Comparative analysis of standard, tubeless and total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Kamble, Vaibhav Balu [1 ]
Gupta, Sandeep [2 ]
Pal, Dilip Kumar [3 ]
机构
[1] IPGME & R SSKM Hosp, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[2] Burdwan Med Coll, Dept Urol, Burdwan, W Bengal, India
[3] IPGME & R SSKM Hosp, Dept Urol, Kolkata 700020, W Bengal, India
关键词
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; VAS post op score; hospital stay; double J stent; urinary leak; NEPHROSTOMY DRAINAGE; SMALL-BORE; STONES;
D O I
10.1177/03915603231203434
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study was done to review and compare safety, effectiveness and advantages of total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), tubeless PCNL with standard PCNL.Methodology: This prospective comparative study involving 30 patients in each total tubeless PCNL, tubeless PCNL and standard PCNL group from Feb 2021 to June 2022.Result: Significant difference was found in mean duration of surgery (p < 0.01), mean hospital stay (p < 0.01), mean VAS post op score (p < 0.01), mean time to return to normal activity (p < 0.01) in total and tubeless PCNL group as compared with standard PCNL. While no significant difference found in mean haemoglobin drop (p = 0.1417), blood transfusion (p = 3721), incidence of urine leak (p = 0.13), need of accessory secondary procedure (p = 0.1322) and associated complications (p = 0.5939) among three groups.Conclusion: Study observed that total tubeless, tubeless PCNL is a safe and efficient technique. It is significantly associated with the advantages of shorter hospital stay, shorter time to return to normal activity, lower postoperative pain scores. Total tubeless PCNL obviates need of second procedure of removing DJ stent. Standard, tubeless and total tubeless PCNL have similar post op complication rate. Study thus concludes that total tubeless, tubeless PCNL can be used as a substitute for traditional standard PCNL.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 331
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 : A149 - A149
  • [42] Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis
    Yang Xun
    Qing Wang
    Henglong Hu
    Yuchao Lu
    Jiaqiao Zhang
    Baolong Qin
    Yudi Geng
    Shaogang Wang
    BMC Urology, 17
  • [43] Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis
    Xun, Yang
    Wang, Qing
    Hu, Henglong
    Lu, Yuchao
    Zhang, Jiaqiao
    Qin, Baolong
    Geng, Yudi
    Wang, Shaogang
    BMC UROLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [44] THE COMPARATION OF TOTALLY TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND CONVENTIONAL PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Hai, L.
    Kong, X.
    Gu, X.
    Zhang, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 19 : 175 - 175
  • [45] Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy Comment
    Desai, Mahesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 26 (01) : 24 - 25
  • [46] TUBELESS PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN CHILDREN
    Haghighi, Ramin
    Etemadian, Masoud
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A155 - A155
  • [47] Truly tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Cetti, R. J.
    Keoghane, S. R.
    Walmsley, B. H.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (03) : 269 - 269
  • [48] Re: Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
    Kurtulus, Fatih O.
    Tandogdu, Zafer
    Fazlioglu, Adem
    UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (02): : 189 - 190
  • [49] Totally tubeless (tubeless and stentless) percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients
    Kara, Cengiz
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Bozkurt, Omer Faruk
    Bayindir, Mirze
    Cicekbilek, Izzet
    Unsal, Ali
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 35 (03): : 241 - 249
  • [50] A Report on Safety Analysis of Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Zhao, Yan
    Zhou, Jiahe
    Shi, Zhenduo
    Han, Conghui
    CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2015, 72 (02) : 481 - 483