Ranking the Barriers to the Energy Upgrading of Buildings Using the Best-Worst Method

被引:0
|
作者
Antoniou, Fani [1 ]
Mageiropoulos, Theofilos [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Hellen Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Thessaloniki 57400, Greece
关键词
energy efficiency; BWM; ranking of barriers; nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEB); green buildings; eco-materials; residential homes; INSTITUTIONAL BARRIERS; TECHNOLOGIES ADOPTION; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; SAVING TECHNOLOGIES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; POLICY; EFFICIENCY; DRIVERS; STAKEHOLDERS; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.3390/su162210143
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The global need to reduce energy demand has led European governments to accelerate their endeavors to achieve their targets regarding nearly zero-energy buildings. Despite the implementation of funding initiatives for the energy upgrading of buildings in EU member states and other European countries, research has shown that the absorption rates of the offered funds remain low. This research aims to assess the significance of the barriers to improving the energy efficiency of Greece's building stock. This is achieved by ranking the identified barriers using the best-worst method (BWM). The innovation provided by this study is that the data obtained are based on the experience of three categories of stakeholders, including professionals in the field, i.e., engineers and skilled workers, and homeowners. The results show that all three groups are discouraged from performing the energy upgrading of buildings due to economic barriers but also technological barriers related to a lack of training in the use of and slow development of related new technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Priority ranking for the best-worst method
    Tu, Jiancheng
    Wu, Zhibin
    Pedrycz, Witold
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 635 : 42 - 55
  • [2] Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best-Worst scaling method
    Pinto, Luis
    Kaynak, Erdener
    Chow, Clement S. F.
    Zhang, Lida L.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2019, 31 (01) : 223 - 245
  • [3] Can We Move Beyond First-Choice DCEs Using Best-Worst Using Best-Worst, Best-Best or Ranking?
    Huls, Samare P. I.
    Lancsar, Emily
    Donkers, Bas
    Ride, Jemimah
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (06): : 866 - 866
  • [4] Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method
    Gupta, Parmarth
    Anand, Sanjeev
    Gupta, Himanshu
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2017, 31 : 244 - 259
  • [5] Innovation and Survival of Traditional Industries: Measuring Barriers Using the Best-Worst Method
    Khani, Soodabeh Amiri Ali Akbar
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Latifi, Mohammad-Ali
    Salimi, Negin
    Labib, Ashraf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2023,
  • [6] Identifying challenges and barriers for development of solar energy by using fuzzy best-worst method: A case study
    Mostafaeipour, Ali
    Alvandimanesh, Marzieh
    Naja, Fatemeh
    Issakhov, Alibek
    ENERGY, 2021, 226
  • [7] Determining the Importance of Barriers to IoT Implementation Using Bayesian Best-Worst Method
    Abkenar, Zahra Asadipour
    Lajimi, Hamidreza Fallah
    Hamedi, Mahdie
    Parkouhi, Sahar Valipour
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 144 - 159
  • [8] Analyzing the barriers to industry 4.0 through best-worst method
    Kumar S.
    Suhaib M.
    Asjad M.
    International Journal of Performability Engineering, 2020, 16 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [9] The Balancing Role of Best and Worst in Best-Worst Method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 1 - 15
  • [10] The behavioural best-worst method
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 209