Interconnecting peer feedback literacy: Exploring the relationship between providing and acting on peer feedback

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Schunn, Christian D. [2 ]
Wu, Yong [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Educ Future, 18 Jingfeng Rd, Zhuhai 519087, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Learning Res & Dev Ctr, 3420 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Humanities, 10 Xitucheng Rd, Beijing 100876, Peoples R China
关键词
Peer feedback literacy; Implementation; Feedback features; Providing feedback; Rating validity; QUALITY; ANONYMITY; ASSESSEE; IMPROVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101411
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recent research highlights the concept of feedback literacy, focusing on students' active engagement in feedback processes, including giving and receiving peer feedback. However, most studies rely on self-assessments through surveys and interviews, with few examining actual feedback behaviors. This study explores the behavioral aspects of peer feedback literacy among 844 high school students using an online system for peer feedback and revisions. Multiple measures related to provided ratings and comments as well as use in revisions were extracted using systematic coding. Factor analysis and structural equation modeling identified two distinct elements of high-quality feedback provision-providing features and rating validity-and confirmed a moderate correlation between the ability to provide quality feedback and the use of feedback. These skills were weakly correlated with writing ability. This research contributes to the emerging literature of peer feedback literacy and supports the development of more effective peer feedback training approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions
    Hoo, Hui-Teng
    Deneen, Christopher
    Boud, David
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (03) : 444 - 457
  • [42] Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy
    Burgess, Annette
    Roberts, Chris
    Lane, Andrew Stuart
    Haq, Inam
    Clark, Tyler
    Kalman, Eszter
    Pappalardo, Nicole
    Bleasel, Jane
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [43] Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy
    Annette Burgess
    Chris Roberts
    Andrew Stuart Lane
    Inam Haq
    Tyler Clark
    Eszter Kalman
    Nicole Pappalardo
    Jane Bleasel
    BMC Medical Education, 21
  • [44] Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback
    Strickland, N. H.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (11) : 1158 - 1164
  • [45] Soliciting feedback on the wards: a peer-to-peer workshop
    Yau, Bernice N.
    Chen, Alissa S.
    Ownby, Allison R.
    Hsieh, Peggy
    Ford, Christine D.
    CLINICAL TEACHER, 2020, 17 (03): : 280 - 285
  • [46] The development of academics' feedback literacy: experiences of learning from critical feedback via scholarly peer review
    Gravett, Karen
    Kinchin, Ian M.
    Winstone, Naomi E.
    Balloo, Kieran
    Heron, Marion
    Hosein, Anesa
    Lygo-Baker, Simon
    Medland, Emma
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (05) : 651 - 665
  • [47] Preservice mathematics teachers' beliefs about peer feedback, perceptions of their peer feedback message, and emotions as predictors of peer feedback accuracy and comprehension of the learning task
    Alqassab, Maryam
    Strijbos, Jan-Willem
    Ufer, Stefan
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (01) : 139 - 154
  • [48] Peer Feedback for Learning Mathematics
    Reinholz, Daniel L.
    AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 2018, 125 (07): : 653 - 658
  • [49] Is it Really a Choice Between Quantity and Quality for Peer Feedback?
    Thiam, Sitoe
    Madruga, Tiffany
    Vasquez, Andrea
    Kothari, Ragini
    Krauss, Gordon G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2020, 36 (02) : 687 - 701
  • [50] A comparison of peer and tutor feedback
    Hamer, John
    Purchase, Helen
    Luxton-Reilly, Andrew
    Denny, Paul
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 40 (01) : 151 - 164