Efficacy and safety analysis of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients

被引:4
|
作者
Lu, Yongkai [1 ]
Hui, Beina [1 ]
Yang, Di [2 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Li, Binglin [3 ]
Zhou, Luping [1 ]
Xu, Lei [1 ]
Tang, Fengwen [1 ]
Wang, Wei [4 ]
Chen, Ruijuan [3 ]
Zhao, Dongli [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, 277 Yanta West Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Shaanxi Prov Tumor Hosp, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol,Hlth Sci Ctr, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Xian Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Affiliated Hosp, Xian 710003, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Air Force Med Univ, Xijing Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Xian 710003, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; Hypofractionated radiotherapy; Conventional fractionated radiotherapy; Meta-analysis; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; BIG; 3-07/TROG; 07.01; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIATION-THERAPY; UK STANDARDIZATION; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; CONSERVING SURGERY; REPORTED OUTCOMES; ACUTE TOXICITY; SKIN TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-11918-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives In this meta-analysis, we conducted a comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in individuals who had undergone surgery for breast cancer. Methods This study involved a systematic and independent review of relevant research articles published in reputable databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Two investigators conducted the review, which included studies published up to January 3, 2023. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated and data were extracted using Review Manager software 5.4 (RevMan 5.4) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The analysis comprised 35 studies and encompassed a collective sample of 18,246 individuals diagnosed with breast cancer. We did not find a statistically significant disparity in efficacy between conventional fractionated (CF) radiotherapy and hypofractionated (HF) radiotherapy regarding local recurrence (LR; OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76-1.09, P = 0.30), disease-free survival (DFS; OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.42, P = 0.03), and overall survival (OS; OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93-1.26, P = 0.28). Concerning safety, there was no significant difference between the HF and CF regimens in terms of breast pain, breast atrophy, lymphedema, pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, telangiectasia, and cardiotoxicity. However, the HF regimen resulted in lower skin toxicity (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.55, P < 0.01) and improved patient fatigue outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60 - 0.88, P < 0.01). Conclusions Although there is no substantial difference in LR, DFS, OS, or many other side effects between the HF and CF regimens, the HF regimen reduces skin toxicity and relieves patient fatigue. If these two issues need to be addressed in clinical situations, the HF regimen may be a superior alternative to conventional radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety analysis of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postoperative breast cancer patients
    Yongkai Lu
    Beina Hui
    Di Yang
    Yi Li
    Binglin Li
    Luping Zhou
    Lei Xu
    Fengwen Tang
    Wei Wang
    Ruijuan Chen
    Dongli Zhao
    BMC Cancer, 24
  • [2] Hypofractionated versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with reconstructed breast: Toxicity analysis
    Kim, Dong-Yun
    Park, Eonju
    Heo, Chan Yeong
    Jin, Ung Sik
    Kim, Eun Kyu
    Han, Wonshik
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, In Ah
    BREAST, 2021, 55 : 37 - 44
  • [3] Hypofractionated Versus Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy for Reconstructed Breast Cancer: Toxicity Analysis
    Kim, D. Y.
    Park, E.
    Heo, C. Y.
    Kim, E. K.
    Kim, I. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E21 - E21
  • [4] Comparing hypofractionated to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Liu, Lei
    Yang, Yongqiang
    Guo, Qi
    Ren, Bixin
    Peng, Qiliang
    Zou, Li
    Zhu, Yaqun
    Tian, Ye
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [5] Comparing hypofractionated to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lei Liu
    Yongqiang Yang
    Qi Guo
    Bixin Ren
    Qiliang Peng
    Li Zou
    Yaqun Zhu
    Ye Tian
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [6] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF HYPOFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY IN ADJUVANT TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER
    Nagura, K.
    Koyama, T.
    Gomi, D.
    Mikawa, T.
    Matsuda, M.
    Oyama, Y.
    Fukuma, E.
    Shoji, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 127 - 127
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Viani, Gustavo A.
    Gouveia, Andre G.
    Arcidiacono, Fabio
    Marta, Gustavo N.
    Hamamura, Ana Carolina
    Anselmo, Paola
    Barbosa, Felipe S.
    Moraes, Fabio Y.
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2024, 29 (03) : 309 - 317
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of hypofractionated loco-regional radiotherapy for breast cancer patients.
    Caubet, M.
    Bontemps, P.
    Anota, A.
    Boulbair, F.
    Hammoud, Y.
    Peigneaux, K.
    Crehange, G.
    De Bari, B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S730 - S731
  • [9] Comparative analysis of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiotherapy on acute skin toxicity in a multiracial/ethnic breast cancer population
    Zhang, Veronica Y.
    Takita, Cristiane
    Wright, Jean L.
    Zhao, Wei
    Reis, Isildinha M.
    Lee, Eunkyung
    Hu, Jennifer J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [10] Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme
    El-Shenshawy, H. M.
    El-Razek, A. Abd
    Bader, H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)