Ranking the Barriers to the Energy Upgrading of Buildings Using the Best-Worst Method

被引:0
|
作者
Antoniou, Fani [1 ]
Mageiropoulos, Theofilos [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Hellen Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Thessaloniki 57400, Greece
关键词
energy efficiency; BWM; ranking of barriers; nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEB); green buildings; eco-materials; residential homes; INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS; TECHNOLOGIES ADOPTION; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; SAVING TECHNOLOGIES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; POLICY; EFFICIENCY; DRIVERS; STAKEHOLDERS; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.3390/su162210143
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The global need to reduce energy demand has led European governments to accelerate their endeavors to achieve their targets regarding nearly zero-energy buildings. Despite the implementation of funding initiatives for the energy upgrading of buildings in EU member states and other European countries, research has shown that the absorption rates of the offered funds remain low. This research aims to assess the significance of the barriers to improving the energy efficiency of Greece's building stock. This is achieved by ranking the identified barriers using the best-worst method (BWM). The innovation provided by this study is that the data obtained are based on the experience of three categories of stakeholders, including professionals in the field, i.e., engineers and skilled workers, and homeowners. The results show that all three groups are discouraged from performing the energy upgrading of buildings due to economic barriers but also technological barriers related to a lack of training in the use of and slow development of related new technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A framework for evaluating the barriers to adopting Industry 4.0 in Indian SMEs: an approach of best-worst method
    Kumar, Roshan
    Kumar, Pravin
    Singh, Rajesh Kumar
    Vaish, Anurika
    Sharma, Garima
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ANALYTICS, 2024, : 705 - 737
  • [32] Water Saving Management Contract, identification and ranking of risks based on life cycle and best-worst method
    Ma, Weimin
    Li, Xiaona
    Wang, Xiaosheng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 306
  • [33] An MCDM method for cloud service selection using a Markov chain and the best-worst method
    Nawaz, Falak
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    Janjua, Naeem Khalid
    Hussain, Omar Khadeer
    Chang, Elizabeth
    Saberi, Morteza
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 159 : 120 - 131
  • [34] The best-worst method for the study of preferences: Theory and applications
    Marley, Anthony A. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 168 - 168
  • [35] The best-worst method for the study of preferences Theory and application
    Marley, A. A. J.
    COGNITION AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, VOL 1, 2010, : 147 - 157
  • [36] The heterogeneous best-worst choice method in market research
    Tavares, Susana
    Cardoso, Margarida
    Dias, Jose G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2010, 52 (04) : 533 - 546
  • [37] Fuzzy applications of Best-Worst method in manufacturing environment
    Sofuoglu, Mehmet Alper
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (01) : 647 - 659
  • [38] A Linguistic 2-tuple Best-Worst Method
    Labella, Alvaro
    Dutta, Bapi
    Rodriguez, Rosa M.
    Martinez, Luis
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 41 - 51
  • [39] Identification, ranking and prioritisation of vital environmental sustainability indicators in manufacturing sector using pareto analysis cum best-worst method
    Gani, Abdul
    Asjad, Mohammad
    Talib, Faisal
    Khan, Zahid A.
    Siddiquee, Arshad Noor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (03) : 226 - 244
  • [40] Embedding Best-Worst Method into Data Envelopment Analysis
    Yu, Yu
    Khezrimotlag, Dariush
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 41 (01)