New fecal test for non-invasive Helicobacter pylori detection: A diagnostic accuracy study

被引:4
|
作者
Andrea Iannone [1 ,2 ]
Floriana Giorgio [3 ]
Francesco Russo [4 ]
Giuseppe Riezzo [4 ]
Bruna Girardi [3 ]
Maria Pricci [3 ]
Suetonia C Palmer [5 ]
Michele Barone [1 ]
Mariabeatrice Principi [1 ]
Giovanni FM Strippoli [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Alfredo Di Leo [1 ]
Enzo Ierardi [1 ]
机构
[1] Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari
[2] Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari
[3] THD SpA  4. National Institute of Gastroenterology, “S De Bellis” Research Hospital  5. Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch
[4] Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney
[5] Section of Nephrology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari
关键词
Helicobacter pylori; Fecal test; Feces; Stools; 23S rRNA; Molecular analysis; Antibiotic resistance; Diagnostic accuracy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R446.13 [粪便检验]; R573 [胃疾病];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ; 100208 ;
摘要
AIM To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a new fecal test for detecting Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori), using13Curea breath test as the reference standard, and explore bacterial antibiotic resistance. METHODS We conducted a prospective two-center diagnostic test accuracy study. We enrolled consecutive people≥ 18 years without previous diagnosis of H. pylori infection, referred for dyspepsia between February and October 2017. At enrollment, all participants underwent 13 C-urea breath test. Participants aged over 50 years were scheduled to undergo upper endoscopy with histology. Participants collected stool samples 1-3 d after enrollment for a new fecal investigation(THD fecal test). The detection of bacterial 23 S rRNA subunit gene indicated H. pylori infection. We also used the index diagnostic test to examine mutations conferring resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Independent investigators analyzed index test and reference test standard results blinded to the other test findings. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive(PPV) and negative(NPV) predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratio(LR), together with 95% confidence intervals(CI).RESULTS We enrolled 294 consecutive participants(age: Median 37.0 years, IQR: 29.0-46.0 years; men: 39.8%). Ninetyfive(32.3%) participants had a positive13C-urea breath test. Twenty-three(7.8%) participants underwent upper endoscopy with histology, with a full concordance between13C-urea breath test and histology in detecting H. pylori infection. Four(1.4%) out of the 294 participants withdrew from the study after the enrollment visit and did not undergo THD fecal testing. In the 290 participants who completed the study, the THD fecal test sensitivity was 90.2%(CI: 84.2%-96.3%), specificity 98.5%(CI:96.8%-100%), PPV 96.5%(CI: 92.6%-100%), NPV 95.6%(CI: 92.8%-98.4%), accuracy 95.9%(CI: 93.6%-98.2%), positive LR 59.5(CI: 19.3-183.4), negative LR 0.10(CI: 0.05-0.18). Out of 83 infected participants identified with the THD fecal test, 34(41.0%) had bacterial genotypic changes consistent with antibiotic-resistant H. pylori infection. Of these, 27(32.5%) had bacterial strains resistant to clarithromycin, 3(3.6%) to levofloxacin, and 4(4.8%) to both antibiotics. CONCLUSION The THD fecal test has high performance for the non-invasive diagnosis of H. pylori infection while additionally enabling the assessment of bacterial antibiotic resistances.
引用
收藏
页码:3021 / 3029
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic accuracy of PCR in the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Feliciangeli, G
    Macarri, G
    Di Sario, A
    Brugia, M
    Pauri, P
    Benedetti, A
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (04) : A160 - A161
  • [42] Non-invasive techniques for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Gatta, L
    Ricci, C
    Tampieri, A
    Vaira, D
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2003, 9 (06) : 489 - 496
  • [43] Diagnostic accuracy of reused Pronto Dry® test and CLOtest® in the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Jamaludin, Shahidi
    Mustaffa, Nazri
    Hamzah, Nor Aizal Che
    Aziz, Syed Hassan Syed Abdul
    Lee, Yeong Yeh
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [44] Diagnostic accuracy of reused Pronto Dry® test and CLOtest® in the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection
    Shahidi Jamaludin
    Nazri Mustaffa
    Nor Aizal Che Hamzah
    Syed Hassan Syed Abdul Aziz
    Yeong Yeh Lee
    BMC Gastroenterology, 15
  • [45] Detection of Helicobacter Pylori infection by invasive and non-invasive techniques in patients with gastrointestinal diseases from Iraq: A validation study
    Hussein, Rawaa A.
    Al-Ouqaili, Mushtak T. S.
    Majeed, Yasin H.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [46] Review article:: invasive and non-invasive tests for Helicobacter pylori infection
    Vaira, D
    Holton, J
    Menegatti, M
    Ricci, C
    Gatta, L
    Geminiani, A
    Miglioli, M
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 14 : 13 - 22
  • [47] Validation of a non-invasive method for the early detection of metabolic syndrome: a diagnostic accuracy test in a working population
    Romero-Saldana, Manuel
    Tauler, Pedro
    Vaquero-Abellan, Manuel
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Angel-Arturo
    Fuentes-Jimenez, Francisco-Jose
    Aguilo, Antoni
    Alvarez-Fernandez, Carlos
    Molina-Recio, Guillermo
    Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [48] A new non-invasive test for the detection of compartment syndromes
    Edwards, PD
    Miles, KA
    Owens, SJ
    Kemp, PM
    Jenner, JR
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 20 (03) : 215 - 218
  • [49] Invasive and non-invasive Helicobacter pylori diagnostic methods in Iran (vol 20C, 100749, 2020)
    Syam, Ari Fahrial
    GENE REPORTS, 2021, 24
  • [50] Non-invasive detection and successful treatment of a Helicobacter pylori infection in a captive rhesus macaque
    Semrau, Antje
    Gerold, Susanne
    Frick, Julia-Stefanie
    Iglauer, Franz
    LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2017, 51 (02) : 208 - 211