A comparison of surgical outcomes between outpatient and inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Nguyen, Tuan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hammad, Muhammed A. Moukhtar [1 ]
Dobbs, Ryan W. [4 ]
Vuong, Huy G. [5 ]
Basilius, Jacob [1 ]
Quy, Khoa [2 ]
Ngo, Hanh T. T. [2 ]
Nguyen, An [2 ]
Tran, Thi Tuyet Mai [2 ]
Khanmammadova, Narmina
Van, Trinh N. K. [2 ]
Ali, Sohrab N. [1 ]
Tiong, Ho Yee [6 ]
Choi, Se Young [7 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [8 ]
Lee, David, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, 3800 W Chapman Ave,Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Univ Med & Pharm Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Cho Ray Hosp, Dept Urol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Cook Cty Hlth & Hosp Syst, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Oklahoma Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[6] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Clemenceau Med Ctr, Surg Dept, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Several institutions have reported their experience with outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (O-RARP). However, it is unclear if the utilization of this approach represents an improvement over inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (I-RARP). This meta-analysis sought to compare the surgical outcomes between O-RARP and I-RARP. Methods: For relevant articles, three electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until April 30, 2022. A meta-analysis has been reported in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: of the 297 retrieved abstracts, 12 underwent full-text review, and 11 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total cohort of 2,875 cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (892 ORARP cases and 1,983 I-RARP cases). Compared to I-RARP, the O-RARP group had lower mean operative time (MD = -9.4 minutes, 95% CI -15.1 to -3.7, P = 0.001), fewer overall postoperative complications (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92, P = 0.017), shorter hospital stay (MD = -22.9 hours, 95% CI -26.0 to -19.7, P < 0.001), and lower postoperative opioid requirements (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other outcomes, including: estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, unscheduled visits after surgery, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after surgery, or three- and six-month continence rates. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that O-RARP is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing surgery for localized prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to better evaluate optimal patient selection, associated healthcare costs, and patient-reported outcomes. (c) 2025 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pan, Xiu-wu
    Cui, Xin-ming
    Teng, Jing-fei
    Zhang, Dong-xu
    Wang, Zhi-jun
    Qu, Fa-jun
    Gao, Yi
    Cui, Xin-gang
    Xu, Dan-feng
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S1326 - S1333
  • [22] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xiu-wu Pan
    Xin-ming Cui
    Jing-fei Teng
    Dong-xu Zhang
    Zhi-jun Wang
    Fa-jun Qu
    Yi Gao
    Xin-gang Cui
    Dan-feng Xu
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 1326 - 1333
  • [23] Comparison of perioperative outcomes of DaVinci robot and Hugo robot radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ge, Si
    Wang, Zuoping
    Zheng, Lei
    Li, Yunxiang
    Gan, Lijian
    Zeng, Zhiqiang
    Meng, Chunyang
    Li, Kangsen
    Ma, Jiakai
    Wang, Deyu
    Ren, Yuan
    EJSO, 2025, 51 (05):
  • [24] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted vs. Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Li, Jinze
    Peng, Lei
    Cao, Dehong
    Cheng, Bo
    Gou, Haocheng
    Li, Yunxiang
    Wei, Qiang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [25] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSPERITONEAL VERSUS EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A META-ANALYSIS
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Kim, Jong Chan
    Kim, Kyu Hyun
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Lee, Hye Young
    Chung, Jae Seung
    Cho, Kang Su
    Ham, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E352 - E353
  • [26] Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Purnomo, Stefanus
    Hamid, Agus Rizal Ardy Hariandy
    Siregar, Moammar Andar Roemare
    Afriansyah, Andika
    Mirza, Hendy
    Seno, Doddy Hami
    Purnomo, Nugroho
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (05) : 285 - 292
  • [27] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Costello, Anthony
    Eastham, James A.
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Menon, Mani
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Van der Poel, Henk
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 418 - 430
  • [28] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    De Carlo, Francesco
    Celestino, Francesco
    Verri, Cristian
    Masedu, Francesco
    Liberati, Emanuele
    Di Stasi, Savino Mauro
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (04) : 373 - 383
  • [29] Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis
    Michael Uy
    Raees Cassim
    Jaehoon Kim
    Jen Hoogenes
    Bobby Shayegan
    Edward D. Matsumoto
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 257 - 264
  • [30] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Novara, Giacomo
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Mocellin, Simone
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Menon, Mani
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 382 - 404