A comparison of surgical outcomes between outpatient and inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Nguyen, Tuan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hammad, Muhammed A. Moukhtar [1 ]
Dobbs, Ryan W. [4 ]
Vuong, Huy G. [5 ]
Basilius, Jacob [1 ]
Quy, Khoa [2 ]
Ngo, Hanh T. T. [2 ]
Nguyen, An [2 ]
Tran, Thi Tuyet Mai [2 ]
Khanmammadova, Narmina
Van, Trinh N. K. [2 ]
Ali, Sohrab N. [1 ]
Tiong, Ho Yee [6 ]
Choi, Se Young [7 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [8 ]
Lee, David, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, 3800 W Chapman Ave,Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Univ Med & Pharm Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Cho Ray Hosp, Dept Urol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Cook Cty Hlth & Hosp Syst, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Oklahoma Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[6] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Clemenceau Med Ctr, Surg Dept, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Several institutions have reported their experience with outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (O-RARP). However, it is unclear if the utilization of this approach represents an improvement over inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (I-RARP). This meta-analysis sought to compare the surgical outcomes between O-RARP and I-RARP. Methods: For relevant articles, three electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until April 30, 2022. A meta-analysis has been reported in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: of the 297 retrieved abstracts, 12 underwent full-text review, and 11 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total cohort of 2,875 cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (892 ORARP cases and 1,983 I-RARP cases). Compared to I-RARP, the O-RARP group had lower mean operative time (MD = -9.4 minutes, 95% CI -15.1 to -3.7, P = 0.001), fewer overall postoperative complications (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92, P = 0.017), shorter hospital stay (MD = -22.9 hours, 95% CI -26.0 to -19.7, P < 0.001), and lower postoperative opioid requirements (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other outcomes, including: estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, unscheduled visits after surgery, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after surgery, or three- and six-month continence rates. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that O-RARP is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing surgery for localized prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to better evaluate optimal patient selection, associated healthcare costs, and patient-reported outcomes. (c) 2025 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN OUTPATIENT AND INPATIENT ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A META-ANALYSIS
    Hammad, Muhammed A. Moukhtar
    Nguyen, Tuan
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Vuong, Huy Gia
    Basilius, Jacob
    Quy, Khoa
    Ngo, Hanh Thi Tuyet
    Nguyen, An
    Tran, Thi Tuyet Mai
    Van, Trinh Ngoc Khanh
    Ali, Sohrab Naushad
    Tiong, Ho Yee
    Choi, Se Young
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Lee, David I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E744 - E745
  • [2] Comparison of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Seo, Hyun-Ju
    Lee, Na Rae
    Son, Soo Kyung
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Lee, Seon Heui
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 57 (05) : 1165 - 1177
  • [3] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Novara, Giacomo
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Artibani, Walter
    Costello, Anthony
    Eastham, James A.
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 431 - 452
  • [4] Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Huang, Jing
    Zhang, Peiyan
    Zhang, Lifen
    Lin, Wang
    Wang, Chunhua
    Lin, Dahe
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 230 - 230
  • [5] Single port robot-assisted radical and simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Franco, Antonio
    Ditonno, Francesco
    Manfredi, Celeste
    Pellegrino, Antony A.
    Licari, Leslie Claire
    Bologna, Eugenio
    Feng, Carol
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    De Sio, Marco
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Cherullo, Edward E.
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Autorino, Riccardo
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024, 28 (1) : 117 - 128
  • [6] Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience
    Park, Jinsung
    Yoo, Dae-Seon
    Song, Cheryn
    Park, Sahyun
    Park, Sejun
    Kim, Seong Cheol
    Cho, Yongmee
    Ahn, Hanjong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) : 193 - 199
  • [7] Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience
    Jinsung Park
    Dae-Seon Yoo
    Cheryn Song
    Sahyun Park
    Sejun Park
    Seong Cheol Kim
    Yongmee Cho
    Hanjong Ahn
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 193 - 199
  • [8] The comparison of transurethral versus suprapubic catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Ze'an
    Li, Kaiwen
    Wu, Wanhua
    Wang, Qiong
    Ma, Xiaoming
    Lin, Chunhao
    Peng, Shengmeng
    Lai, Yiming
    Wang, Fen
    Huang, Hai
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2019, 8 (05) : 476 - +
  • [9] Comparison of functional outcomes after retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis
    Shi, Ming-Jun
    Yang, Jie
    Meng, Xiang-Yu
    Li, Sheng
    Liu, Tao
    Fang, Zhi-Hai
    Cao, Rui
    Wang, Xing-Huan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF META-ANALYSIS, 2014, 2 (03) : 107 - 126
  • [10] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu-Li
    Zheng, Gao-Feng
    Jiang, Ze-Peng
    Zhen-Li
    Zhou, Xie-Lai
    Zhou, Jin
    Ye, Chun-Hua
    Wang, Kang-Er
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)