Enhancing oralities methodology: ontological framing and cultural principles in research

被引:0
|
作者
Sanga, Kabini [1 ]
Reynolds, Martyn [1 ]
Rohoana, Grace [2 ]
Hiele, Graham [2 ]
机构
[1] Te Herenga Waka Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Educ, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Solomon Isl Natl Univ, Sch Educ, Honiara, Solomon Islands
关键词
Orality research; methodology; ontology; tok stori; Melanesia; Solomon Islands; SOLOMON-ISLANDS; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2024.2448969
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Research interest in oralities, traditional Indigenous dialogic forms of communication, is growing. Various oralities have been valuable in Oceania social research in fields such as leadership development and climate change. However, in the transition of traditional forms to formal research, attention can be paid to on-the-ground details and matters of culture rather than to ontological framings. This article provides two ways to attend to this issue. The first refers to the Oceania Oralities Framework, a representation of ontological elements that inform the performance of oralities in the region. The second is an exploration of the way cultural groups' prioritised principles are useful for conducting research through an Oceania orality and which map onto the framework. The framework and principles are demonstrated through the example of tok stori, a Melanesian orality and an account of education research in the institutional domain. However, these ideas have potential in any social domain or field of social research, and in contexts that invite research through traditional oralities beyond Melanesia.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures
    Balane, Marysol Astrea
    Palafox, Benjamin
    Palileo-Villanueva, Lia M.
    McKee, Martin
    Balabanova, Dina
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (11):
  • [42] From international principles to local practices: a socio-legal framing of public participation research
    Howard, Tanya
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 17 (04) : 747 - 763
  • [43] Comparative cross-cultural service quality: an assessment of research methodology
    Morales, Miguel
    Ladhari, Riadh
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 22 (02) : 241 - 265
  • [44] NORMAL-FAMILIES - PROBLEMS IN CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH METHODS AND METHODOLOGY
    OLSEN, MKG
    SPOLJARVRZINA, SM
    RUDAN, V
    KERSICBARBARIC, AM
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 1991, 15 (02) : 299 - 307
  • [45] The new cultural history as a methodology proposed for research in the nursing history field
    Almeida, Erika Bicalho
    da Silva, Aline dos Santos
    Figueiredo, Julieta Brites
    de Amorim, Wellington Mendonca
    Chad Pellon, Luiz Henrique
    REVISTA DE PESQUISA-CUIDADO E FUNDAMENTAL ONLINE, 2018, 10 (01): : 130 - 136
  • [46] The challenges of research in native American communities: Incorporating principles of cultural competence
    Weaver, HN
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SERVICE RESEARCH, 1997, 23 (02) : 1 - 15
  • [47] Cross-Cultural Practice of Leadership: Principles and Challenges of Empirical Research
    Vilas-Boas, Otacilio Torres
    Barreto Davel, Eduardo Paes
    TEORIA E PRATICA EM ADMINISTRACAO-TPA, 2018, 8 (01): : 106 - 137
  • [48] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF VISUAL RESEARCH IN ENHANCING THE CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICES IN CREATIVE INDUSTRY
    Maying, Doris
    Rafee, Yakup Mohd
    Leong, Sarah Naemah Aman
    Arshad, Awangko Hamdan Awang
    Siri, Hishamuddin
    Jussem, Sylvester Wielding
    Hassan, Mohamad Zamhari Abol
    Halim, Hakimi
    Bala, Poline
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2019, 20 (02): : 840 - 850
  • [49] Uncovering the cultural dynamics in mentoring programs and relationships: Enhancing practice and research
    Mullen, Carol A.
    MENTORING & TUTORING, 2015, 23 (02): : 178 - 182
  • [50] Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research
    King, G
    Murray, CJL
    Salomon, JA
    Tandon, A
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2003, 97 (04) : 567 - 583