Efficacy and safety of Xiaoyao San in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Qianqian [1 ]
Zhou, Jian [1 ]
Gong, Guanwen [2 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Prevent Treatment Dis, Nantong, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
chronic fatigue syndrome; traditional Chinese medicine; Xiaoyao San; standard biomedical treatments; systematic review; meta-analysis; TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE; HIPPOCAMPUS; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2025.1496774
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Xiaoyao San (XYS) has been increasingly used in China for treating chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), but its efficacy and safety remain unclear. Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of XYS compared to standard biomedical treatments (SBT) in CFS patients. Methods A comprehensive search of English and Chinese databases was conducted up to December 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing XYS or XYS + SBT to SBT alone. Primary outcomes were effective rate (ER) and fatigue scale-14 (FS-14). Secondary outcomes included self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and adverse events (AEs). Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, and evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results Six studies involving 623 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that XYS-based interventions significantly improved ER (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.18-1.37, I2 = 0%) and FS-14 (MD = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.49-2.06, I2 = 54%). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent efficacy for both XYS vs. SBT and XYS + SBT vs. SBT. Anxiety and depression improved significantly in the XYS + SBT group, with SAS (MD = 5.16, 95% CI: 3.84-6.48, I2 = 24%) and SDS (MD = 4.62, 95% CI: 3.15-6.09, I2 = 0%). Additionally, the risk of AEs was significantly reduced in the XYS + SBT group compared to SBT alone (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.72, I2 = 0%). However, the quality of evidence was rated "low" due to risk of bias and potential publication bias among the studies. Conclusion XYS, whether alone or with SBT, is effective and safe for improving ER, fatigue, anxiety, and depression in CFS patients. However, due to the low quality of the evidence, results should be interpreted cautiously. High-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to provide stronger evidence for the clinical use of XYS in managing CFS. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=493084, identifier CRD42023493084.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid in the treatment of sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zou, Hua
    Yi, Fang
    Wang, Qibing
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (07) : 2912 - 2914
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of odanacatib for osteoporosis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Rongjin
    Chen, Changshun
    Geng, Bin
    Yang, Chenhui
    Xiao, Hefang
    Yang, Fei
    Wang, Hao
    Xia, Yayi
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [33] The efficacy and safety of buprenorphine for the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Riblet, Natalie B.
    Young-Xu, Yinong
    Shiner, Brian
    Schnurr, Paula P.
    Watts, Bradley, V
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2023, 161 : 393 - 401
  • [34] The Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab for the Treatment of nAMD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chuan, Junlan
    Liu, Lianqiao
    Feng, Yumei
    Wang, Mengdan
    Li, Gang
    Lv, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of baloxavir in the treatment of influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haidar, Lara
    Aboulatta, Laila Nabil Mahmoud Helmy
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    Azar, Rania
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 343 - 343
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of odanacatib for osteoporosis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rongjin Chen
    Changshun Chen
    Bin Geng
    Chenhui Yang
    Hefang Xiao
    Fei Yang
    Hao Wang
    Yayi Xia
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 18
  • [37] The efficacy and safety of Zuranolone for treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fayoud, Aya M.
    Orebi, Hisham Ahmed
    Elshnoudy, Iman Abdelhady
    Elsebaie, Mai Alaaeldin Temraz
    Elewid, Mariam Mahmoud Mohamed
    Sabra, Hamdy Khaled
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 241 (07) : 1299 - 1317
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of etanercept in the treatment of sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing, Shangfei
    Yang, Chenyuan
    Zhang, Xiaofei
    Wen, Shuzheng
    Li, Yuankui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 44 : 69 - 74
  • [39] Efficacy and safety in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Fachi, Mariana Millan
    de Deus Bueno, Lays
    de Oliveira, Denise Colaco
    da Silva, Leticia Lazarin
    Bonetti, Aline F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 46 (06) : 1549 - 1556
  • [40] The Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Neurodermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Lin
    Li, Xinyun
    Huang, Wei
    Li, Jialiang
    Rao, Xiangshu
    Lai, Yu
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022