Fast-and-frugal heuristics for decision-making in uncertain and complex settings in construction

被引:9
|
作者
Love, Peter E. D. [1 ]
Ika, Lavagnon A. [2 ]
Pinto, Jeff K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Civil & Mech Engn, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[2] Univ Ottawa, Telfer Sch Management, 55 Laurier Ave East, Ottawa, ON KIN 6N5, Canada
[3] Black Sch Business, Erie, PA 16563 USA
来源
关键词
Bias; Decision-making; Ecological rationality; Heuristics; Risk; Uncertainty; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100129
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Fast-and-frugal heuristics are simple, task-specific decision strategies that form part of a decision maker's repertoire of cognitive strategies for solving judgment and decision tasks. They have been shown to deliver better decision outcomes than statistical (including probabilistic and stochastic) approaches in uncertain and complex settings or where there is only a small sample from which to draw conclusions. Yet, they have received limited attention in the construction-related literature. This paper aims to raise awareness of the important role that fast -and-frugal heuristics play in decision-making as alternatives to statistical models in uncertain and complex settings or where there is only a small sample from which to conclude. Additionally, it is suggested that there is a need for research to identify and develop an adaptive toolbox of ecologically rational heuristics to enhance decision-making within varying project settings in construction. This paper's contributions are twofold: (1) challenges the prevailing reliance on statistical approaches being used when making judgments under uncer-tainty; and (2) identifies a new line of inquiry to harness the benefits of using fast-and-frugal heuristics for decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Psychometric Properties of CollaboRATE: A Fast and Frugal Patient-Reported Measure of the Shared Decision-Making Process
    Barr, Paul James
    Thompson, Rachel
    Walsh, Thom
    Grande, Stuart W.
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (01)
  • [42] PARTICIPATIVE DECISION-MAKING IN CONSTRUCTION
    BORCHERDING, JD
    JOURNAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION DIVISION-ASCE, 1977, 103 (04): : 567 - 575
  • [43] DECISION-MAKING IN REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION
    ZOBLER, L
    ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 1958, 48 (02) : 140 - 148
  • [44] Transforming clinical practice guidelines and clinical pathways into fast-and-frugal decision trees to improve clinical care strategies
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    Hozo, Iztok
    Dale, William
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (05) : 1247 - 1254
  • [45] Medicine and heuristics: cognitive biases and medical decision-making
    Dale F. Whelehan
    Kevin C. Conlon
    Paul F. Ridgway
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2020, 189 : 1477 - 1484
  • [46] Formalizing heuristics in decision-making: a quantum probability perspective
    Pothos, Emmanuel M.
    Busemeyer, Jerome R.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2
  • [47] Heuristics as Decision-making Habits of Autonomous Sensorimotor Agents
    Batta, Erasmo
    Stephens, Christopher
    ALIFE 2019: THE 2019 CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2019, : 72 - 78
  • [48] On Human Decision-Making Heuristics and Algorithm Design in Engineering
    Leonard, Naomi Ehrich
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2014, 102 (04) : 572 - 573
  • [49] Consensus decision-making: performance of heuristics and mental models
    Tomlin, Damon
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 42 (04) : 316 - 330
  • [50] Decision-making heuristics and biases across the life span
    Strough, JoNell
    Karns, Tara E.
    Schlosnagle, Leo
    DECISION MAKING OVER THE LIFE SPAN, 2011, 1235 : 57 - 74