige, Arosh S. Perera Molligoda S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (08) : 2248 - 2249
  • [39] Large Language Models Like ChatGPT in ABME: Author Guidelines
    Carly Norris
    Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 51 : 1121 - 1122
  • [40] Evaluation of ChatGPT and Gemini large language models for pharmacometrics with NONMEM
    Shin, Euibeom
    Yu, Yifan
    Bies, Robert R.
    Ramanathan, Murali
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2024, 51 (03) : 187 - 197