Ground Motion in Mexico City During the Intraslab Earthquake of 19 September 2017 (Mw 7.1) Revisited

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, S. K. [1 ]
Arroyo, D. [2 ]
Iglesias, A. [1 ]
Ordaz, M. [3 ]
Perez-Campos, X. [1 ,4 ]
Espindola, V. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Geofis, Circuito Invest S-N, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana, Dept Mat, Mexico City, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Circuito Invest S-N, Mexico City, Mexico
[4] Comprehens Nucl Test Ban Treaty Org, Vienna, Austria
来源
GEOFISICA INTERNACIONAL | 2025年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
Energetic seismic source; Anomalous Ground Motion; Damage in Mexico City; INSLAB EARTHQUAKES; SOURCE SPECTRA; AMPLIFICATION; ATTENUATION; MICHOACAN; STRESS; DEPTH; WAVES;
D O I
10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2025.64.2
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The intraslab earthquake of 2017 (M(w)7.1) was one of the most destructive earthquakes in the history of Mexico City. Several measures of the ground motion reveal that the 2017 event was unusually energetic at CU, the reference hill-zone site in the city, and, hence, in the entire Valley of Mexico, in the critical frequency range of 0.4 to 1 Hz, e.g., Fourier acceleration spectrum (FAS), peak ground velocity (PGV), and pseudoacceleration response spectrum (Sa), 5% damping, at structural periods of 1 <= T <= 1.8 s (0.55 <= f <= 1 Hz). However, the cause of the large ground motion at CU remains unresolved. The issue merits a careful analysis of all available data. On 7 December 2023, an intraslab M-w 5.8 earthquake occurred in proximity to the 2017 event. We analyze the recordings of the 2017 earthquake separately and of the 2017 and 2023 events together in an attempt to isolate the cause of the anomalous high-frequency radiation. In this context, we take recourse of the 2023 recordings as empirical Green's functions (EGFs). Synthesized Sa for a M(w)7.1 earthquake, using 2023 (M-w 5.8) recordings as EGFs and assuming the same stress drop, Delta sigma, of 3 MPa for both events, are significantly lower than those observed, irrespective of the azimuth. We find that the source was unusually energetic at all azimuths, and the role of rupture directivity in enhancing the ground motion was relatively small. The possibility that the enhanced ground motion in the city in 2017 was due to a particular direction of the incident wavefield on the 3-D structure of the Valley of Mexico may be ruled out since the recordings of the 2023 event, which was nearly collocated with the 2017 earthquake, show nothing anomalous. The simulated Sa using recordings of the 2023 event as EGFs suggest that a postulated intraslab M-w 7.1 earthquake, with source characteristics similar to the 2023 event, at a distance of similar to 130 km from CU, should cause little or no damage in the city. In other words, if the source of the 2017 earthquake had been a scaled-up version of the 2023 event then, quite likely, Mexico City would have been spared the damage and deaths that it suffered.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1508
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gender, disasters and mortality: Earthquake in Mexico City, September 19th, 2017
    Alberto Alvarez-Diaz, Jorge
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2020, 25 (07): : 2831 - 2836
  • [22] Mexico City during and after the September 19, 2017 earthquake: Assessment of seismic resilience and ongoing recovery process
    Tena-Colunga, A.
    Hernandez-Ramirez, H.
    Godinez-Dominguez, E. A.
    Perez-Rocha, L. E.
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING, 2021, 11 (05) : 1275 - 1299
  • [23] The interpretation of cumulative damage from the building response observed in Mexico City during the 19 September 2017 earthquake
    Rodriguez, Mario E.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2020, 36 (2_SUPPL) : 199 - 212
  • [24] Mexico City during and after the September 19, 2017 earthquake: Assessment of seismic resilience and ongoing recovery process
    A. Tena-Colunga
    H. Hernández-Ramírez
    E. A. Godínez-Domínguez
    L. E. Pérez-Rocha
    Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2021, 11 : 1275 - 1299
  • [25] SUBSOIL CHARACTERISTICS OF MEXICO CITY, ACELERATION AND HYSTERETIC ENERGY SPECTRA FOR THE MEXICO EARTHQUAKE OF SEPTEMBER 19, 2017
    Quinde, Pablo
    Reinoso, Eduardo
    GEOFISICA INTERNACIONAL, 2020, 59 (04): : 234 - +
  • [26] Tunnel performance during the Puebla-Mexico 19 September 2017 earthquake
    Mayoral, Juan M.
    Mosqueda, Gilberto
    De La Rosa, Daniel
    Alcaraz, Mauricio
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2020, 36 (2_SUPPL) : 288 - 313
  • [27] Intraslab Earthquake of 16 June 2013 (Mw 5.9), One of the Closest Such Events to Mexico City
    Singh, S. K.
    Perez-Campos, X.
    Espindola, V. H.
    Cruz-Atienza, V. M.
    Iglesias, A.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 85 (02) : 268 - 277
  • [28] Simultaneous rupture on conjugate faults during the 2018 Anchorage, Alaska, intraslab earthquake (MW 7.1) inverted from strong-motion waveforms
    Yujia Guo
    Ken Miyakoshi
    Masato Tsurugi
    Earth, Planets and Space, 72
  • [29] Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985 - earthquake behavior of soft sites in Mexico City
    Rukos, E.A.
    Earthquake Spectra, 1988, 4 (04): : 771 - 786
  • [30] Simultaneous rupture on conjugate faults during the 2018 Anchorage, Alaska, intraslab earthquake (MW 7.1) inverted from strong-motion waveforms
    Guo, Yujia
    Miyakoshi, Ken
    Tsurugi, Masato
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2020, 72 (01):