Development and validation of machine-learning models for the difficulty of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy based on radiomics

被引:3
|
作者
Sun, Shiwei [1 ]
Yao, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Yue [1 ]
Yue, Peng [1 ]
Guo, Fuyu [1 ]
Deng, Xiaoqian [1 ]
Zhang, Yangang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 3, Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Tongji Shanxi Hosp,Shanxi Acad Med Sci, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
adrenal tumor; laparoscopy; retroperitoneal space; machine learning; radiomics; random forest; extreme gradient boosting; PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA; TUMOR;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2023.1265790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe aim is to construct machine learning (ML) prediction models for the difficulty of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RPLA) based on clinical and radiomic characteristics and to validate the models.MethodsPatients who had undergone RPLA at Shanxi Bethune Hospital between August 2014 and December 2020 were retrospectively gathered. They were then randomly split into a training set and a validation set, maintaining a ratio of 7:3. The model was constructed using the training set and validated using the validation set. Furthermore, a total of 117 patients were gathered between January and December 2021 to form a prospective set for validation. Radiomic features were extracted by drawing the region of interest using the 3D slicer image computing platform and Python. Key features were selected through LASSO, and the radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. Various ML models were constructed by combining Rad-score with clinical characteristics. The optimal models were selected based on precision, recall, the area under the curve, F1 score, calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis in the training, validation, and prospective sets. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to demonstrate the impact of each variable in the respective models.ResultsAfter comparing the performance of 7 ML models in the training, validation, and prospective sets, it was found that the RF model had a more stable predictive performance, while xGBoost can significantly benefit patients. According to SHAP, the variable importance of the two models is similar, and both can reflect that the Rad-score has the most significant impact. At the same time, clinical characteristics such as hemoglobin, age, body mass index, gender, and diabetes mellitus also influenced the difficulty.ConclusionThis study constructed ML models for predicting the difficulty of RPLA by combining clinical and radiomic characteristics. The models can help surgeons evaluate surgical difficulty, reduce risks, and improve patient benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and validation of three machine-learning models for predicting multiple organ failure in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis
    Qiu Qiu
    Yong-jian Nian
    Yan Guo
    Liang Tang
    Nan Lu
    Liang-zhi Wen
    Bin Wang
    Dong-feng Chen
    Kai-jun Liu
    BMC Gastroenterology, 19
  • [42] Developing and Improving Risk Models using Machine-learning Based Algorithms
    Wang, Yan
    Ni, Xuelei Sherry
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ANNUAL ACM SOUTHEAST CONFERENCE (ACMSE 2019), 2019, : 281 - 282
  • [43] Advancing interpretability of machine-learning prediction models
    Trenary, Laurie
    DelSole, Timothy
    ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SCIENCE, 2022, 1
  • [44] The development of classification-based machine-learning models for the toxicity assessment of chemicals associated with plastic packaging
    Hossain, Md Mobarak
    Roy, Kunal
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2025, 484
  • [45] Synchronization of chaotic systems and their machine-learning models
    Weng, Tongfeng
    Yang, Huijie
    Gu, Changgui
    Zhang, Jie
    Small, Michael
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2019, 99 (04)
  • [46] Machine-learning models for combinatorial catalyst discovery
    Landrum, GA
    Penzotti, J
    Putta, S
    COMBINATORIAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE METHODS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE II, 2004, 804 : 301 - 306
  • [47] Machine-learning models for combinatorial catalyst discovery
    Landrum, GA
    Penzotti, JE
    Putta, S
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) : 270 - 277
  • [48] Beyond Development: Challenges in Deploying Machine-Learning Models for Structural Engineering Applications
    Zaker Esteghamati, Mohsen
    Bean, Brennan
    Burton, Henry V.
    Naser, M.Z.
    Journal of Structural Engineering, 2025, 151 (06)
  • [49] SAnDReS 2.0: Development of machine-learning models to explore the scoring function space
    de Azevedo Jr, Walter Filgueira
    Quiroga, Rodrigo
    Villarreal, Marcos Ariel
    da Silveira, Nelson Jose Freitas
    Bitencourt-Ferreira, Gabriela
    da Silva, Amauri Duarte
    Veit-Acosta, Martina
    Oliveira, Patricia Rufino
    Tutone, Marco
    Biziukova, Nadezhda
    Poroikov, Vladimir
    Tarasova, Olga
    Baud, Stephaine
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 45 (27) : 2333 - 2346
  • [50] The Importance of Interpretability and Validations of Machine-Learning Models
    Yamasawa, Daisuke
    Ozawa, Hideki
    Goto, Shinichi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2024, 88 (01) : 157 - 158