Ground Motion in Mexico City During the Intraslab Earthquake of 19 September 2017 (Mw 7.1) Revisited

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, S. K. [1 ]
Arroyo, D. [2 ]
Iglesias, A. [1 ]
Ordaz, M. [3 ]
Perez-Campos, X. [1 ,4 ]
Espindola, V. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Geofis, Circuito Invest S-N, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana, Dept Mat, Mexico City, Mexico
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Circuito Invest S-N, Mexico City, Mexico
[4] Comprehens Nucl Test Ban Treaty Org, Vienna, Austria
来源
GEOFISICA INTERNACIONAL | 2025年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
Energetic seismic source; Anomalous Ground Motion; Damage in Mexico City; INSLAB EARTHQUAKES; SOURCE SPECTRA; AMPLIFICATION; ATTENUATION; MICHOACAN; STRESS; DEPTH; WAVES;
D O I
10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2025.64.2
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The intraslab earthquake of 2017 (M(w)7.1) was one of the most destructive earthquakes in the history of Mexico City. Several measures of the ground motion reveal that the 2017 event was unusually energetic at CU, the reference hill-zone site in the city, and, hence, in the entire Valley of Mexico, in the critical frequency range of 0.4 to 1 Hz, e.g., Fourier acceleration spectrum (FAS), peak ground velocity (PGV), and pseudoacceleration response spectrum (Sa), 5% damping, at structural periods of 1 <= T <= 1.8 s (0.55 <= f <= 1 Hz). However, the cause of the large ground motion at CU remains unresolved. The issue merits a careful analysis of all available data. On 7 December 2023, an intraslab M-w 5.8 earthquake occurred in proximity to the 2017 event. We analyze the recordings of the 2017 earthquake separately and of the 2017 and 2023 events together in an attempt to isolate the cause of the anomalous high-frequency radiation. In this context, we take recourse of the 2023 recordings as empirical Green's functions (EGFs). Synthesized Sa for a M(w)7.1 earthquake, using 2023 (M-w 5.8) recordings as EGFs and assuming the same stress drop, Delta sigma, of 3 MPa for both events, are significantly lower than those observed, irrespective of the azimuth. We find that the source was unusually energetic at all azimuths, and the role of rupture directivity in enhancing the ground motion was relatively small. The possibility that the enhanced ground motion in the city in 2017 was due to a particular direction of the incident wavefield on the 3-D structure of the Valley of Mexico may be ruled out since the recordings of the 2023 event, which was nearly collocated with the 2017 earthquake, show nothing anomalous. The simulated Sa using recordings of the 2023 event as EGFs suggest that a postulated intraslab M-w 7.1 earthquake, with source characteristics similar to the 2023 event, at a distance of similar to 130 km from CU, should cause little or no damage in the city. In other words, if the source of the 2017 earthquake had been a scaled-up version of the 2023 event then, quite likely, Mexico City would have been spared the damage and deaths that it suffered.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1508
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deadly Intraslab Mexico Earthquake of 19 September 2017 (Mw 7.1): Ground Motion and Damage Pattern in Mexico City
    Singh, S. K.
    Reinoso, E.
    Arroyo, D.
    Ordaz, M.
    Cruz-Atienza, V.
    Perez-Campos, X.
    Iglesias, A.
    Hjorleifsdottir, V.
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 89 (06) : 2193 - 2203
  • [2] Examination of the vertical earthquake ground motion component during the September 19, 2017 (Mw=7.1) earthquake in Mexico City
    Ruiz-Garcia, Jorge
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 110 : 13 - 17
  • [3] Ground response in the September 19th 2017 Mw=7.1 central Mexico earthquake
    Yniesta, S.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 5777 - 5783
  • [4] Overview of collapsed buildings in Mexico City after the 19 September 2017 (Mw7.1) earthquake
    Galvis, Francisco A.
    Miranda, Eduardo
    Heresi, Pablo
    Davalos, Hector
    Ruiz-Garcia, Jorge
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2020, 36 (2_SUPPL) : 83 - 109
  • [5] The September 19, 2017 Mw 7.1 Puebla-Mexico City earthquake: Observed rockfall and landslide activity
    Montgomery J.
    Candia G.
    Lemnitzer A.
    Martinez A.
    Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 130
  • [6] Key findings and observations following the September 19th, 2017 Mw 7.1 Puebla-Mexico City earthquake
    Mayoral, J. M.
    Roman, A.
    De la Rosa, D.
    Alcaraz, M.
    Rivas, R.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 833 - 844
  • [7] Evaluation of seismic displacement demands from the September 19, 2017 Puebla-Morelos (Mw=7.1) earthquake in Mexico City
    Ruiz-Garcia, Jorge
    Miranda, Eduardo
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2018, 47 (13): : 2726 - 2732
  • [8] Topographic effects during the September 19, 2017 Mexico city earthquake
    Mayoral, Juan M.
    De la Rosa, D.
    Tepalcapa, S.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 125
  • [9] The September 19, 2017 Mw 7.1 Puebla-Mexico city earthquake: Important findings from the field - Overview of Special Edition
    Mayoral, Juan M.
    Franke, Kevin W.
    Hutchinson, Tara
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 123 : 520 - 524
  • [10] The September 19, 2017 MW 7.1 CENTRAL-Mexico earthquake: Immediate observations on selected infrastructure systems
    Lemnitzer, A.
    Arduino, P.
    Dafni, J.
    Franke, K. W.
    Martinez, A.
    Mayoral, J.
    El Mohtar, C.
    Pehlivan, M.
    Yashinsky, M.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 141