Preoperative colonic stents vs emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: meta-analysis with systematic review of the literature

被引:0
|
作者
Belinda De Simone [1 ]
Fausto Catena [1 ]
Federico Coccolini [2 ]
Salomone Di Saverio [3 ]
Massimo Sartelli [4 ]
Arianna Heyer [5 ]
Nicola De Angelis [6 ]
Gian Luigi De Angelis [7 ]
Luca Ansaloni [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery,University Hospital of Parma
[2] Department of General and Emergency Surgery,Papa XXIII Hospital  3. Department of General Surgery,Maggiore Hospital of Bologna  4. Department of
关键词
Colonic stent; Self-expandable metallic stent; Obstructive left colon cancer; Emergency surgery; Endo-laparoscopic approach; Oncological outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.3 [肠肿瘤];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM To investigate by meta-analytic study and systematic review, advantages of colonic stent placement in comparison with emergency surgery.METHODS We conducted an extensive literature search by PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and the Cochrane Libraries. We searched for all the papers in English published till February 2016, by applying combinations of the following terms: Obstructive colon cancer, colon cancer in emergency, colorectal stenting, emergency surgery for colorectal cancer, guidelines for obstructive colorectal cancer, stenting vs emergency surgery in the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer, selfexpanding metallic stents, stenting as bridge to surgery. The study was designed following the PrismaStatement. By our search, we identified 452 studies, and 57 potentially relevant studies in full-text were reviewed by 2 investigators; ultimately, 9 randomized controlled trials were considered for meta-analysis and all the others were considered for systematic review.RESULTS In the meta-analysis, by comparing colonic stenting(CS) as bridge to surgery and emergency surgery, the pooled analysis showed no significant difference between the two techniques in terms of mortality [odds ratio(oR) = 0.91], morbidity(oR = 2.38) or permanent stoma rate(oR = 1.67); primary anastomosis was more frequent in the stent group(oR = 0.45; P = 0.004) and stoma creation was more frequent in the emergency surgery group(oR = 2.36; P = 0.002). No statistical difference was found in disease-free survival and overall survival. The pooled analysis showed a significant difference between the colonic stent and emergency surgery groups(oR = 0.37), with a significantly higher 1-year recurrence rate in the stent group(P = 0.007).CONCLUSION CS improves primary anastomosis rate with significantly high 1-year follow-up recurrence and no statistical difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decompressing Stoma vs. Emergency Resection for malignant left-sided Colonic Obstruction
    Strassmueller, A.
    Anthuber, M.
    CHIRURG, 2021, 92 (02): : 168 - 168
  • [22] Acute resection versus bridge to surgery with diverting colostomy for patients with acute malignant left sided colonic obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amelung, Femke J.
    Mulder, Charlotte L. J.
    Verheijen, Paul M.
    Draaisma, Werner A.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2015, 24 (04): : 313 - 321
  • [23] Management of malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction: a comparison between colonic stents and surgery
    White, Stephen I.
    Abdool, S. Ibrahim
    Frenkiel, Brett
    Braun, William V.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 81 (04) : 257 - 260
  • [24] Colonic stent versus emergency surgery as treatment of malignant colonic obstruction in the palliative setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ribeiro, Igor Braga
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    Martins, Bruno da Costa
    Hourneaux de Moura, Diogo Turiani
    Baba, Elisa Ryoka
    Josino, Iatagan Rocha
    Miyajima, Nelson Tomio
    Coronel Cordero, Martin Andres
    de Carvalho Visconti, Thiago Arantes
    Ide, Edson
    Sakai, Paulo
    Hourneaux de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (05) : E558 - E567
  • [25] Placement of the Decompression Tube as a Bridge to Surgery for Acute Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction
    Yuan-Shun Xu
    Tao Song
    Yong-Tuan Guo
    Guo-Qing Shao
    Hong-Tao Du
    De-Chun Li
    Yu-Fei Fu
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19 : 2243 - 2248
  • [26] Placement of the Decompression Tube as a Bridge to Surgery for Acute Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction
    Xu, Yuan-Shun
    Song, Tao
    Guo, Yong-Tuan
    Shao, Guo-Qing
    Du, Hong-Tao
    Li, De-Chun
    Fu, Yu-Fei
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (12) : 2243 - 2248
  • [27] Acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: Is there a role for endoscopic stenting?
    Russo, Salvatore
    Conigliaro, Rita
    Coppini, Francesca
    Dell'Aquila, Emanuela
    Grande, Giuseppe
    Pigo, Flavia
    Mangiafico, Santi
    Lupo, Marinella
    Marocchi, Margherita
    Bertani, Helga
    Cocca, Silvia
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (05): : 190 - 197
  • [28] Surgical options for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction
    Villar, JM
    Martinez, AP
    Villegas, MT
    Muffak, K
    Mansilla, A
    Garrote, D
    Ferron, JA
    SURGERY TODAY, 2005, 35 (04) : 275 - 281
  • [29] Surgical Options for Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction
    Jesus M. Villar
    Ana P. Martinez
    Maria T. Villegas
    Karim Muffak
    Alfonso Mansilla
    Daniel Garrote
    Jose A. Ferron
    Surgery Today, 2005, 35 : 275 - 281
  • [30] Diversion, resection, or stenting as a bridge to surgery for acute neoplastic left-sided colonic obstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies with curative intent
    Gavriilidis, P.
    De'Angelis, N.
    Wheeler, J.
    Askari, A.
    Di Saverio, S.
    Davies, J. R.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2021, 103 (04) : 235 - 244