Prognosis of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Mixed, Cardiogenic and Septic Shock

被引:6
|
作者
Kim, Ah-Ram [1 ]
Hyun, Junho [1 ]
Lee, Sang Eun [1 ]
Hong, Jung Ae [2 ]
Kang, Pil-Je [2 ]
Jung, Sung-Ho [2 ]
Kim, Min-Seok [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol,Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr Heart Inst, Heart Failure & Cardiac Transplantat Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43-gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
cardiogenic shock; septic shock; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; coronary care units; critical care; LACTATE CLEARANCE; RISK-FACTORS; SEPSIS; MORTALITY; ECMO;
D O I
10.1097/MAT.0000000000001933
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mixed cardiogenic-septic shock (MS), defined as the combination of cardiogenic (CS) and septic (SS) shock, is often encountered in cardiac intensive care units. Herein, the authors compared the impact of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in MS, CS, and SS. Of 1,023 patients who received VA-ECMO from January 2012 to February 2020 at a single center, 211 with pulmonary embolism, hypovolemic shock, aortic dissection, and unknown causes of shock were excluded. The remaining 812 patients were grouped based on the cause of shock at VA-ECMO application: i) MS (n = 246, 30.3%), ii) CS (n = 466, 57.4%), iii) SS (n = 100, 12.3%). The MS group was younger and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction than the CS or SS group did. The 30 day and 1 year mortalities were the highest in SS (30 day mortality: 50.4% vs. 43.3% vs. 69.0%, p < 0.001 for MS versus CS versus SS, respectively; 1 year mortality: 67.5% vs. 53.2% vs. 81.0%, p < 0.001 for MS versus CS versus SS, respectively). Posthoc analysis showed that the 30 day mortality of MS was not different from CS, while the 1 year mortality of MS was worse than CS but better than SS. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation application for MS may help improve survival and should therefore be considered if indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 664
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Ashleigh
    Phan, Kevin
    Tsai, Yi-Chin
    Yan, Tristan D.
    Forrest, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (03) : 637 - 645
  • [32] Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock post-cardiac arrest
    de Chambrun, Marc Pineton
    Brechot, Nicolas
    Lebreton, Guillaume
    Schmidt, Matthieu
    Hekimian, Guillaume
    Demondion, Pierre
    Trouillet, Jean-Louis
    Leprince, Pascal
    Chastre, Jean
    Combes, Alain
    Luyt, Charles-Edouard
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (12) : 1999 - 2007
  • [33] Percutaneous Decompression of the Left Ventricle in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Alkhouli, Mohamad
    Narins, Craig R.
    Lehoux, Juan
    Knight, Peter A.
    Waits, Bryan
    Ling, Frederick S.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2016, 31 (03) : 177 - 182
  • [34] Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for periprocedural Cardiogenic shock during interventional cardiology
    Verdugo, Fernando J.
    Cataldo, Pabla
    Sandoval, Jorge
    Pineda, Fernando
    Dauvergne, Christian
    Duarte, Manuel
    Bonta, Camila
    Iturra, Sebastian
    Olivares, Gabriel
    Concha, Marcelo
    Rossel, Victor
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2020, 148 (09) : 1295 - 1301
  • [35] Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves survival in myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock
    Tang, Gilbert H. L.
    Malekan, Ramin
    Kai, Masashi
    Lansman, Steven L.
    Spielvogel, David
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (03): : E32 - E33
  • [36] Prognostic echocardiographic findings in patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock
    Siriwardena, Maithri
    Brahmbhatt, Darshan H.
    Doufle, Ghislaine
    Fan, Eddy
    Billia, Filio
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2023, 12 (06) : 391 - 395
  • [37] Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction
    Bogerd, Margriet
    ten Berg, Sanne
    Peters, Elma J.
    Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
    Engstroem, Annemarie E.
    Otterspoor, Luuk C.
    Jung, Christian
    Westermann, Dirk
    Poess, Janine
    Thiele, Holger
    Schrage, Benedikt
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 (11) : 2021 - 2031
  • [38] Bridge to recovery by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in infarction-related cardiogenic shock
    Tschierschke, R.
    Bekeredjian, R.
    Katus, H. A.
    Raake, P.
    KARDIOLOGE, 2013, 7 (02): : 130 - 134
  • [39] A Case Of Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy For Cardiogenic Shock Secondary To A Phaeochromocytoma
    Griffin, S.
    Conrick-Martin, I
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (SUPPL 4) : 40 - 41
  • [40] Nosocomial Infections in Adult Cardiogenic Shock Patients Supported by Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
    Schmidt, Matthieu
    Brechot, Nicolas
    Hariri, Sarah
    Guiguet, Marguerite
    Luyt, Charles Edouard
    Makri, Ralouka
    Leprince, Pascal
    Trouillet, Jean-Louis
    Pavie, Alain
    Chastre, Jean
    Combes, Alain
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 55 (12) : 1633 - 1641