Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm

被引:5
|
作者
Shahid, Muhammad Asim [1 ]
Alam, Muhammad Mansoor [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Su'ud, Mazliham Mohd [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kuala Lumpur, Malaysian Inst Informat Technol, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Riphah Int Univ, Fac Comp, Sect 1-14, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Comp Sci, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
[4] Multimedia Univ, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya, Malaysia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0284209
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The benefits and opportunities offered by cloud computing are among the fastest-growing technologies in the computer industry. Additionally, it addresses the difficulties and issues that make more users more likely to accept and use the technology. The proposed research comprised of machine learning (ML) algorithms is Naive Bayes (NB), Library Support Vector Machine (LibSVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Random Forest (RF) to compare the classifier gives better results in accuracy and less fault prediction. In this research, the secondary data results (CPU-Mem Mono) give the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction on the NB classifier in terms of 80/20 (77.01%), 70/30 (76.05%), and 5 folds cross-validation (74.88%), and (CPU-Mem Multi) in terms of 80/20 (89.72%), 70/30 (90.28%), and 5 folds cross-validation (92.83%). Furthermore, on (HDD Mono) the SMO classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction fault in terms of 80/20 (87.72%), 70/30 (89.41%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.38%), and (HDD-Multi) in terms of 80/20 (93.64%), 70/30 (90.91%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.20%). Whereas, primary data results found RF classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction in terms of 80/20 (97.14%), 70/30 (96.19%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.85%) in the primary data results, but the algorithm complexity (0.17 seconds) is not good. In terms of 80/20 (95.71%), 70/30 (95.71%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.71%), SMO has the second highest accuracy and less fault prediction, but the algorithm complexity is good (0.3 seconds). The difference in accuracy and less fault prediction between RF and SMO is only (.13%), and the difference in time complexity is (14 seconds). We have decided that we will modify SMO. Finally, the Modified Sequential Minimal Optimization (MSMO) Algorithm method has been proposed to get the highest accuracy & less fault prediction errors in terms of 80/20 (96.42%), 70/30 (96.42%), & 5 fold cross validation (96.50%).
引用
收藏
页数:63
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Improved Algorithm for Parallelizing Sequential Minimal Optimization
    Li, C. R.
    Guo, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (ITMS 2015), 2015, 34 : 1352 - 1355
  • [2] Single sequential minimal optimization: An improved SVMs training algorithm
    Liu, YZ
    Yao, HX
    Gao, W
    Zhao, DB
    Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Vols 1-9, 2005, : 4360 - 4364
  • [3] VLSI Design of Modified Sequential Minimal Optimization Algorithm for Fast SVM Training
    Feng, Lichen
    Li, Zunchao
    Wang, Yuanfa
    Zheng, Chuang
    Guan, Yunhe
    2016 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOLID-STATE AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY (ICSICT), 2016, : 627 - 629
  • [4] An improved code selection algorithm for fault prediction
    Yin Kuang
    Zhang Yi
    Lei Zhang
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2013, 22 : 1763 - 1772
  • [5] An improved code selection algorithm for fault prediction
    Kuang, Yin
    Yi, Zhang
    Zhang, Lei
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2013, 22 (7-8): : 1763 - 1772
  • [6] Improved Parallel Algorithms for Sequential Minimal Optimization of Classification Problems
    Wei, Wenjing
    Li, Changrong
    Guo, Jun
    IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS / IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY / IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS (HPCC/SMARTCITY/DSS), 2018, : 6 - 13
  • [7] Retail Default Prediction by Using Sequential Minimal Optimization Technique
    Hu, Yu-Chiang
    Ansell, Jake
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2009, 28 (08) : 651 - 666
  • [8] A novel sequential minimal optimization algorithm for support vector regression
    Guo, Jun
    Takahashi, Norikazu
    Nishi, Tetsuo
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4232 : 827 - 836
  • [9] VLSI Design of Sequential Minimal Optimization Algorithm for SVM Learning
    Kuan, Ta-Wen
    Wang, Jhing-Fa
    Wang, Jia-Ching
    Gu, Gaung-Hui
    ISCAS: 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 2509 - 2512
  • [10] An extrapolated sequential minimal optimization algorithm for support vector machines
    Lai, D
    Mani, N
    Palaniswami, M
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SENSING AND INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2004, : 415 - 421