Evaluation of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Jiang, Sijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Shaobing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tang, Qingping [4 ]
Zhang, Hua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Zhihai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Junyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Weihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Hunan Prov Key Lab Otolaryngol Crit Dis, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Xiangya Hosp, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Brain Hosp Hunan Prov, Dept Rehabil, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
YOUNG-ADULTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS; TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1155/2023/9377518
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background. Intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) is short-course administration of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). This study is aimed at assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of ILIT in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods. MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Cochrane Library were used to conduct electronic searches for clinical trials comparing ILIT and placebo in patients with AR. The final search took place on August 24, 2022. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcomes included combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS), visual analog scale (VAS), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life (RQLQ), Skin-prick test (SPT), and adverse events (AEs). Data were synthesized as mean difference (MD)/standard mean difference (SMD) or risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results. Thirteen studies (454 participants) were included in this study. The ILIT group had better clinical improvement on the CSMS (random effects model, SMD-0.85, 95% CI [-1.58,-0.11], P = 0.02) and RQLQ (fixed-effects model, MD-0.42, 95% CI [0.69, 0.15], P = 0.003) than the placebo group. The booster injection was beneficial for CSMS (P < 0.0001), and the 4-week injection interval was superior to the 2-week injection period for improving VAS (P < 0.0001). Local swelling or erythema was the main AE following injection (random effects model, RD 0.16, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], P = 0.005). Discussion. For individuals with AR, ILIT is safe and effective. ILIT alleviates clinical symptoms and reduces pharmaceutical consumption without causing severe AEs. However, the validity of this study is compromised by the substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias in the included researches. Registration CRD42022355329.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Vitamin D Supplementation and Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kawada, Kei
    Sato, Chiemi
    Ishida, Tomoaki
    Nagao, Yui
    Yamamoto, Takaaki
    Jobu, Kohei
    Hamada, Yukihiro
    Ishizawa, Yuki Izawa
    Ishizawa, Keisuke
    Abe, Shinji
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (02):
  • [42] Effect of Medical Therapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Kathy
    Li, Andraia R.
    Miglani, Amar
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2022, 36 (02) : 269 - 280
  • [43] Effectiveness of Air Filters in Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shih, Ming-Yang
    Hsu, Hsueh-Wen
    Chen, Ssu-Yin
    Su, Ming-Jang
    Lo, Wei-Cheng
    Chen, Chiehfeng
    INDOOR AIR, 2024, 2024
  • [44] Vitamin D levels in allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Yoon Hee
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Kim, Min Jung
    Sol, In Suk
    Yoon, Seo Hee
    Ahn, Hyeong Sik
    Kim, Hyun Jung
    Sohn, Myung Hyun
    Kim, Kyu-Earn
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 27 (06) : 580 - 590
  • [45] Rhinophototherapy, an alternative treatment of allergic rhinitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ramos Costa, Tatyana Machado
    Carneiro, Fernanda Melo
    Soares de Oliveira, Karen Amanda
    Barbosa Souza, Maria Fernanda
    Gomes Avelino, Melissa Ameloti
    Wastowski, Isabela Jube
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 87 (06) : 742 - 752
  • [46] The Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Luo, Chao
    Peng, Shunlin
    Li, Mao
    Ao, Xudong
    Liu, Zhiqing
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [47] Acupuncture for allergic rhinitis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Chen, Yanni
    Song, Chenfei
    Wang, Jiaqin
    Han, Xinmin
    FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY, 2024, 5
  • [48] Intranasal antihistamines and corticosteroids in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    Vieira, Rafael Jose
    Brozek, Jan
    Cardoso-Fernandes, Antonio
    Lourenco-Silva, Nuno
    Ferreira-da-Silva, Renato
    Ferreira, Andre
    Gil-Mata, Sara
    Bedbrook, Anna
    Klimek, Ludger
    Fonseca, Joao A.
    Zuberbier, Torsten
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Bousquet, Jean
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 154 (02) : 340 - 354
  • [49] Montelukast in paediatric asthma and allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mayoral, Karina
    Lizano-Barrantes, Catalina
    Zamora, Victor
    Pont, Angels
    Miret, Carme
    Barrufet, Cristina
    Araceli Caballero-Rabasco, M.
    Praena-Crespo, Manuel
    Bercedo, Alberto
    Valdesoiro-Navarrete, Laura
    Teresa Guerra, Maria
    Pardo, Yolanda
    Martinez Zapata, Ma Jose
    Garin, Olatz
    Ferrer, Montse
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2023, 32 (170):
  • [50] Efficacy of Montelukast in Allergic Rhinitis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Madhusudhan Krishnamoorthy
    Norhayati Mohd Noor
    Norhafiza Mat Lazim
    Baharudin Abdullah
    Drugs, 2020, 80 : 1831 - 1851