合同自由与分配正义

被引：67

作者：

许德风

机构：

[1] 北京大学法学院

来源：

中外法学 | 2020年 / 32卷 / 04期

关键词：

分配正义; 程序正义; 合同自由; 欺诈; 胁迫;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D913 [民法];

学科分类号：

030105 ;

摘要：

欺诈、胁迫、错误等有关缔约过程的制度及情事变更、违约金调整等有关缔约结果的制度一方面是合同自由制度的重要组成部分,另一方面也是民商法关照分配正义的主要支点。社会福利取决于个体福祉,其中分配的公平是一个前提性条件和内生性要求。基于保护基本权利、维护团体发展、实现个体价值和促进法的合法性等理由,同时鉴于公法和私法之间的密切关联及二者在分配效率上各自的优势,不仅在合同法中,在整个民商法体系中也都要顾及分配正义的理念。

引用

页码：973 / 1000

页数：28

共 59 条

[21]

Are We One Self or Multiple Selves?: Implications for Law and Public Policy[J] . Richard A. Posner.Legal Theory . 1997 (1)

[22]

Passing on the Costs of Legal Rules: Efficiency and Distribution in Buyer-Seller Relationships[J] . Stanford Law Review . 1991 (2)

[23] THE STRUCTURE OF CORPORATION LAW [J].

EISENBERG, MA .

COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1989, 89 (07) :1461-1525

[24]

Coase Defends Coase: Why Lawyers Listen and Economists Do Not[J] . Michigan Law Review . 1989 (6)

[25] MARKET-INALIENABILITY [J].

RADIN, MJ .

HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1987, 100 (08) :1849-1937

[26]

Contract and Fair Exchange[J] . The University of Toronto Law Journal . 1985 (1)

[27] EQUALITY IN EXCHANGE [J].

GORDLEY, J .

CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1981, 69 (06) :1587-1656

[28]

A Note of Efficiency vs. Distributional Equity in Legal Rulemaking: Should Distributional Equity Matter Given Optimal Income Taxation?[J] . Steven Shavell.The American Economic Review . 1981 (2)

[29]

Freedom of Contract as Ideology[J] . Stanford Law Review . 1981 (4)

[30]

Resolving Nuisance Disputes: The Simple Economics of Injunctive and Damage Remedies[J] . Stanford Law Review . 1980 (6)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →