基于土壤侵蚀控制度的黄土高原水土流失治理潜力研究(英文)

被引:21
|
作者
高海东 [1 ,2 ]
李占斌 [1 ,2 ]
贾莲莲 [3 ]
李鹏 [1 ]
徐国策 [1 ]
任宗萍 [1 ]
庞国伟 [4 ]
赵宾华 [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area (Xi’an University of Technology)
[2] State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Agriculture on Loess Plateau,Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources
[3] Upper and Middle Yellow River Bureau,Yellow River Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources
[4] College of Urban and Environmental Science,Northwest
关键词
Loess Plateau; soil erosion control degree; control potential of soil erosion and water loss; RUSLE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S157 [水土保持];
学科分类号
0815 ; 082802 ; 090707 ; 0910 ;
摘要
The capacity of soil and water conservation measures, defined as the maximum quantity of suitable soil and water conservation measures contained in a region, were determined for the Loess Plateau based on zones suitable for establishing terraced fields, forestland and grassland with the support of geographic information system(GIS) software. The minimum possible soil erosion modulus and actual soil erosion modulus in 2010 were calculated using the revised universal soil loss equation(RUSLE), and the ratio of the minimum possible soil erosion modulus under the capacity of soil and water conservation measures to the actual soil erosion modulus was defined as the soil erosion control degree. The control potential of soil erosion and water loss in the Loess Plateau was studied using this concept. Results showed that the actual soil erosion modulus was 3355 t·km–2·a–1, the minimum possible soil erosion modulus was 1921 t·km–2·a–1, and the soil erosion control degree was 0.57(medium level) in the Loess Plateau in 2010. In terms of zoning, the control degree was relatively high in the river valley-plain area, soil-rocky mountainous area, and windy-sandy area, but relatively low in the soil-rocky hilly-forested area, hilly-gully area and plateau-gully area. The rate of erosion areas with a soil erosion modulus of less than 1000 t·km–2·a–1 increased from 50.48% to 57.71%, forest and grass coverage rose from 56.74% to 69.15%, rate of terraced fields increased from 4.36% to 19.03%, and per capita grain available rose from 418 kg·a–1 to 459 kg·a–1 under the capacity of soil and water conservation measures compared with actual conditions. These research results are of some guiding significance for soil and water loss control in the Loess Plateau.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 472
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] China County Statistical Yearbook 2012. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’’s Republic of China. China Statistics Press . 2012
  • [22] 基于下游河流健康的黄土高原土壤容许流失量
    张世杰
    焦菊英
    [J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, (01) : 9 - 15+23
  • [23] 中国气候区划新方案
    郑景云
    尹云鹤
    李炳元
    [J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [24] 黄河中游地区年径流对土地利用变化时空响应分析
    张晓萍
    张橹
    王勇
    穆兴民
    [J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2009, (01) : 19 - 26
  • [25] 黄河中游水土保持措施的减水减沙作用研究
    冉大川
    [J]. 资源科学, 2006, (01) : 93 - 100
  • [26] 容许土壤流失量的研究现状及其设想
    李兰
    周忠浩
    刘刚才
    [J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, (10) : 1127 - 1134
  • [27] 黄土高原水平梯田的蓄水保土效益分析
    吴发启
    张玉斌
    王健
    [J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2004, (01) : 34 - 37
  • [28] 水土保持措施对流域泥沙输移比的影响
    许炯心
    孙季
    [J]. 水科学进展, 2004, (01) : 29 - 34
  • [29] 不同植被类型对土壤水蚀的影响(英文)
    张岩
    刘宝元
    张清春
    谢云
    [J]. ActaBotanicaSinica, 2003, (10) : 1204 - 1209
  • [30] 黄土高原土壤侵蚀作物覆盖因子计算
    张岩
    刘宝元
    史培军
    江忠善
    [J]. 生态学报, 2001, (07) : 1050 - 1056