Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm

被引:5
|
作者
Shahid, Muhammad Asim [1 ]
Alam, Muhammad Mansoor [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Su'ud, Mazliham Mohd [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kuala Lumpur, Malaysian Inst Informat Technol, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Riphah Int Univ, Fac Comp, Sect 1-14, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Comp Sci, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
[4] Multimedia Univ, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya, Malaysia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0284209
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The benefits and opportunities offered by cloud computing are among the fastest-growing technologies in the computer industry. Additionally, it addresses the difficulties and issues that make more users more likely to accept and use the technology. The proposed research comprised of machine learning (ML) algorithms is Naive Bayes (NB), Library Support Vector Machine (LibSVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Random Forest (RF) to compare the classifier gives better results in accuracy and less fault prediction. In this research, the secondary data results (CPU-Mem Mono) give the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction on the NB classifier in terms of 80/20 (77.01%), 70/30 (76.05%), and 5 folds cross-validation (74.88%), and (CPU-Mem Multi) in terms of 80/20 (89.72%), 70/30 (90.28%), and 5 folds cross-validation (92.83%). Furthermore, on (HDD Mono) the SMO classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction fault in terms of 80/20 (87.72%), 70/30 (89.41%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.38%), and (HDD-Multi) in terms of 80/20 (93.64%), 70/30 (90.91%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.20%). Whereas, primary data results found RF classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction in terms of 80/20 (97.14%), 70/30 (96.19%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.85%) in the primary data results, but the algorithm complexity (0.17 seconds) is not good. In terms of 80/20 (95.71%), 70/30 (95.71%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.71%), SMO has the second highest accuracy and less fault prediction, but the algorithm complexity is good (0.3 seconds). The difference in accuracy and less fault prediction between RF and SMO is only (.13%), and the difference in time complexity is (14 seconds). We have decided that we will modify SMO. Finally, the Modified Sequential Minimal Optimization (MSMO) Algorithm method has been proposed to get the highest accuracy & less fault prediction errors in terms of 80/20 (96.42%), 70/30 (96.42%), & 5 fold cross validation (96.50%).
引用
收藏
页数:63
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved Antlion Optimization Algorithm via Tournament Selection
    Kilic, Haydar
    Yuzgec, Ugur
    2017 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (CICN), 2017, : 200 - 205
  • [32] Modified K-NN algorithm for classification problems with improved accuracy
    Sahu S.K.
    Kumar P.
    Singh A.P.
    International Journal of Information Technology, 2018, 10 (1) : 65 - 70
  • [33] An Improved Grey Correlation Algorithm and Its Application for Diesel Fault Prediction
    Yin, Zhentie
    Han, Bing
    Xie, Siqi
    2015 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICICIP), 2015, : 412 - 416
  • [34] Fault prediction for the actuators of civil aircraft based on an improved TSVR algorithm
    Zhang, Junwei
    Guo, Runxia
    Dong, Jiankang
    2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, CYBERNETICS AND COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS (ICCSS), 2017, : 259 - 266
  • [35] Design of Transformer Substation Fault Prediction Algorithm Based on Modified ESN
    Si Gang-quan
    Zhang Hong-ying
    Hu Luona
    2012 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2012,
  • [36] An Improved Bayesian Optimization Algorithm for Fault Identification on Flight Control System
    Liu, Xiaoxiong
    Shi, Jingping
    Zhang, Weiguo
    Wu, Yan
    2008 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 825 - +
  • [37] Online sequential prediction via incremental parsing: The Active LeZi algorithm
    Gopalratnam, Karthik
    Cook, Diane J.
    IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [38] Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm with LSTM for Stock Index Prediction
    Sun, Yu
    Mutalib, Sofianita
    Tian, Liwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2025, 16 (01) : 283 - 295
  • [39] Prediction techniques based on linear regression and sequential minimal optimization for stream time series
    Vo, Van
    Luo, Jiawei
    Vo, Bay
    ICIC Express Letters, 2014, 8 (01): : 15 - 21
  • [40] Optimization of Power Prediction of BP Network with Improved Pelican Algorithm
    Hui, Lichuan
    Li, Yao
    Zan, Lizhi
    2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEM, EECS 2024, 2024, 2800