Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Hanada, Keisuke [1 ]
Sugimoto, Tomoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiga Univ, Grad Sch Data Sci, 1-1-1 Baba, Hikone, Shiga 5228522, Japan
关键词
Exact distribution; Meta-analysis; Random-effects model; Test statistic; HETEROGENEITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10463-022-00844-4
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Random-effects meta-analysis serves to integrate the results of multiple studies with methods such as moment estimation and likelihood estimation duly proposed. These existing methods are based on asymptotic normality with respect to the number of studies. However, the test and interval estimation deviate from the nominal significance level when integrating a small number of studies. Although a method for constructing more conservative intervals has been recently proposed, the exact distribution of test statistic for the overall treatment effect is not well known. In this paper, we provide an almost-exact distribution of the test statistic in random-effects meta-analysis and propose the test and interval estimation using the almost-exact distribution. Simulations demonstrate the accuracy of estimation and application to existing meta-analysis using the method proposed here. With known variance parameters, the estimation performance using the almost-exact distribution always achieves the nominal significance level regardless of the number of studies and heterogeneity. We also propose some methods to construct a conservative interval estimation, even when the variance parameters are unknown, and present their performances via simulation and an application to Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 302
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Valid inference in random effects meta-analysis
    Follmann, DA
    Proschan, MA
    BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (03) : 732 - 737
  • [32] Fixed-effect and random-effects models in meta-analysis
    Zhai Chunjuan
    Guyatt Gordon
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2024, 137 (01)
  • [33] Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: A comparative study
    Smith, TC
    Spiegelhalter, DJ
    Thomas, A
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (24) : 2685 - 2699
  • [34] Fixed-effect and random-effects models in meta-analysis
    Zhai, Chunjuan
    Guyatt, Gordon
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 137 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [35] Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update
    DerSimonian, Rebecca
    Kacker, Raghu
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 28 (02) : 105 - 114
  • [36] An alternative pseudolikelihood method for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis
    Chen, Yong
    Hong, Chuan
    Riley, Richard D.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (03) : 361 - 380
  • [37] Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal
    Rubio-Aparicio, Maria
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose Antonio
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Marin-Martinez, Fulgencio
    Viechtbauer, Wolfgang
    Van den Noortgate, Wim
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2018, 9 (03) : 489 - 503
  • [38] Median bias reduction in random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Kyriakou, Sophia
    Kosmidis, Ioannis
    Sartori, Nicola
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (06) : 1622 - 1636
  • [39] Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random-effects meta-analysis
    Chen, Ding-Geng
    Liu, Dungang
    Min, Xiaoyi
    Zhang, Heping
    BIOMETRICS, 2020, 76 (04) : 1319 - 1329
  • [40] Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis models for diagnostic test accuracy studies using arcsine-based transformations
    Negeri, Zelalem F.
    Shaikh, Mateen
    Beyene, Joseph
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 60 (04) : 827 - 844