共 50 条
Predictors of sustained reverse remodelling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
被引:0
|作者:
Furquim, Silas Ramos
[1
]
Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
[1
]
Lira, Maria Tereza Sampaio de Sousa
[1
]
Wanderley Jr, Mauro Rogerio de Barros
[2
]
de Marchi, Daniel Catto
[1
]
Maciel, Pamela Camara
[1
]
Zimerman, Andre
[3
]
Ramires, Felix Jose Alvarez
[1
]
Nastari, Luciano
[1
]
Biselli, Bruno
[1
]
Chizzola, Paulo Roberto
[1
]
Munhoz, Robinson Tadeu
[1
]
Fernandes, Fabio
[1
]
Ayub-Ferreira, Silvia Moreira
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Inst Coracao InCor, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, EUA, Boston, MA USA
[3] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Moinhos Vento Coll Hlth Sci, Clin Trials Unit, Porto Alegre, Brazil
来源:
关键词:
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction;
reverse remodelling;
sustained reverse remodelling;
DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
10.1002/ehf2.15241
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who achieve reverse remodelling (RR) can experience a new decrease in ejection fraction (EF), and the predictors of sustained RR (SRR) are not completely understood. Objectives The study aims to identify predictors of SRR in patients with HFrEF after an increase in EF and evaluate SRR prognosis. Methods In this retrospective, observational study, we evaluated a real-life cohort of patients with HFrEF and >= 2 consecutive echocardiograms, divided according to left ventricular EF (LVEF) trajectory: no RR (NRR: 3/3 LVEF measurements < 40%), non-SRR (NSRR: second LVEF >= 40%, third LVEF < 40%), and SRR (SRR: second and third LVEF >= 40%). Results We included 3628 of 8072 assessed HF patients in the analysis, with mean age 56.2 (+/- 13.4) years, 64.4% male and 77.7% New York Heart Association (NYHA) I-II. Improved EF was observed for 1342 (37%) patients. Among those who achieved RR, 310 (23%) were NSRR, and 1032 (77%) were SRR. The mean (+/- SE) survival after the second echocardiogram was 10.6 (+/- 0.2) years. The SRR group had the longest survival (12.2 +/- 0.3 years), followed by the NSRR (10.6 +/- 0.5) and NRR (9.8 +/- 0.2 years) groups (P < 0.001). According to logistic multivariable regression, second LVEF [odds ratio (OR) = 1.06, confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.90, P < 0.001], second left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (OR = 0.93, CI = 0.90-0.96, P < 0.001), second IV septum thickness (OR = 1.12, CI = 1.03-1.23, P = 0.012), systolic blood pressure (OR = 1.01, CI = 1.00-1.02, P = 0.014), NYHA I-II (OR = 1.86, CI = 1.27-2.74, P = 0.001) and furosemide non-use (OR = 1.87, CI = 1.27-2.74, P < 0.001) independently predicted SRR. Conclusions Patients with greater EF increases and LVESD reductions at EF recovery, greater septum thickness, higher blood pressure, no need for diuretics and NYHA I/II maintenance had the best chance of maintaining recovered ventricular function.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文