Prediction of Coke Yield of FCC Unit Using Different Artificial Neural Network Models

被引:0
|
作者
Su Xin [1 ]
Wu Yingya [1 ]
Pei Huajian [1 ]
Gao Jinsen [1 ]
Lan Xingying [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum
关键词
FCC; coke yield; GRNN neural network; BP neural network;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE96 [油气加工厂机械设备];
学科分类号
080706 ;
摘要
In fluid catalytic cracking(FCC) unit, it is greatly important to control the coke yield, since the increase of coke yield not only leads to the reduction of total liquid yield, but also affects the heat balance and operation of FCC unit. Consequently, it is significant to predict the coke yield accurately. The coke formation and burning reactions are affected by many parameters which influence each other, so it is difficult to establish a prediction model using traditional models. This paper combines the industrial production data and establishes a generalized regression neural network(GRNN) model and a back propagation(BP) neural network model to predict the coke yield respectively. The comparison and analysis results show that the accuracy and stability of the BP neural network prediction results are better than that of the GRNN. Then, the particle swarm optimization to optimize BP neural network(PSO-BP) and genetic algorithm to optimize the BP neural network(GA-BP) were further used to improve the prediction precision. The comparison of these models shows that they can improve the prediction precision. However, considering the accuracy and stability of the prediction results, the GA-BP model is better than PSO-BP model.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Yield Prediction Using Artificial Neural Networks
    Baral, Seshadri
    Tripathy, Asis Kumar
    Bijayasingh, Pritiranjan
    COMPUTER NETWORKS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 142 : 315 - +
  • [22] Yield and Quality Prediction of Winter Rapeseed-Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Models
    Rajkovic, Dragana
    Marjanovic Jeromela, Ana
    Pezo, Lato
    Loncar, Biljana
    Zanetti, Federica
    Monti, Andrea
    Kondic Spika, Ankica
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [23] Generalization of peanut yield prediction models using artificial neural networks and vegetation indices
    Souza, Jarlyson Brunno Costa
    de Almeida, Samira Luns Hatum
    de Oliveira, Mailson Freire
    Carreira, Vinicius dos Santos
    de Filho, Armando Lopes Brito
    dos Santos, Adao Felipe
    da Silva, Rouverson Pereira
    SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 11
  • [24] Comparison of two different artificial neural network models for prediction of soil penetration resistance
    Unal, Ilker
    Kabas, Onder
    Sozer, Salih
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 55 (01)
  • [25] Wheat Yield Prediction: Artificial Neural Network based Approach
    Kadir, Muhd Khairulzaman Abdul
    Ayob, Mohd Zaki
    Miniappan, Nadaraj
    2014 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNOPRENEURSHIP (ICE2T), 2014, : 161 - 165
  • [26] Maize Yield Prediction using Artificial Neural Networks based on a Trial Network Dataset
    de Souza, Paulo Vitor Duarte
    de Rezende, Leiliane Pereira
    Duarte, Aildson Pereira
    Miranda, Glauco Vieira
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (02) : 10338 - 10346
  • [27] Artificial neural network models for airport capacity prediction
    Choi, Sun
    Kim, Young Jin
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 97
  • [28] ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK MODELS FOR BUILDING ENERGY PREDICTION
    Ahn, Ki Uhn
    Park, Cheol Soo
    2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 2708 - 2716
  • [29] Prediction of permeability coefficient of soil using hybrid artificial neural network models
    Kharnoob, Majid M.
    Vora, Tarak
    Dasarathy, A. K.
    Kapila, Ish
    Kheimi, Marwan
    Rapeti, Srinivasa Rao
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [30] Graft survival prediction in liver transplantation using artificial neural network models
    Raji, C. G.
    Chandra, Vinod S. S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2016, 16 : 72 - 78