Predictors of sustained reverse remodelling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

被引:0
|
作者
Furquim, Silas Ramos [1 ]
Bocchi, Edimar Alcides [1 ]
Lira, Maria Tereza Sampaio de Sousa [1 ]
Wanderley Jr, Mauro Rogerio de Barros [2 ]
de Marchi, Daniel Catto [1 ]
Maciel, Pamela Camara [1 ]
Zimerman, Andre [3 ]
Ramires, Felix Jose Alvarez [1 ]
Nastari, Luciano [1 ]
Biselli, Bruno [1 ]
Chizzola, Paulo Roberto [1 ]
Munhoz, Robinson Tadeu [1 ]
Fernandes, Fabio [1 ]
Ayub-Ferreira, Silvia Moreira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Inst Coracao InCor, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, EUA, Boston, MA USA
[3] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Moinhos Vento Coll Hlth Sci, Clin Trials Unit, Porto Alegre, Brazil
来源
关键词
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; reverse remodelling; sustained reverse remodelling; DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/ehf2.15241
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who achieve reverse remodelling (RR) can experience a new decrease in ejection fraction (EF), and the predictors of sustained RR (SRR) are not completely understood. Objectives The study aims to identify predictors of SRR in patients with HFrEF after an increase in EF and evaluate SRR prognosis. Methods In this retrospective, observational study, we evaluated a real-life cohort of patients with HFrEF and >= 2 consecutive echocardiograms, divided according to left ventricular EF (LVEF) trajectory: no RR (NRR: 3/3 LVEF measurements < 40%), non-SRR (NSRR: second LVEF >= 40%, third LVEF < 40%), and SRR (SRR: second and third LVEF >= 40%). Results We included 3628 of 8072 assessed HF patients in the analysis, with mean age 56.2 (+/- 13.4) years, 64.4% male and 77.7% New York Heart Association (NYHA) I-II. Improved EF was observed for 1342 (37%) patients. Among those who achieved RR, 310 (23%) were NSRR, and 1032 (77%) were SRR. The mean (+/- SE) survival after the second echocardiogram was 10.6 (+/- 0.2) years. The SRR group had the longest survival (12.2 +/- 0.3 years), followed by the NSRR (10.6 +/- 0.5) and NRR (9.8 +/- 0.2 years) groups (P < 0.001). According to logistic multivariable regression, second LVEF [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.90, P < 0.001], second left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (OR = 0.93, CI = 0.90-0.96, P < 0.001), second IV septum thickness (OR = 1.12, CI = 1.03-1.23, P = 0.012), systolic blood pressure (OR = 1.01, CI = 1.00-1.02, P = 0.014), NYHA I-II (OR = 1.86, CI = 1.27-2.74, P = 0.001) and furosemide non-use (OR = 1.87, CI = 1.27-2.74, P < 0.001) independently predicted SRR. Conclusions Patients with greater EF increases and LVESD reductions at EF recovery, greater septum thickness, higher blood pressure, no need for diuretics and NYHA I/II maintenance had the best chance of maintaining recovered ventricular function.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic value of left atrial reverse remodelling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Sun, Yuxi
    Fu, Qiang
    Tse, Gary
    Bai, Lin
    Liu, Jiani
    He, Hongyan
    Zhao, Shuang
    Tse, Mimi
    Liu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [42] Predictors and Outcomes of Improved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Outpatients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Samman-Tahhan, Ayman
    McCue, Andrew A.
    Hedley, Jeffrey S.
    Chen, Christopher
    Kaka, Yaquta
    Savvoulidis, Panagiotis
    Spilias, Nikolaos
    Smith, Andrew L.
    Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2017, 23 (08) : S116 - S116
  • [43] Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac remodelling in a cohort of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction treated with dapagliflozin
    Bonini, J.
    Cantone, A.
    Dal Passo, B.
    Ballarini, T.
    Sanguettoli, F.
    Arzenton, M.
    Maio, D.
    Campo, G.
    Serenelli, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [44] RIGHT VENTRICULAR REMODELLING IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE WITH IMPROVED EJECTION FRACTION
    Puwanant, Sarinya
    Osotthanakorn, Thamonwan
    Puwatnuttasit, Peerawat
    Titichoatrattana, Sittinop
    Suksiriworaboot, Tanawin
    Sinphurmsukskul, Supanee
    Ariyachaipanich, Aekarach
    Siwamogsatham, Sarawut
    Boonyaratvej, Smonporn
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 762 - 762
  • [45] Longitudinal Changes in Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Roger, Veronique L.
    Weston, Susan A.
    Jiang, Ruoxiang
    Redfield, Margaret M.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2012, 5 (06) : 720 - 726
  • [47] Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
    Bloom, Michelle W.
    Greenberg, Barry
    Jaarsma, Tiny
    Januzzi, James L.
    Lam, Carolyn S. P.
    Maggioni, Aldo P.
    Trochu, Jean-Noel
    Butler, Javed
    NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS, 2017, 3
  • [48] Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
    Michelle W. Bloom
    Barry Greenberg
    Tiny Jaarsma
    James L. Januzzi
    Carolyn S. P. Lam
    Aldo P. Maggioni
    Jean-Noël Trochu
    Javed Butler
    Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 3
  • [49] Heart failure hospitalization in patients with reduced ejection fraction in a heart failure clinic
    Daniel Seabra, D.
    Oliveira, I.
    Neto, A.
    Andrade, A.
    Azevedo, J.
    Pinto, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 380 - 380
  • [50] Secondary valve regurgitation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
    Bartko, Philipp E.
    Hulsmann, Martin
    Hung, Judy
    Pavo, Noemi
    Levine, Robert A.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Vahanian, Alec
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Goliasch, Georg
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (29) : 2799 - +