Life Cycle Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis as Combined Economic-Environmental Assessment Tools: Application to an Anaerobic Digestion Plant

被引:7
|
作者
Bruno, Morena [1 ]
Marchi, Michela [1 ]
Ermini, Nicolo [2 ]
Niccolucci, Valentina [1 ]
Pulselli, Federico Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, Dept Phys Sci Earth & Environm, Ecodynam Grp, Piazzetta Enzo Tiezzi 1, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Univ Siena, Dept Econ & Stat, Piazza San Francesco 7-8, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
carbon footprint; cost benefit analysis; economic-environmental assessment; anaerobic digestion; biogas; environmental externality; ELECTRICITY; EMISSIONS; GENERATION; FRAMEWORK; WASTE; POWER;
D O I
10.3390/en16093686
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In the present study, using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), we assess the economic-environmental performance of an anaerobic digestion (AD) plant, fed by cultured crops (i.e., maize and wheat), in Italy. The biogas generated by the AD plant is used for the production of electricity, imputed into the Italian energy grid. The LCA evaluated potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, measured via Carbon Footprint (CF), while the CBA analysed the financial and economic profiles via the Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) indicators. The strength of combining these methodologies is the joint examination of the financial and social-environmental performance of the plant. The results of the CBA are complemented with the GHG emissions avoided by producing electricity from biogas. The CF of 0.28 kg CO(2)eq.kWh(-1) of electricity produced is mainly due to the nitrogen fertilizers involved in the production of the additional feedstock matrix (i.e., maize flour). In the CBA, the negative financial NPV and the financial IRR, which is lower than the discount rate applied, highlight the inability of the net revenue to repay the initial investment. Regarding the social desirability, the economic analysis, enriched by the LCA outcomes, shows a positive economic performance, demonstrating that the combination of information from different methodologies enables wider consideration for the anaerobic digestion plant. In line with the Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan's aim to strongly increase the exploitation of renewable resources, an AD plant fed by dedicated crops could valorise the marginal uncultivated land, obtaining energy without consuming land for food production. Moreover, this AD plant could contribute to the creation of repeatable small-scale energy production systems able to sustain the demand of local communities.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of high solids anaerobic co-digestion for biosolids and organic waste management
    Lee, Eunyoung
    Oliveira, Deborah Stolte Bezerra Lisboa
    Oliveira, Luiza Stolte Bezerra Lisboa
    Jimenez, Eduardo
    Kim, Youngwoon
    Wang, Meng
    Ergas, Sarina J.
    Zhang, Qiong
    WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 171 (171)
  • [42] A cost-benefit assessment of black liquor gasifier combined cycle technology integrated into a kraft pulp mill
    Larson, ED
    McDonald, GW
    Yang, WR
    Frederick, WJ
    Iisa, K
    Kreutz, TG
    Malcolm, EW
    Brown, CA
    INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL RECOVERY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 1 - 18
  • [43] On the limitations of life cycle assessment and environmental systems analysis tools in general
    Finnveden G.
    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2000, 5 (04): : 229 - 238
  • [44] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Monoclonal Antibody Cultivation Scenarios in Terms of Life Cycle Environmental Impact and Operating Cost
    Amasawa, Eri
    Kuroda, Hiroaki
    Okamura, Kozue
    Badr, Sara
    Sugiyama, Hirokazu
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (42): : 14012 - 14021
  • [45] Comparative assessment of environmental life-cycle-based tools: an application to particleboard
    Garcia, Rita
    Freire, Fausto
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2011,
  • [46] Agent-Based Life Cycle Assessment enables joint economic-environmental analysis of policy to support agricultural biomass for biofuels
    Lopez i Losada, Rahul
    Rosenbaum, Ralph K.
    Brady, Mark, V
    Wilhelmsson, Fredrik
    Hedlund, Katarina
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 916
  • [47] Design and cost-benefit analysis of a novel anaerobic industrial bioenergy plant in Pakistan
    Rasheed, Rizwan
    Khan, Naghman
    Yasar, Abdullah
    Su, Yuehong
    Tabinda, Amtul Bari
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 90 : 242 - 247
  • [48] Risk assessment and cost-benefit techniques as management tools for oil spill prevention
    Diller, S
    OIL AND HYDROCARBON SPILLS, MODELLING, ANALYSIS AND CONTROL, 1998, : 253 - 263
  • [49] Technical assessment combined with an extended cost-benefit analysis for the restoration of groundwater and forest ecosystem services - an application for Grand Bahama
    Imig, Anne
    Perosa, Francesca
    Hotta, Carolina Iwane
    Klausner, Sophia
    Welsh, Kristen
    Zheng, Yan
    Rein, Arno
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2024, 28 (24) : 5459 - 5478
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of sludge anaerobic digestion combined with land application treatment route: Greenhouse gas emission and reduction potential
    Yang, Hang
    Guo, Yali
    Fang, Ning
    Dong, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (06):