Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce

被引:52
|
作者
de Boer, Noortje [1 ]
Raaphorst, Nadine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Sch Governance, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Street-level bureaucracy; automation; discretion; digitalization; enforcement; ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; IRON CAGE; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; STYLES; BIASES;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A dominant assumption in the street-level bureaucracy literature is that bureaucrats' discretion is curtailed by automated systems. Drawing on survey and factual data (n = 549) from Dutch inspectors, we test the effect of automation on enforcement style and whether this can be explained by discretion-as-perceived. Our results show that automation (1) increases bureaucrats' legal and accommodation style; (2) discretion-as-perceived does not mediate this effect; but (3) automation does decrease discretion-as-perceived. The main implication is that we do not find empirical evidence for curtailment and future research should move beyond discretion to understand effects of digital systems on bureaucrats' behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 62
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条