Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Eradication of Deep Endometriosis Using the da Vinci SP

被引:0
|
作者
Kanno, Kiyoshi [1 ]
Kurose, Yoshiko [1 ]
Yanai, Shiori [1 ]
Andou, Masaaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kurashiki Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Articulating instruments; Complete cul-de-sac obliteration; Nerve-plane; Radical hysterectomy; Single-port; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The evolution of nerve-sparing surgery has been supported by a growing body of literature on anatomic details, dissection techniques, and functional outcomes, suggesting that nerve-sparing surgery for deep endometriosis (DE) reduces postoperative pelvic organ dysfunction, including voiding and rectal dysfunction [1]. Recently, newer single-port robotic systems (da Vinci SP) have become available with articulating instruments and cameras that allow for intracorporeal triangulation, which may overcome some of the weaknesses of conventional single-port laparoscopic surgery [2]. Although such systems are believed to allow more complex surgeries than conventional single-port laparoscopic surgery, the scope of application remains unexplored. The objective of this video is therefore to demonstrate the anatomical and technical highlights of a complex intrapelvic procedure, nerve-sparing modified radical hysterectomy and complete removal of DE using the da Vinci SP (SP). Setting: An urban general hospital. Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. Participants: The patient was a 47-year-old woman who presented with chronic pelvic pain resistant to pharmacotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging showed uterine adenomyosis and bilateral ovarian endometrioma with DE, involving the uterosacral ligament and surface of the rectum, with complete cul-de-sac obliteration. Interventions: The surgical steps were completely identical to conventional multiport laparoscopic robotic surgery [3,4]. This suggests that conventional laparoscopic or robotic skills are highly transferrable to SP. SP offer several advantages, including high-resolution three-dimensional visualization, articulating instruments, and improved dexterity and range of motion. These advantages allow us to comfortably perform meticulous dissection and suturing even in difficult situations such as DE. The postoperative course was uneventful, with no perioperative complications, including no postoperative bladder or rectal dysfunction [5]. She was very satisfied with the invisible operative scar and low degree of postoperative pain. Conclusion: Nerve-sparing eradication of DE using SP is technically safe and feasible, with cosmetic advantages and less pain. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2025) 32, 217-218. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AAGL.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 218
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Excision of a Symptomatic Obturator Nerve Schwannoma: A Case Report
    Liakos, Nikolaos
    Mendrek, Mikolaj A.
    Witt, Joern H.
    Wagner, Christian
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [22] Case presentation of a robot-assisted bilateral benign tonsillectomy using the da Vinci SP system
    Seifen, Christopher
    Matthias, Christoph
    Jeyarajan, Harishanker
    Huppertz, Tilman
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2025, 2025 (01):
  • [23] Techniques of Nerve-Sparing and Potency Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2010, 36 (03): : 259 - 271
  • [24] Nerve-sparing Robot-assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: The Monoblock Technique
    Afferi, Luca
    Baumeister, Philipp
    Fankhauser, Christian
    Mordasini, Livio
    Moschini, Marco
    Aschwanden, Fabian
    Mattei, Agostino
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 32 : 1 - +
  • [25] Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Choi, Wesley W.
    Freire, Marcos P.
    Soukup, Jane R.
    Yin, Lei
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Carvas, Fernando
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 29 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [26] Randomized Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
    Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
    Fraga, Clovis T. Pereira
    Annino, Filippo
    Pasqualetti, Patrizio
    Calado, Adriano A.
    Mugnier, Camille
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (05): : 1503 - 1512
  • [27] Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Wesley W. Choi
    Marcos P. Freire
    Jane R. Soukup
    Lei Yin
    Stuart R. Lipsitz
    Fernando Carvas
    Stephen B. Williams
    Jim C. Hu
    World Journal of Urology, 2011, 29 : 21 - 27
  • [28] Functional outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective analysis using validated questionnaires
    Stefano Uccella
    Baldo Gisone
    Maurizio Serati
    Sara Biasoli
    Nicola Marconi
    Gloria Angeretti
    Valerio Gallotta
    Silvia Cardinale
    Stefano Rausei
    Gianlorenzo Dionigi
    Giovanni Scambia
    Fabio Ghezzi
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018, 298 : 639 - 647
  • [29] Functional outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective analysis using validated questionnaires
    Uccella, Stefano
    Gisone, Baldo
    Serati, Maurizio
    Biasoli, Sara
    Marconi, Nicola
    Angeretti, Gloria
    Gallotta, Valerio
    Cardinale, Silvia
    Rausei, Stefano
    Dionigi, Gianlorenzo
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (03) : 639 - 647
  • [30] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SINGLE-PORT PYELOPLASTY IN CHILDREN USING THE DA VINCI SP® SYSTEM
    Kang, Sungku
    Jang, Won Sik
    Kim, Sang Woon
    Hwang, Tae Hyun
    Han, Sang Won
    Lee, Yong Seung
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E180 - E180