Interpretable high-stakes decision support system for credit default forecasting

被引:4
|
作者
Sun, Weixin [1 ]
Zhang, Xuantao [2 ]
Li, Minghao [1 ]
Wang, Yong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
[2] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Municipal Res Inst Publ Hlth, Dalian 116037, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
High-stakes decision forecasting; Credit default forecasting; Interpretable machine learning; Imbalanced datasets; Resampling methods; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122825
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Methods for forecasting credit default have long been research focus for financial institutions. In this study, we propose an interpretable high-stakes decision support system for credit default forecasting called CDFS. Because of the high-stake nature of credit default prediction, the proposed CDFS adheres to the principle of "people in the loop." The proposed CDFS comprises six modules: data processing, feature selection, data balancing, forecasting, evaluation, and interpretation. A feature selection method (permutation importance method), nine resampling methods, and six high-performance forecasting methods were employed in the proposed CDFS. The China Taiwan credit card default dataset and South Germany credit dataset were used to test the interpretability and predictive performance of the proposed CDFS. Experiments showed that the feature selection and data balancing modules of the CDFS effectively improve the prediction performance. A comparison with traditional logistic regression models demonstrated that the CDFS can provide decision-makers with satisfactory explanations for prediction results. In summary, the CDFS proposed in this study exhibited excellent predictive performance and satisfactory interpretability. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of credit default forecasting and reducing credit risk in financial institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of a decision support system for credit management decisions
    Kanungo, S
    Sharma, S
    Jain, PK
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2001, 30 (04) : 419 - 436
  • [42] Measuring Variability in Proctor Decision Making on High-Stakes Assessments: Improving Test Security in the Digital Age
    Belzak, William
    Lockwood, Jr.
    Attali, Yigal
    EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2024, 43 (01) : 52 - 65
  • [43] Decision Heuristics and Descriptive Choice Models for Sequential High-Stakes Risky Choices in the Deal or No Deal Game
    Chen, Zhiqin
    John, Richard S.
    DECISION-WASHINGTON, 2021, 8 (03): : 155 - 179
  • [44] Competence by Design: The Role of High-Stakes Examinations in a Competence Based Medical Education System
    Bhanji, Farhan
    Naik, Viren
    Skoll, Amanda
    Pittini, Richard
    Daniels, Vijay John
    Bacchus, C. Maria
    Bandiera, Glen
    PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 13 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [45] Research on the online credit assessment decision support system
    Jiang, Guoyin
    Sixth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Vols 1-4: MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN A GLOBAL WORLD, 2007, : 347 - 352
  • [46] Machine learning and decision support system on credit scoring
    Gernmanno Teles
    Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues
    Kashif Saleem
    Sergei Kozlov
    Ricardo A. L. Rabêlo
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32 : 9809 - 9826
  • [47] Lessons Learned in Applying Decision Analysis to Natural Resource Management for High-Stakes Issues Surrounded by Uncertainty
    Robinson, Kelly F.
    Dufour, Mark R.
    Fischer, Jason L.
    Herbst, Seth J.
    Jones, Michael L.
    Nathan, Lucas R.
    Newcomb, Tammy J.
    DECISION ANALYSIS, 2023, 20 (04) : 326 - 342
  • [48] Educators as Judges: Applying Judicial Decision-Making Principles to High-Stakes Education Assessment Decisions
    Hu, Wendy C. Y.
    Dillon, Hugh C. B.
    Wilkinson, Tim J.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2023, 35 (02) : 168 - 179
  • [49] Elevating humanism in high-stakes automation: experts-in-the-loop and resort-to-force decision making
    Davis, Jenny L.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2024, 78 (02) : 200 - 209
  • [50] Growing the Good Stuff: One Literacy Coach's Approach to Support Teachers With High-Stakes Testing
    Zoch, Melody
    JOURNAL OF LITERACY RESEARCH, 2016, 47 (03) : 328 - 369