Supporting Labor After 2 Cesarean Births

被引:0
|
作者
Forte, Bridget [1 ]
Welsh, Stephanie [1 ]
Logiudice, Jenna A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fairfield Univ, Mar Peckham Egan Sch Nursing & Hlth Studies, Fairfield, CT 06824 USA
关键词
decision aids; shared decision-making; trial of labor; vaginal birth after cesarean; VAGINAL BIRTH; UTERINE RUPTURE; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; SECTIONS; DELIVERY; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/jmwh.13721
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Labor after cesarean (LAC) is a safe alternative for pregnant persons who have had 1 or 2 previous cesarean births (CBs) and have no contraindication to vaginal birth. When compared with repeat CB, vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) reduces short- and long-term health complications and morbidity and should therefore be presented as an option. Despite recommendations from the American College of Nurse-Midwives and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in support of LAC, not all pregnant persons who are candidates have access to this option. In some areas, provider hesitancy and institutional guidelines limit the availability of LAC, especially after more than one CB. Midwives are uniquely positioned to advocate for this birthing option through the use of shared decision-making. In the antepartum period, birth decision aids, VBAC calculators, and continued dialogue allows for pregnant persons to make informed choices meeting their unique health needs and goals. This clinical rounds article highlights the safety of labor in a pregnant person with a history of 2 prior CBs. As presented in this case, when LAC includes the need for induction of labor, the use of a transcervical balloon catheter for cervical ripening and judicious use of oxytocin are safe, evidence-based options. Ultimately, LAC can offer pregnant persons an increased sense of autonomy and control over their labor and birth, which improve both satisfaction and outcomes, consistent with the family- and person-centered hallmarks of midwifery care.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of prior vaginal births on labor outcomes among women with previous cesarean delivery
    Ram, Maya
    Hiersch, Liran
    Ashwal, Eran
    Nassie, Daniel
    Lavie, Anat
    Yogev, Yariv
    Aviram, Amir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S627 - S627
  • [32] Cesarean sections for high-risk births: health, fertility, and labor market outcomes
    Muhlrad, Hanna
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2022, 124 (04): : 1056 - 1086
  • [33] LABOR AFTER PRIOR CESAREAN-SECTION
    PRIDJIAN, G
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 35 (03): : 445 - 456
  • [34] Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in Ireland
    Lutomski, Jennifer
    Greene, Richard
    Meaney, Sarah
    Forgeard, Natalie
    Devane, Declan
    Daly, Deirdre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S341 - S342
  • [35] Trial of labor after cesarean section is safe
    不详
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2004, 53 (10): : 766 - +
  • [36] Dinoprostone and Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery
    Leftwich, Heidi K.
    Peterson, Jessica
    Hibbard, Judith U.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 64S - 65S
  • [37] Trial of labor after cesarean birth in Iraq
    AlChalabi, KA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 58 (02) : 241 - 242
  • [38] Risks Of failed trial of labor and pre-labor cesarean delivery: Associations with large-for-gestational age births
    Brandt, Justin S.
    Hill, Jennifer M.
    Rosen, Todd J.
    Ananth, Cande V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S723 - S724
  • [39] TRENDS IN THE FREQUENCY OF CESAREAN BIRTHS
    PHILIPSON, EH
    ROSEN, MG
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 28 (04): : 691 - 696
  • [40] Cesarean births continue decline
    不详
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 1998, 113 (01) : 90 - 90